How predictable is development of resistance after β-lactam therapy in Enterobacter cloacae infection?

Certain non-fastidious Gram-negative bacilli, notably Enterobacter cloacae, although classified as susceptible by usual in-vitro susceptibility testing, often become resistant in patients treated with newer β-lactam antibiotics. Here various in-vitro tests were carried out together with an animal model allowing the quantification of resistance that emerges after short term therapy. Mice were challenged (102 cfu plus talcum) intraperitoneally with one each of four strains of Ent. cloacae. Two hours later, a single β-lactam dose was administered subcutaneously. The following day, the peritoneal bacterial population was analysed by using antibiotic-containing gradient plates. Development of resistance after therapy varied according to the compound considered. Imipenem (50 mg/kg) produced no resistance, and piperacillin (200 mg/kg) only a few, while resistance occurred frequently after therapy with aztreonam (50 mg/kg), ceftazidime (50 mg/kg), cefotaxime (50 mg/kg) and cefpirome (50 mg/kg). MICs increased by at least 16-fold when resistance developed. No simple correlations were found between these in-vivo results and initial MICs, killing kinetics, frequency of resistant variants within the bacterial populations before therapy, initial MIC of these variants or antibiotic concentrations assayed in peritoneal fluid 60 min after dosing. The most reliable predictive in-vitro test appeared to be the determination of resistance emerging in broth containing at least 16 times the MIC of the antibiotic tested. Such a test is unlikely to be used on a routine basis. When a β-lactam compound seems appropriate for treating an Enterobacter infection, it may be advisable to avoid drugs that are prone prone to produce resistance in experimental or clinical infections, whatever the results of conventional in-vitro susceptibility test

In-vitro activity of newer quinolones against aerobic bacteria

Nalidixic and five newer 4-quinolones, ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin and pefloxacin were tested against 576 recent clinical aerobic bacterial isolates. The 4-quinolones were regularly active (MIC90 < 4 mg/1) against the following bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, S. saprophyticus, different Enterobacteriaceae, Haemophilus influenzae, Campylobacter jejuni, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Agrobacter spp., Aeromonas spp., Plesiomonas spp., Neisseria meningitidis. Other bacteria were usually intermediately susceptible or resistant: different streptococci, Listeria monocytogenes, Nocardia asteroides, P. maltophilia, Achromobacter xylosoxydans and Alcaligenes denitrificans. Ciprofloxacin was the most potent compound, followed by ofloxacin and pefloxacin, norfloxacin and enoxacin being less active. All the 4-quinolones were much more active than nalidixic acid. The MBC/MIC ratios of the 4-quinolones were between 1 and 2 with a majority of strains, and between 2 and 3 with Streptococcus agalactiae, Str. faecalis and L. monocytogenes. A two- to eight-fold increase of MIC was observed by increasing the inoculum 10,000-fold with most of the strains tested. Susceptible bacterial population of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens and P. aeruginosa contained more clones resistant to nalidixic acid (104 to 108 at four times the MIC) than to 4-quinolones (105 to 109 at four times the MIC). Supplementing the media with MgSO4 produced smaller inhibition zone diameters with a disc diffusion method than those obtained with non-supplemented agar, with all quinolone or strains. Less regular effect, or no effect was obtained after supplementation with ZnSO4 or Ca(NO3)

Emergence of resistance after therapy with antibiotics used alone or combined in a marine model

A murine model of peritonitis allowing detection and quantification of in-vivo acquired resistance during short term therapy has been used in order to evaluate the capacity of antimicrobial combinations to limit emergence of resistance, as compared to individual components of the regimens. Mice were challenged intraperitoneally with 108 cfu of bacteria. Two hours later, a single antibiotic dose was injected subcutaneously: amikacin (15 mg/kg), ceftriaxone (50 mg/kg), pefloxacin (25 mg/kg), amikacin + ceftriaxone, amikacin + pefloxacin or ceftriaxone + pefloxacin. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus never became resistant. Single drug therapy yielded resistant mutants in Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as follows: 74% of ceftriaxone-treated animals, 57% of pefloxacin treated animals and 27% of amikacin treated animals. All the tested combinations reduced the frequency of in-vivo acquired resistance produced by single drugs, and no combination selected resistance when the separate agents of the combination did not. Combining antimicrobial agents limits the risk of emergence of resistance during antibiotic therap

In vitro evaluation of antibiotics' combinations for empirical therapy of suspected methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus severe respiratory infections

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Methicillin resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>(MRSA) is an increasingly common cause of nosocomial infections, causing severe morbidity and mortality worldwide, and accounting in some hospitals for more than 50% of all <it>S. aureus </it>diseases. Treatment of infections caused by resistant bacterial pathogens mainly relies on two therapeutic modalities: development of new antimicrobials and use of combinations of available antibiotics.</p> <p>Combinations of antibiotics used in the empiric treatment of infections with suspected methicillin resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>etiology were investigated.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Double (vancomycin or teicoplanin with either levofloxacin or cefotaxime) and triple (vancomycin or teicoplanin + levofloxacin + one among amikacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam) combinations were evaluated by means of checkerboard assay and time kill curves. Mutational rates of single and combined drugs at antimicrobial concentrations equal to the resistance breakpoints were also calculated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Vancomycin or teicoplanin + levofloxacin showed synergy in 16/50 and in 9/50 strains respectively, while vancomycin or teicoplanin + cefotaxime resulted synergic for 43/50 and 23/50 strains, respectively. Triple combinations, involving teicoplanin, levofloxacin and ceftazidime or piperacillin/tazobactam gave synergy in 20/25 strains. Teicoplanin + levofloxacin gave synergy in triple combinations more frequently than vancomycin + levofloxacin.</p> <p>For single antibiotics, mutational frequencies ranged between 10^-5and <10^-9for levofloxacin, cefotaxime, amikacin and imipenem, and <10^-9for vancomycin and teicoplanin. When tested in combinations, mutational frequencies fell below 10^-9for all the combinations.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p><it>In vitro </it>evidence of synergy between glycopeptides, fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin) and β-lactams and of reduction of mutational frequencies by combinations are suggestive for a potential role in empirical therapy of severe pneumonia with suspected MRSA etiology.</p