13 research outputs found

    Uracil/tegafur plus oral calcium folinate in advanced breast cancer

    No full text
    Uracil and tegafur (in a molar ratio of 4:1 [UFT]) has proven activity against breast cancer and is delivered in an easy-to-administer oral formulation. Orzel, which combines UFT with the oral biomodulator, calcium folinate, may provide even greater antitumor efficacy against breast cancer. Here, we describe the preliminary results of this phase H trial investigating the feasibility of 250 mg/m2/day of UFT plus 45 mg/day of oral calcium folinate administered to highly pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer. The results indicate a highly tolerable regimen and an overall response rate of 27.8% in a group of poor-prognosis patients. These findings warrant continued investigation.Fil: Richardet, Eduardo Arnoldo. Universidad Cat贸lica de C贸rdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud; ArgentinaFil: Pedraza, Cecilia. Universidad Cat贸lica de C贸rdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud; ArgentinaFil: Mickiewicz, Elizabeth. Universidad Cat贸lica de C贸rdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud; ArgentinaFil: Lerzo, Guillermo. Universidad Cat贸lica de C贸rdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud; ArgentinaFil: Bonamasa, Miguel. Universidad Cat贸lica de C贸rdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud; ArgentinaFil: Coppola, Federico. Universidad Cat贸lica de C贸rdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud; ArgentinaFil: Elli, Alicia. Universidad Cat贸lica de C贸rdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud; ArgentinaFil: Uranga, Graciela. Universidad Cat贸lica de C贸rdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud; ArgentinaFil: Jovtis, Silvia. Universidad Cat贸lica de C贸rdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud; ArgentinaFil: Bruno, Mario. Universidad Cat贸lica de C贸rdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud; ArgentinaFil: Ventriglia, M贸nica. Universidad Cat贸lica de C贸rdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud; ArgentinaFil: Cuevas, Mar铆a Andrea. Universidad Cat贸lica de C贸rdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud; Argentin

    Sarcopenia and myosteatosis are accompanied by distinct biological profiles in patients with pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinomas

    No full text
    <div><p>Introduction</p><p>Pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinomas are associated with abnormal body composition visible on CT scans, including low muscle mass (sarcopenia) and low muscle radiodensity due to fat infiltration in muscle (myosteatosis). The biological and clinical correlates to these features are poorly understood.</p><p>Methods</p><p>Clinical characteristics and outcomes were studied in 123 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or non-pancreatic periampullary adenocarcinoma and who had available preoperative CT scans. In a subgroup of patients with pancreatic cancer (n = 29), <i>rectus abdominus</i> muscle mRNA expression was determined by cDNA microarray and in another subgroup (n = 29) <sup>1</sup>H-NMR spectroscopy and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry were used to characterize the serum metabolome.</p><p>Results</p><p>Muscle mass and radiodensity were not significantly correlated. Distinct groups were identified: sarcopenia (40.7%), myosteatosis (25.2%), both (11.4%). Fat distribution differed in these groups; sarcopenia associated with lower subcutaneous adipose tissue (P<0.0001) and myosteatosis associated with greater visceral adipose tissue (P<0.0001). Sarcopenia, myosteatosis and their combined presence associated with shorter survival, Log Rank P = 0.005, P = 0.06, and P = 0.002, respectively. In muscle, transcriptomic analysis suggested increased inflammation and decreased growth in sarcopenia and disrupted oxidative phosphorylation and lipid accumulation in myosteatosis. In the circulating metabolome, metabolites consistent with muscle catabolism associated with sarcopenia. Metabolites consistent with disordered carbohydrate metabolism were identified in both sarcopenia and myosteatosis.</p><p>Discussion</p><p>Muscle phenotypes differ clinically and biologically. Because these muscle phenotypes are linked to poor survival, it will be imperative to delineate their pathophysiologic mechanisms, including whether they are driven by variable tumor biology or host response.</p></div

    Kaplan-Meier plots.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Disease-free survival (DFS) as a function of sarcopenia. (B) Overall survival (OS) as a function of sarcopenia. (C) DFS as a function of myosteatosis. (D) OS as a function of myosteatosis. (E) DFS in individuals with both sarcopenia and myosteatosis. (F) OS in individuals with both sarcopenia and myosteatosis.</p

    Metabolomic models that distinguish body composition phenotypes in pancreatic cancer patients.

    No full text
    <p>(A) OPLS-DA scores plots and metabolite lists for NMR and GC-MS metabolites: sarcopenia vs. no sarcopenia or myosteatosis. (B) OPLS-DA scores plots and metabolite lists for NMR and GC-MS metabolites: myosteatosis vs. no sarcopenia or myosteatosis. For the metabolite lists: metabolites in <b>bold</b> are shared in 1H-NMR spectroscopy and GC-MS datasets; metabolites in red have a VIP>1.</p
    corecore