5 research outputs found
Priapismo maligno: un caso manejado de forma conservadora
Priapism is an urological emergency which requires investigation, especially to differentiate between ischemic and non-ischemic priapism. Initial management is carried out through aspiration and gasometry of blood from the corpus cavernosum. We report the case of a 69-year-old patient with urothelium carcinoma of the bladder T2 G3 and metastasis in urethra/corpus cavernosum who requested an emergency consultation because of edema and a penile erection lasting several days. Due to the poor prognosis and the imaging test, a conservative management was carried out
Case of emphysematous pyelonephritis in kidney allograft: Conservative treatment
Emphysematous pyelonephritis is an acute necrotizing infection with gas in the kidney and perinephric space that carries a bad prognosis. Apart from its predisposing clinical entities, diabetes mellitus and immune-incompetence are quite common in patients with this infection. We report a case of a 53-year-old kidney transplant recipient diabetic male, suffering from recurrent fever, abdominal pain and nausea episodes. Immediate broad-spectrum antibiotics were administered and percutaneous drainage was performed after the diagnosis. The bacteria involved were Stahpylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli. After 4 weeks of antibiotic treatment and abscesses drainage, the case was resolved. Consecutives urine cultures and ultrasonographies confirm the complete resolution of the disease. We discuss the predisposing factors, clinical presentation and management
Case of emphysematous pyelonephritis in kidney allograft: Conservative treatment
Emphysematous pyelonephritis is an acute necrotizing infection with gas in the kidney and perinephric space that carries a bad prognosis. Apart from its predisposing clinical entities, diabetes mellitus and immune-incompetence are quite common in patients with this infection. We report a case of a 53-year-old kidney transplant recipient diabetic male, suffering from recurrent fever, abdominal pain and nausea episodes. Immediate broad-spectrum antibiotics were administered and percutaneous drainage was performed after the diagnosis. The bacteria involved were Stahpylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli. After 4 weeks of antibiotic treatment and abscesses drainage, the case was resolved. Consecutives urine cultures and ultrasonographies confirm the complete resolution of the disease. We discuss the predisposing factors, clinical presentation and management
What is the impact of post‐radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence on everyday quality of life? Linking Pad usage and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short‐Form (ICIQ‐SF) for a COMBined definition (PICOMB definition)
Aims: To identify the definition for urinary continence (UC) after radical
prostatectomy (RP) which reflects best patients' perception of quality of
life (QoL).
Methods: Continence was prospectively assessed in 634 patients, 12 months
after RP using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire
Short‐Form (ICIQ‐SF) and the number of pads employed in a 24‐hour period
(pad usage). We used the one‐way ANOVA technique with posthoc pairwise
comparisons according to Scheffé's method (homogeneous subsets) for assessing the degree of QoL deficit related to urinary incontinence (UI).
Results: The continence prevalence is 64.4%, 74.1%, 88.3%, and 35.8% using “0
pads,” “1 safety pad,” “1 pad,” and “ICIQ score 0” definitions, respectively. Pad
usage is moderately strongly associated with ICIQ 1, 2, and 3 (ρ = 0.744, 0.677,
and 0.711, respectively; p < 0.001). Concordance between classical UC definitions is acceptable between “0 pads—ICIQ score 0” (K = 0.466), but poor for
“1 safety pad” and “1 pad” (K = 0.326 and 0.137, respectively). Patients with “0
pad usage” have better QoL related to urine leakage than patients with “1
safety pad” or “1 pad” (1.41 vs. 2.44 and 3.11, respectively; p < 0.05). There
were no significant differences found regarding QoL between patients with
ICIQ score 0 and ICIQ score 2 (1.01 vs. 1.63; p = 0.63).Conclusions: Pad usage and the ICIQ‐SF's answers provide useful information. We propose a combined definition (0 pads and ICIQ score ≤2) as it is the
definition with the least impact on daily QoL