Early MESSENGER Results for Less Abundant or Weakly Emitting Species in Mercury's Exosphere

Now that the Messenger spacecraft is in orbit about Mercury, the extended observing time enables searches for exospheric species that are less abundant or weakly emitting compared with those for which emission has previously been detected. Many of these species cannot be observed from the ground because of terrestrial atmospheric absorption. We report here on the status of MESSENGER orbital-phase searches for additional species in Mercury's exosphere

MESSENGER Searches for Less Abundant or Weakly Emitting Species in Mercury's Exosphere

Mercury's exosphere is composed of material that originates at the planet's surface, whether that material is native or delivered by the solar wind and micrometeoroids. Many exospheric species have been detected by remote sensing, including H and He by Mariner 10, Na, K, and Ca by ground-based observations, and H, Na, Ca, Mg, and Ca+ by the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft. Other exospheric species, including Fe, AI, Si, 0, S, Mn, CI, Ti, OH, and their ions, are expected to be present on the basis of MESSENGER surface measurements and models of Mercury's surface chemistry. Here we report on searches for these species made with the Ultraviolet and Visible Spectrometer (UVVS) channel of the Mercury Atmospheric and Surface Composition Spectrometer (MASCS). No obvious signatures of the listed species have yet been observed in Mercury's exosphere by the UVVS as of this writing. It is possible that detections are elusive because the optimum regions of the exosphere have not been sampled. The Sun-avoidance constraints on MESSENGER place tight limits on instrument boresight directions, and some regions are probed infrequently. If there are strong spatial gradients in the distribution of weakly emitting species, a high-resolution sampling of specific regions may be required to detect them. Summing spectra over time will also aid in the ability to detect weaker emission. Observations to date nonetheless permit strong upper limits to be placed on the abundances of many undetected species, in some cases as functions of time and space. As those limits are lowered with time, the absence of detections can provide insight into surface composition and the potential source mechanisms of exospheric material

Mercury's Sodium Exosphere: Observations during the MESSENGER Orbital Phase

The MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft entered into orbit about Mercury on March 18,2011. We now have approximately five Mercury years of data from orbit. Prior to the MESSENGER mission, Mercury's surface-bounded exosphere was known to contain H, He, Na. K, and Ca. The Ultraviolet and Visible Spectrometer (UVVS) began routine orbital observations of both the dayside and nightside exosphere on March 29. 2011, measuring altitude profiles for all previously detected neutral species except for He and K. We focus here on what we have learned about the sodium exosphere: its spatial, seasonal, and sporadic variation. Observations to date permit delineation of the relative roles of photon-stimulated desorption (PSD) and impact vaporization (IV) from seasonal and spatial effects, as well as of the roles of ions both as sputtering agents and in their possible role to enhance the efficiency of PSD. Correlations of Mercury's neutral sodium exosphere with measurements from MESSENGER's Magnetometer (MAG) and Energetic Particle and Plasma Spectrometer (EPPS) provide insight into the roles of ions and electrons. Models incorporating MAG observations provide a basis for identifying the location and area of the surface exposed to solar wind plasma, and EPPS observations reveal episodic populations of energetic electrons in the magnetosphere and the presence of planetary He(+), 0(+), and Na(+)

Observations of Mercury's Exosphere: Composition and Structure

Mercury is surrounded by a tenuous exosphere in which particles travel on ballistic trajectories under the influence of a combination of gravity and solar radiation pressure. The densities are so small that the surface forms the exobase and particles in the exosphere are more likely to collide with it rather than with each other. For a planet with a more substantial collision-dominated atmosphere, a population of particles that enters from below the exobase supplies the exosphere. In contrast Mercury's exosphere is supplied both by incoming sources including the solar wind (hydrogen and helium), micrometeoroids (dust), meteoroids and cornets, and by particles released from the surface through a variety of processes that include sputtering by solar wind ions, desorption by solar photons and electrons, impacts by micrometeoroids, and thermal desorption of surface materials. These source processes are balanced by loss processes, which include impact with and sticking to the surface, Jeans (or thermal) escape, ionization followed by transport along magnetic field lines, and acceleration by solar radiation pressure to escape velocity. Ground-based attempts to detect an atmosphere around Mercury before Mariner 10 first visited the planet in 1974 were unsuccessful and led only to increasingly tight upper limits, culminating in a limiting value for surface atmospheric pressure of 0.015 Pascal (Pa) determined by Fink et al. (1974)

