17 research outputs found

    Soil Moisture Sensing via Swept Frequency Based Microwave Sensors

    Get PDF
    There is a need for low-cost, high-accuracy measurement of water content in various materials. This study assesses the performance of a new microwave swept frequency domain instrument (SFI) that has promise to provide a low-cost, high-accuracy alternative to the traditional and more expensive time domain reflectometry (TDR). The technique obtains permittivity measurements of soils in the frequency domain utilizing a through transmission configuration, transmissometry, which provides a frequency domain transmissometry measurement (FDT). The measurement is comparable to time domain transmissometry (TDT) with the added advantage of also being able to separately quantify the real and imaginary portions of the complex permittivity so that the measured bulk permittivity is more accurate that the measurement TDR provides where the apparent permittivity is impacted by the signal loss, which can be significant in heavier soils. The experimental SFI was compared with a high-end 12 GHz TDR/TDT system across a range of soils at varying soil water contents and densities. As propagation delay is the fundamental measurement of interest to the well-established TDR or TDT technique; the first set of tests utilized precision propagation delay lines to test the accuracy of the SFI instrument’s ability to resolve propagation delays across the expected range of delays that a soil probe would present when subjected to the expected range of soil types and soil moisture typical to an agronomic cropping system. The results of the precision-delay line testing suggests the instrument is capable of predicting propagation delays with a RMSE of +/−105 ps across the range of delays ranging from 0 to 12,000 ps with a coefficient of determination of r2 = 0.998. The second phase of tests noted the rich history of TDR for prediction of soil moisture and leveraged this history by utilizing TDT measured with a high-end Hewlett Packard TDR/TDT instrument to directly benchmark the SFI instrument over a range of soil types, at varying levels of moisture. This testing protocol was developed to provide the best possible comparison between SFI to TDT than would otherwise be possible by using soil moisture as the bench mark, due to variations in soil density between soil water content levels which are known to impact the calibration between TDR’s estimate of soil water content from the measured propagation delay which is converted to an apparent permittivity measurement. This experimental decision, to compare propagation delay of TDT to FDT, effectively removes the errors due to variations in packing density from the evaluation and provides a direct comparison between the SFI instrument and the time domain technique of TDT. The tests utilized three soils (a sand, an Acuff loam and an Olton clay-loam) that were packed to varying bulk densities and prepared to provide a range of water contents and electrical conductivities by which to compare the performance of the SFI technology to TDT measurements of propagation delay. For each sample tested, the SFI instrument and the TDT both performed the measurements on the exact same probe, thereby both instruments were measuring the exact same soil/soil-probe response to ensure the most accurate means to compare the SFI instrument to a high-end TDT instrument. Test results provided an estimated instrumental accuracy for the SFI of +/−0.98% of full scale, RMSE basis, for the precision delay lines and +/−1.32% when the SFI was evaluated on loam and clay loam soils, in comparison to TDT as the bench-mark. Results from both experiments provide evidence that the low-cost SFI approach is a viable alternative to conventional TDR/TDT for high accuracy applications

    Magnetic Induction tomography: analysis of resolution and object shifting

    No full text

    Imagereconstruction approaches for Philips magnetic induction tomograph

    No full text

    Numerical approach for the sensitivity of a high-frequency magnetic induction tomography system based on boundary elements and perturbation method

    No full text
    Magnetic induction tomography (MIT) is an imaging technique based on the measurement of the magnetic field perturbation due to eddy currents induced in conducting objects exposed to an external magnetic excitation field. In MIT, current-carrying coils are used to induce eddy currents in the object and the induced voltages are sensed with the receiving coils. When the driving frequency is significantly high relative to the frequency range in which MIT normally operates, metallic targets with high conductivity between the coils can be treated as perfect electric conductors (PEC) with negligible errors. In this scenario, the penetration depth of the magnetic field into the target is extremely small and the traditional versions of the finite element method (FEM) are not efficient for the calculation of the sensitivity and the forward problem due to the requirement for large number of elements to reach an acceptable computational precision. Other versions of FEMs (such as Hp-FEM), which have higher discretization efficiency and more advanced elements to satisfy the requirement, are exceptions. Nevertheless, the discretization regions for all FEMs have to extend beyond the region that contains the conducting object and volumetric elements are generally required for 3D problems. In contrast, the boundary element method (BEM) based on integral formulations becomes an effective way to analyze this kind of scattering problem since meshes are only required on the surface of the object. By point collocation, the boundary integral equations can be transformed into linear equations. Numerical methods are used to solve the linear equations and the solution of the original integral equations can be obtained. In this paper, we compute four typical sensitivity maps between the coil pairs in high-frequency MIT system due to a PEC perturbation. The magnetic scalar potential is used to improve the efficiency. Five PEC objects of different shapes are used in the simulation. The results have been compared with the experimental results and that obtained from the H·H formulations. We can know that the sensitivity maps derived by BEM are in good agreement with that from the experiment and theoretical solution. Overall, BEM is an effective way to calculate the sensitivity distributions of a high-frequency MIT system. © 2013 IOP Publishing Ltd
    corecore