The #HOPE4LIVER Single-Arm Pivotal Trial for Histotripsy of Primary and Metastatic Liver Tumors

Histotripsy; Primary and metastatic liver tumorsHistotricia; Tumores hepáticos primarios y metastásicosHistotrícia; Tumors hepàtics primaris i metastàticsBackground Histotripsy is a nonthermal, nonionizing, noninvasive, focused US technique that relies on cavitation for mechanical tissue breakdown at the focal point. Preclinical data have shown its safety and technical success in the ablation of liver tumors. Purpose To evaluate the safety and technical success of histotripsy in destroying primary or metastatic liver tumors. Materials and Methods The parallel United States and European Union and England #HOPE4LIVER trials were prospective, multicenter, single-arm studies. Eligible patients were recruited at 14 sites in Europe and the United States from January 2021 to July 2022. Up to three tumors smaller than 3 cm in size could be treated. CT or MRI and clinic visits were performed at 1 week or less preprocedure, at index-procedure, 36 hours or less postprocedure, and 30 days postprocedure. There were co-primary end points of technical success of tumor treatment and absence of procedure-related major complications within 30 days, with performance goals of greater than 70% and less than 25%, respectively. A two-sided 95% Wilson score CI was derived for each end point. Results Forty-four participants (21 from the United States, 23 from the European Union or England; 22 female participants, 22 male participants; mean age, 64 years ± 12 [SD]) with 49 tumors were enrolled and treated. Eighteen participants (41%) had hepatocellular carcinoma and 26 (59%) had non–hepatocellular carcinoma liver metastases. The maximum pretreatment tumor diameter was 1.5 cm ± 0.6 and the maximum post-histotripsy treatment zone diameter was 3.6 cm ± 1.4. Technical success was observed in 42 of 44 treated tumors (95%; 95% CI: 84, 100) and procedure-related major complications were reported in three of 44 participants (7%; 95% CI: 2, 18), both meeting the performance goal. Conclusion The #HOPE4LIVER trials met the co-primary end-point performance goals for technical success and the absence of procedure-related major complications, supporting early clinical adoption

Quantitative Assessment of Liver Stiffness Using Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography in Patients With Chronic Graftâ Versusâ Host Disease After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Pilot Study

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147792/1/jum14717_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147792/2/jum14717.pd

Procedural Competency Training during Diagnostic Radiology Residency: Time to Go beyond “See One, Do One, Teach One”!

Objectives: Achieving procedural competency during diagnostic radiology residency can impact the radiologist\u27s future independent practice after graduation, especially in a private practice setting. However, standardized procedure competency training within most radiology residency programs is lacking, and overall procedural skills are still mainly acquired by the traditional “see one, do one, teach one” methodology. We report the development of a simple standardized procedural training protocol that can easily be adopted by residency programs currently lacking any form of structured procedural training. Materials and Methods: An ad hoc resident procedural competency committee was created in our radiology residency program. A procedural certification protocol was developed by the committee which was composed of attending radiologists from the involved divisions and two chief residents. A road map to achieve procedural competency certification status was finalized. The protocol was then implemented through online commercial software. Results: Our procedural certification protocol took effect in September 2014. We reviewed all resident records from September 2014 to December 2016. Eighteen residents of various levels of training participated in our training protocol. About 72% became certified in paracentesis, 11% in thoracentesis, 83% in feeding tube placement, 55% in lumbar puncture/myelogram, and 77% in tunneled catheter removal. Conclusions: Our single-center experience demonstrates that a simple to adopt structured approach to procedural competency training is feasible and effective. Our “certified” radiology residents were deemed capable of performing those procedures under indirect supervision. The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Patient care, Medical knowledge, and Systems-based practice

Intersection of Immune and Oncometabolic Pathways Drives Cancer Hyperprogression During Immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) can produce durable responses against cancer. We and others have found that a subset of patients experiences paradoxical rapid cancer progression during immunotherapy. It is poorly understood how tumors can accelerate their progression during ICB. In some preclinical models, ICB causes hyperprogressive disease (HPD). While immune exclusion drives resistance to ICB, counterintuitively, patients with HPD and complete response (CR) following ICB manifest comparable levels of tumor-infiltrating CD

