Non-invasive mechanical ventilation and mortality in elderly immunocompromised patients hospitalized with pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study

Christopher S. Johnson and Eric M. Mortensen are with the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and the VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas VA Medical Center -- Christopher R. Frei and Antonio R. Anzueto are with the South Texas Veterans Health Care System and the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio -- Christopher R. Frei is with the University of Texas at Austin, -- Mark L Metersky is with the University of Connecticut School of MedicineBackground: Mortality after pneumonia in immunocompromised patients is higher than for immunocompetent patients. The use of non-invasive mechanical ventilation for patients with severe pneumonia may provide beneficial outcomes while circumventing potential complications associated with invasive mechanical ventilation. The aim of our study was to determine if the use of non-invasive mechanical ventilation in elderly immunocompromised patients with pneumonia is associated with higher all-cause mortality. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data were obtained from the Department of Veterans Affairs administrative databases. We included veterans age ≥65 years who were immunocompromised and hospitalized due to pneumonia. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between the use of invasive versus non-invasive mechanical ventilation and 30-day and 90-day mortality. Results: Of 1,946 patients in our cohort, 717 received non-invasive mechanical ventilation and 1,229 received invasive mechanical ventilation. There was no significant association between all-cause 30-day mortality and non-invasive versus invasive mechanical ventilation in our adjusted model (odds ratio (OR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-1.10). However, those patients who received non-invasive mechanical ventilation had decreased 90-day mortality (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.84). Additionally, receipt of guideline-concordant antibiotics in our immunocompromised cohort was significantly associated with decreased odds of 30-day mortality (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.24-0.39) and 90-day mortality (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.31-0.53). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that physicians should consider the use of non-invasive mechanical ventilation, when appropriate, for elderly immunocompromised patients hospitalized with [email protected]

Future research directions in pneumonia

Copyright © 2018 by the American Thoracic Society. Pneumonia is a complex pulmonary disease in need of new clinical approaches. Although triggered by a pathogen, pneumonia often results from dysregulations of host defense that likely precede infection. The coordinated activities of immune resistance and tissue resilience then dictate whether and how pneumonia progresses or resolves. Inadequate or inappropriate host responses lead to more severe outcomes such as acute respiratory distress syndrome and to organ dysfunction beyond the lungs and over extended time frames after pathogen clearance, some of which increase the risk for subsequent pneumonia. Improved understanding of such host responses will guide the development of novel approaches for preventing and curing pneumonia and for mitigating the subsequent pulmonary and extrapulmonary complications of pneumonia. The NHLBI assembled a working group of extramural investigators to prioritize avenues of host-directed pneumonia research that should yield novel approaches for interrupting the cycle of unhealthy decline caused by pneumonia. This report summarizes the working group’s specific recommendations in the areas of pneumonia susceptibility, host response, and consequences. Overarching goals include the development of more host-focused clinical approaches for preventing and treating pneumonia, the generation of predictive tools (for pneumonia occurrence, severity, and outcome), and the elucidation of mechanisms mediating immune resistance and tissue resilience in the lung. Specific areas of research are highlighted as especially promising for making advances against pneumonia

Management of adults with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society

It is important to realize that guidelines cannot always account for individual variation among patients. They are not intended to supplant physician judgment with respect to particular patients or special clinical situations. IDSA considers adherence to these guidelines to be voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the physician in the light of each patient's individual circumstances. These guidelines are intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for patients at risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), including specialists in infectious diseases, pulmonary diseases, critical care, and surgeons, anesthesiologists, hospitalists, and any clinicians and healthcare providers caring for hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia. The panel's recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of HAP and VAP are based upon evidence derived from topic-specific systematic literature reviews

The effect of the endothelin-1 receptor antagonist, bosentan, on patients with poorly controlled asthma: a 17-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of bosentan on subjects with poorly controlled asthma. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover pilot study. Subjects were poorly controlled on anti-inflammatory and long acting β-agonist therapy, and had a baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) percent of predicted of 40 -70%. Subjects were randomized to receive either bosentan or placebo at the therapeutic dose of 125 mg twice a day for 4 weeks, and then crossed over to the alternate therapy. The asthma control test, asthma symptom scores, rescue albuterol use, and FEV1 were measured at baseline and during the last week of bosentan and placebo. Acute changes in FEV1 were measured after the initial therapeutic bosentan and placebo dose. RESULTS: Seven of eleven randomized subjects completed the protocol. There was no difference in change in FEV1 after the bosentan phase when compared with placebo (+0.08 ± 0.31 L and +0.23 ± 0.26 L p = .34). Changes from baseline values in the asthma control test and asthma symptom scores were also similar in bosentan and placebo phases (+1.71 ± 3.99 and +4.57 ± 4.39 p = .16) and (+0.14 ± 9.3 and -0.29 ± 5.28 p = .93). Rescue β-agonist use did not change significantly during the last week of the bosentan phase when compared with placebo phase (-5.86 ± 0.94 puffs and -5.14 ± 16.85 puffs p = .94). Additionally, there was no difference in the change in FEV1 4 hours after bosentan 125 mg and placebo (-0.08 L ± 0.07 vs. +0.04 L ± 0.20 p = .20). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, 4 weeks of bosentan did not improve FEV1, β-agonist use, asthma symptom score, or asthma control test score in patients with poorly controlled asthma when compared with placebo