PD45-01\u2003ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL ANAESTHETIC WOUNDS INFILTRATION AND ULTRASOUND TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINAL PLANE (US-TAP) BLOCK IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To determinate bene\ufb01ts of the association of local anaesthetic wounds in\ufb01ltration and US-TAPblock with ropivacaine on postoperative pain, early recovery and hospital stay in patients undergoing robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: The study is double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Our hypothesis was that the association of wound in\ufb01ltration and US-TAP block with Ropivacaine would decrease immediate postoperative pain and opioids use. Primary outcomes included postoperative pain and opioids demand during the hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were nausea/vomiting rate, stool passing time, use of pro-kinetics, length of hospital stay and 30-days readmission to the hospital for pain or other US-TAP-block related complications RESULTS: A total of 100 patients who underwent RARP were eligible for the analysis; 57 received the US-TAP block with 20 ml of 0.35% Ropivacaine (US-TAP-block group) and 43 did not receive USTAP block (no-US-TAP group). All the patients received the local wound anaesthetic in\ufb01ltration with 20 ml of 0.35% Ropivacaine. USTAP block group showed a decreased mean NRS (2.7vs1.8; p[0.04) and reduced use of opioid (8 vs 2; p[0.01) in the \ufb01rst 24 h. Moreover, we found a shorter mean LOS (4.7 vs 4.2; p[ 0.04) with a reduced use of pro-kinetics during the hospital stay (31 vs 12; p<0.001). No US-TAP-block related complications to were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Association of anaesthetic wound in\ufb01ltration and US-TAP block with Ropivacaine as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen can be safely offered to patients undergoing RARP and ePLND. It improves the immediate post-operative pain control, reducing opioids administration and is associated to a decreased use of pro-kinetics and shorter hospital stay

Perioperative Fluid Administration in Pancreatic Surgery: a Comparison of Three Regimens

Optimization of perioperative fluid management is a controversial issue. Weight-adjusted, fixed fluid strategies do not take into account patient hemodynamic status, so that individualized strategies guided by relevant variables may be preferable. We studied this issue in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery within our institution

Local wound infiltration plus transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus local wound infiltration in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and ERAS program

Background: Few data are available on TAP block in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and ERAS program. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate local wound infiltration plus TAP block compared to local wound infiltration in the management of postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, ileus and use of opioids in the context of laparoscopic colorectal surgery and ERAS program. Methods: From March 2014 to March 2015, 48 patients were treated by laparoscopic resection and ERAS program for colorectal cancer and diverticular disease at the Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust. Among these, 24 patients received local wound infiltration plus TAP block (TAP block group) and 24 patients received local wound infiltration (control group). Results: No differences were observed in baseline patient characteristics, clinical variables and surgical procedures between the two groups. Local wound infiltration plus TAP block allowed to achieve pain control despite a reduced use of opioid analgesics (P\ua0=\ua00.009). The adoption of TAP block resulted beneficial on the prevention of postoperative nausea (P\ua0=\ua00.002) and improvement of essential outcomes of ERAS program as recovery of bowel function (P\ua0=\ua00.005), urinary catheter removal (P\ua0=\ua00.003) and capability to tolerate oral diet (P\ua0=\ua00.027). Conclusions: TAP block plus local wound infiltration in the setting of laparoscopic colorectal surgery and ERAS program guarantees a reduced use of opioid analgesics and good pain control allowing the improvement of essential items of enhanced recovery pathways

Procalcitonin levels in surgical patients at risk of candidemia.

Although the majority of cases of sepsis in intensive care unit (ICU) patients are due to bacterial infection, fungal infections are common and their early identification is important so that appropriate treatment can be started. Biomarkers have been used to aid diagnosis of bacterial infections, but their role in fungal infections is less defined. In this study we assessed the value of procalcitonin (PCT) levels for the diagnosis of candidemia or bacteremia in septic patients.Journal ArticleSCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Is compliance with hand disinfection in the intensive care unit related to work experience?

SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program: Experience with 200 cases from a single Italian center

There is increasing evidence that minimally invasive techniques associated with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols reduce surgery-related stress and promote faster recovery after major colorectal surgery. As a single tertiary referral center for colorectal surgery, our aim was to analyze the effects of our ERAS protocol on a heterogeneous population undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.Prospectively collected data from 283 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection at the Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, between March 2014 and March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients' adherence to pre-, intra-, and postoperative ERAS protocol items together with surgical short-term outcomes such as morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate was considered.The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona (CRINF-1034 CESC).During the study period, 200 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the ERAS protocol. In this series, 34% of patients were aged 70 years or older. Rectal resections represented 26% of all cases, with stoma formation performed in 14.5% of patients. Despite such procedural heterogeneity, good short-term results were obtained: by postoperative day (POD) 2, 58.5% of patients had full return of bowel function, while 63.5% and 88% achieved regular soft diet intake and autonomous walking, respectively. Median (range) length of hospital stay was 5.5 days (2-40) with 71% of patients being discharged by POD 6. No postoperative mortality was recorded, and the rate of major complications was 3.5%. During the study period, 6 patients required redo surgery (3%) and 5 patients required rehospitalization within 30 days (2.5%).This study analyzing the results of the fast-track program in our first 200 cases confirms the feasibility and safety of ERAS protocol application within a heterogeneous population undergoing laparoscopic colonic and rectal resection for benign and malignant diseases

sj-docx-1-jtt-10.1177_1357633X231203064 - Supplemental material for iColon, a patient-focused mobile application for perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Results from 444 patients

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-jtt-10.1177_1357633X231203064 for iColon, a patient-focused mobile application for perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Results from 444 patients by Elisa Bertocchi, Giuliano Barugola, Gaia Masini, Massimo Guerriero, Nicola Menestrina, Irene Gentile, Francesca Meoli, Lorenza Sanfilippo, Mario Lauria, Roberta Freoni and Giacomo Ruffo in Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare</p