48 research outputs found

    Predictors of Over-Reporting HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Adherence Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men (YMSM) in Self-Reported Versus Biomarker Data

    Get PDF
    Young men who have sex with men (YMSM) face a disproportionately high burden of HIV. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective in preventing HIV acquisition, but adherence to PrEP among YMSM may be inadequate. Medication adherence may be assessed via biomarkers, which are expensive and invasive, or via self-report through Audio Computer Assisted Self-Interview (ACASI), which may result in over-reporting of adherence. In this paper we assess the potential of a new method of self-report, the Interactive Questionnaire System (iQS), in validly estimating true adherence rates. PrEP adherence among 167 YMSM aged 15-23 was measured via dried blood spot (DBS), ACASI, and iQS twice over a 24-week study period. Both ACASI- and iQS-reported data revealed that over 40% of individuals self-reporting adequate PrEP adherence had DBS-estimated drug levels indicating inadequate adherence. Adjusted logistic repeated measures random intercept regression analyses indicated that younger YMSM had higher odds of over-reporting adherence than older YMSM-each 1 year increase in age was associated with 0.79 times the odds of over-reporting adherence (95% CI 0.63, 0.98; p value = 0.031), and being African American was associated with 3.22 times greater odds of over-reporting than non-African Americans (95% CI 1.51, 6.90; p-value = 0.0003). These results suggest that ACASI and iQS methods of self-report significantly overestimate true PrEP adherence rates among YMSM, and that the odds of over-reporting adherence may be affected by both age and race

    Quantification of liver function by linearization of a two‐compartment model of gadoxetic acid uptake using dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144228/1/nbm3913.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144228/2/nbm3913_am.pd

    Volumetric 18F‐FDG‐PET parameters as predictors of locoregional failure in low‐risk HPV‐related oropharyngeal cancer after definitive chemoradiation therapy

    Full text link
    BackgroundWe sought to investigate the prognostic value of volumetric positron emission tomography (PET) parameters in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)‐related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) and a ≀10 pack‐year smoking history treated with chemoradiation.MethodsA total of 142 patients were included. Maximum standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary tumor, involved regional lymph nodes, and total lesion were calculated. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to evaluate associations of clinical and PET parameters with locoregional failure‐free survival (LRFFS), distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsOn univariate analysis, volumetric PET parameters were significantly associated with all endpoints, and 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer staging was significantly associated with DMFS and OS. On multivariate analysis, total lesion TLG was significantly associated with LRFFS, while staging was most significantly prognostic for DMFS and OS.ConclusionVolumetric PET parameters are uniquely prognostic of LRFFS in low‐risk HPV‐related OPSCC and may be useful for directing de‐intensification strategies.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147800/1/hed25505_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147800/2/hed25505.pd

    Recent Advances in Combined Modality Therapy

    Get PDF
    This review highlights the recent clinical data in support of newer generation cytotoxic chemotherapies and systemic targeted agents in combination with radiation therapy

    Paired phase II trials evaluating cetuximab and radiotherapy for low risk HPV associated oropharyngeal cancer and locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in patients not eligible for cisplatin

    Full text link
    BackgroundAlternative therapeutic strategies are needed for localized oropharyngeal carcinoma. Cetuximab represents a potential option for those ineligible for cisplatin or, until recently, an agent for de‐escalation in low risk HPV+ oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC). Our objective was to define the toxicity and efficacy of cetuximab‐radiotherapy.MethodsWe conducted paired phase II trials evaluating cetuximab‐radiotherapy in two cohorts (a) low risk HPV+ OPSCC and (b) cisplatin ineligible. The mean follow‐up was 48 months.ResultsForty‐two patients were enrolled in cohort A with a 2‐year disease free survival (DFS) of 81%. Twenty‐one patients were enrolled in cohort B prior to closure due to adverse outcomes with a 2‐year DFS of 37%. Severe toxicities were seen in 60% of patients, 30% required enteral nutrition.ConclusionAmong cisplatin ineligible patients, cetuximab treatment engendered poor outcomes. Rates of severe toxicities were on par with platinum‐based regimens suggesting that cetuximab is not a benign treatment.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156234/2/hed26085.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156234/1/hed26085_am.pd

    Impact of American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition clinical stage and smoking history on oncologic outcomes in human papillomavirus‐associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

    Full text link
    BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the AJCC eighth edition clinical staging system for human papillomavirus (HPV)‐associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and to further understand how clinical stage and smoking history affect oncologic outcomes. The purpose of this study was to present the understanding of how clinical stage and smoking history affect oncologic outcomes in human papillomavirus (HPV)‐associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is critical for selecting patients for treatment deintensification.MethodsKaplan‐Meier and Cox regression were used to evaluate overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence‐free survival (LRFS), and distant recurrence‐free survival (DRFS). Concordance statistics (C‐indices) were used to compare discriminating ability.ResultsThe OS and DRFS but not LRFS were significantly distributed using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) seventh and eighth editions criteria. The C‐indices for OS, LRFS, and DRFS were 0.57, 0.54, and 0.60, respectively, using the AJCC seventh edition, and 0.63, 0.53, and 0.65, respectively, using the AJCC eighth edition. On multivariate analysis, 1 + pack‐year smoking history correlated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2‐3.1; P < .01) but not LRFS or DRFS.ConclusionThese results support implementation of the AJCC eighth edition for HPV‐associated oropharyngeal SCC. Clinical stage may be more important than smoking history in selection for deintensification.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/148352/1/hed25336_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/148352/2/hed25336.pd

    Operational Ontology for Oncology (O3): A Professional Society-Based, Multistakeholder, Consensus-Driven Informatics Standard Supporting Clinical and Research Use of Real-World Data From Patients Treated for Cancer

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: The ongoing lack of data standardization severely undermines the potential for automated learning from the vast amount of information routinely archived in electronic health records (EHRs), radiation oncology information systems, treatment planning systems, and other cancer care and outcomes databases. We sought to create a standardized ontology for clinical data, social determinants of health, and other radiation oncology concepts and interrelationships. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The American Association of Physicists in Medicine\u27s Big Data Science Committee was initiated in July 2019 to explore common ground from the stakeholders\u27 collective experience of issues that typically compromise the formation of large inter- and intra-institutional databases from EHRs. The Big Data Science Committee adopted an iterative, cyclical approach to engaging stakeholders beyond its membership to optimize the integration of diverse perspectives from the community. RESULTS: We developed the Operational Ontology for Oncology (O3), which identified 42 key elements, 359 attributes, 144 value sets, and 155 relationships ranked in relative importance of clinical significance, likelihood of availability in EHRs, and the ability to modify routine clinical processes to permit aggregation. Recommendations are provided for best use and development of the O3 to 4 constituencies: device manufacturers, centers of clinical care, researchers, and professional societies. CONCLUSIONS: O3 is designed to extend and interoperate with existing global infrastructure and data science standards. The implementation of these recommendations will lower the barriers for aggregation of information that could be used to create large, representative, findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable data sets to support the scientific objectives of grant programs. The construction of comprehensive real-world data sets and application of advanced analytical techniques, including artificial intelligence, holds the potential to revolutionize patient management and improve outcomes by leveraging increased access to information derived from larger, more representative data sets
    corecore