LI-RADS: A Conceptual and Historical Review from Its Beginning to Its Recent Integration into AASLD Clinical Practice Guidance

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS®) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the terminology, technique, interpretation, reporting, and data collection of liver observations in individuals at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). LI-RADS is supported and endorsed by the American College of Radiology (ACR). Upon its initial release in 2011, LI-RADS applied only to liver observations identified at CT or MRI. It has since been refined and expanded over multiple updates to now also address ultrasound-based surveillance, contrast-enhanced ultrasound for HCC diagnosis, and CT/MRI for assessing treatment response after locoregional therapy. The LI-RADS 2018 version was integrated into the HCC diagnosis, staging, and management practice guidance of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD). This article reviews the major LI-RADS updates since its 2011 inception and provides an overview of the currently published LI-RADS algorithms

A multicenter assessment of interreader reliability of LI-RADS version 2018 for MRI and CT

Background: Various limitations have impacted research evaluating reader agreement for Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS). Purpose: To assess reader agreement of LI-RADS in an international multi-center, multireader setting using scrollable images. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used de-identified clinical multiphase CT and MRI examinations and reports with at least one untreated observation from six institutions and three countries; only qualifying examinations were submitted. Examination dates were October 2017 – August 2018 at the coordinating center. One untreated observation per examination was randomly selected using observation identifiers, and its clinically assigned features were extracted from the report. The corresponding LI-RADS v2018 category was computed as a re-scored clinical read. Each examination was randomly assigned to two of 43 research readers who independently scored the observation. Agreement for an ordinal modified four-category LI-RADS scale (LR-1/2, LR-3, LR-4, LR-5/M/tumor in vein) was computed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Agreement was also computed for dichotomized malignancy (LR-4/LR5/LR-M/LR-tumor in vein), LR-5, and LR-M. Agreement was compared between researchversus-research reads and research-versus-clinical reads. Results: 484 patients (mean age, 62 years ±10 [SD]; 156 women; 93 CT, 391 MRI) were included. ICCs for ordinal LI-RADS, dichotomized malignancy, LR-5, and LR-M were 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.74), 0.63 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.71), 0.58 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.66), and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.31, 0.61) respectively. Research-versus-research reader agreement was higher than research-versus-clinical agreement for modified four-category LI-RADS (ICC, 0.68 vs. 0.62, P = .03) and for dichotomized malignancy (ICC, 0.63 vs. 0.53, P = .005), but not for LR-5 (P = .14) or LR-M (P = .94). Conclusion: There was moderate agreement for Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System v2018 overall. For some comparisons, research-versus-research reader agreement was higher than research-versus-clinical reader agreement, indicating differences between the clinical and research environments that warrant further study

Small intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinomas as mimics of hepatocellular carcinoma in multiphasic CT

PURPOSE: Liver transplant guidelines for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) do not mandate pathologic confirmation; instead, \u27classic\u27 imaging features alone are deemed satisfactory. Intrahepatic peripheral mass forming cholangiocarcinoma (IHPMCC) is a relative contraindication for transplantation due to high rate of recurrence and poor prognosis. This study examines the imaging findings of IHPMCC, to aid in the identification and differentiation from potentially confounding cases of HCC. METHODS: After IRB approval, 43 tissue-proven cases of IHPMCC on multiphase CT were retrospectively reviewed by 2 fellowship-trained radiologists. Tumor size, presence of cirrhosis, tumor capsule, vascular invasion, tumor markers, and enhancement pattern were assessed. A grading system was assigned as determined by enhancement pattern to background liver on arterial, portal venous, and equilibrium phases, ranging from typical HCC to typical IHPMCC enhancement pattern. RESULTS: Analysis based on our grading system shows 5 (11.6%) tumors demonstrating grade 1-2 enhancement, 9 (21%) grade 3-4 enhancement, and 29 (67.4%) grade 5 enhancement. Kruskal-Wallis test comparing CA19-9 between the five groups, Wilcoxin rank-sum test comparing tumor markers with presence or absence of tumor capsule, vascular invasion and cirrhosis, and nonparametric Pearson\u27s correlation coefficient comparing tumor markers to tumor size were not statistically significant (p \u3e 0.05). CONCLUSION: Typical enhancement pattern of IHPMCC consisting of arterial phase hypoenhancement with progressive, centripetal-delayed enhancement is present in the majority of cases (68%). Five cases (11.7%) showed enhancement features potentially mimicking HCC, all of which are under 3.5 cm in size. Thus, small hyperenhancing lesions in a cirrhotic liver should be carefully scrutinized in light of differing therapy options from HCC, particularly in transplant situations