Small Platforms, High Return: The Need to Enhance Investment in Small Satellites for Focused Science, Career Development, and Improved Equity

In the next decade, there is an opportunity for very high return on investment of relatively small budgets by elevating the priority of smallsat funding in heliophysics. We've learned in the past decade that these missions perform exceptionally well by traditional metrics, e.g., papers/year/\$M (Spence et al. 2022 -- arXiv:2206.02968). It is also well established that there is a "leaky pipeline" resulting in too little diversity in leadership positions (see the National Academies Report at https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/increasing-diversity-in-the-leadership-of-competed-space-missions). Prioritizing smallsat funding would significantly increase the number of opportunities for new leaders to learn -- a crucial patch for the pipeline and an essential phase of career development. At present, however, there are far more proposers than the available funding can support, leading to selection ratios that can be as low as 6% -- in the bottom 0.5th percentile of selection ratios across the history of ROSES. Prioritizing SmallSat funding and substantially increasing that selection ratio are the fundamental recommendations being made by this white paper.Comment: White paper submitted to the Decadal Survey for Solar and Space Physics (Heliophysics) 2024-2033; 6 pages, 1 figur

Evidence Connecting Mercury's Magnesium Exosphere to Its Magnesium-Rich Surface Terrane

Mercury is surrounded by a tenuous, collisionless exosphere where the surface of the planet is directly exposed to the space environment. As a consequence, impacts and space weathering processes are expected to eject atoms and molecules from the surface into the exosphere, implying a direct link between the exospheric composition and the planet's regolith material. However, observational evidence demonstrating this link has been elusive. Here we report that exospheric magnesium, a species recently discovered and systematically measured by the Mercury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging mission, is enhanced when observed over a portion of the planet's surface regolith rich in magnesium. These observations confirm a direct link between Mercury's magnesium exosphere and the underlying crustal surface composition, providing strong evidence supporting theoretical arguments that impact vaporization can directly supply material to the exosphere from the regolith of a rocky, airless body

Atmospheric escape rates from Mars – if it orbited an M Dwarf star

International audienceAs far as we know, all life requires liquid water. Liquid water at the surface of a planet is only possible when the planet has an atmosphere. But atmospheres of planets can change with time. In some cases, particles from atmospheres of planets can escape the planet entirely, driven away to space through interactions with the light and particles from the star that the planet orbits. Spacecraft orbiting Mars have measured the different ways that atmosphere can escape to space, providing useful information about how escape would work in any circumstances. This information is of particular interest for planets orbiting other stars - if we understood which of these planets could hold on to their atmospheres then we could constrain which kinds of planets might be able to support life at their surface. At present, many planets are being discovered orbiting stars that are smaller and cooler than our own Sun. This presentation imagines that Mars has been placed into orbit around one of these smaller cooler stars. Our team uses observations of a small, cool star to drive computer models of how the atmosphere escapes from Mars. We then estimate how long the atmosphere would last

Which star-planet combinations lead to atmospheric retention?

International audienceThe ability of a planet to retain an atmosphere influences whether water can be stable as a liquid at the planet’s surface. A planet’s atmospheric state is the result of source, loss, and modification processes that have acted on the atmosphere over time. The loss of atmosphere to space is therefore an important component in assessing planetary surface habitability. ‘Atmospheric escape’ is a catch-all term that refers to distinct processes that provide sufficient energy to particles for escape to space. Escape processes include thermal escape, hydrodynamic escape, ion loss, photochemical escape, and sputtering. At present, scientists who study atmospheric escape processes at Earth, solar system planets, and exoplanets each employ different and often siloed strategies to estimate escape rates. This fractured approach has hindered development of a comprehensive understanding of how atmospheric escape works at any planet.Here we present an overview of an ongoing team science effort to estimate atmospheric escape rates for a wide variety of star-planet combinations. With contributions from observers and modelers from the heliophysics, planetary science, and astrophysics communities, we have: (1) re-analyzed existing observations of atmospheric escape from different solar system objects, (2) compared escape from magnetized and unmagnetized regions of Mars to evaluate the importance of magnetic fields in controlling escape, and (3) upgraded and applied models of atmospheric ion escape. Our main focus in the coming years will be to determine which regions within the parameter space of stellar and planetary properties relevant for atmospheric escape are most likely to result in planets that retain habitable atmospheres. We will accomplish this by developing a database of end-to-end model predictions of escape via each of the major escape processes for more than 200 star-planet combinations