Small intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinomas as mimics of hepatocellular carcinoma in multiphasic CT

PURPOSE: Liver transplant guidelines for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) do not mandate pathologic confirmation; instead, \u27classic\u27 imaging features alone are deemed satisfactory. Intrahepatic peripheral mass forming cholangiocarcinoma (IHPMCC) is a relative contraindication for transplantation due to high rate of recurrence and poor prognosis. This study examines the imaging findings of IHPMCC, to aid in the identification and differentiation from potentially confounding cases of HCC. METHODS: After IRB approval, 43 tissue-proven cases of IHPMCC on multiphase CT were retrospectively reviewed by 2 fellowship-trained radiologists. Tumor size, presence of cirrhosis, tumor capsule, vascular invasion, tumor markers, and enhancement pattern were assessed. A grading system was assigned as determined by enhancement pattern to background liver on arterial, portal venous, and equilibrium phases, ranging from typical HCC to typical IHPMCC enhancement pattern. RESULTS: Analysis based on our grading system shows 5 (11.6%) tumors demonstrating grade 1-2 enhancement, 9 (21%) grade 3-4 enhancement, and 29 (67.4%) grade 5 enhancement. Kruskal-Wallis test comparing CA19-9 between the five groups, Wilcoxin rank-sum test comparing tumor markers with presence or absence of tumor capsule, vascular invasion and cirrhosis, and nonparametric Pearson\u27s correlation coefficient comparing tumor markers to tumor size were not statistically significant (p \u3e 0.05). CONCLUSION: Typical enhancement pattern of IHPMCC consisting of arterial phase hypoenhancement with progressive, centripetal-delayed enhancement is present in the majority of cases (68%). Five cases (11.7%) showed enhancement features potentially mimicking HCC, all of which are under 3.5 cm in size. Thus, small hyperenhancing lesions in a cirrhotic liver should be carefully scrutinized in light of differing therapy options from HCC, particularly in transplant situations

Simulation center training as a means to improve resident performance in percutaneous noncontinuous CT-guided fluoroscopic procedures with dose reduction

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted simulation-based resident training for CT-guided fluoroscopic procedures by measuring procedural and technical skills, radiation dose, and procedure times before and after simulation training. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A prospective analysis included 40 radiology residents and eight staff radiologists. Residents took an online pretest to assess baseline procedural knowledge. Second-through fourth-year residents\u27 baseline technical skills with a procedural phantom were evaluated. First-through third-year residents then underwent formal didactic and simulation-based procedural and technical training with one of two interventional radiologists and followed the training with 1 month of supervised phantom-based practice. Thereafter, residents underwent final written and practical examinations. The practical examination included essential items from a 20-point checklist, including site and side marking, consent, time-out, and sterile technique along with a technical skills portion assessing pedal steps, radiation dose, needle redirects, and procedure time. RESULTS: The results indicated statistically significant improvement in procedural and technical skills after simulation training. For residents, the median number of pedal steps decreased by three (p=0.001), median dose decreased by 15.4 mGy (p CONCLUSION: CT simulation training decreases procedural time, decreases radiation dose, and improves resident efficiency and confidence, which may transfer to clinical practice with improved patient care and safety

Radiation Therapies for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/168315/1/cld1060.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/168315/2/cld1060_am.pd