CAR T Cell Therapy of Non-hematopoietic Malignancies: Detours on the Road to Clinical Success

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cells represent a breakthrough in personalized medicine. In this strategy, a patient's own T lymphocytes are genetically reprogrammed to encode a synthetic receptor that binds a tumor antigen, allowing T cells to recognize and kill antigen-expressing cancer cells. As a result of complete and durable responses in individuals who are refractory to standard of care therapy, CAR T cells directed against the CD19 protein have been granted United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval as a therapy for treatment of pediatric and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Human trials of CAR T cells targeting CD19 or B cell maturation antigen in multiple myeloma have also reported early successes. However, a clear and consistently reproducible demonstration of the clinical efficacy of CAR T cells in the setting of solid tumors has not been reported to date. Here, we review the history and status of CAR T cell therapy for solid tumors, potential T cell-intrinsic determinants of response and resistance as well as extrinsic obstacles to the success of this approach for much more prevalent non-hematopoietic malignancies. In addition, we summarize recent strategies and innovations that aim to augment the potency of CAR T cells in the face of multiple immunosuppressive barriers operative within the solid tumor microenvironment. Advances in the field of CAR T cell biology over the coming years in the areas of safety, reliability and efficacy against non-hematopoietic cancers will ultimately determine how transformative adoptive T cell therapy will be in the broader battle against cancer

Divergent roles for antigenic drive in the aetiology of primary versus dasatinib-associated CD8(+) TCR-Vβ(+) expansions

CD8(+) T-cell expansions are the primary manifestation of T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGLL), which is frequently accompanied by neutropenia and rheumatoid arthritis, and also occur as a secondary phenomenon in leukemia patients treated with dasatinib, notably in association with various drug-induced side-effects. However, the mechanisms that underlie the genesis and maintenance of expanded CD8(+) T-cell receptor (TCR)-V beta(+) populations in these patient groups have yet to be fully defined. In this study, we performed a comprehensive phenotypic and clonotypic assessment of expanded (TCR-V beta(+)) and residual (TCR-V beta(-)) CD8(+) T-cell populations in T-LGLL and dasatinib-treated chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients. The dominant CD8(+) TCR-V beta(+) expansions in T-LGLL patients were largely monoclonal and highly differentiated, whereas the dominant CD8(+) TCR-V beta(+) expansions in dasatinib-treated CML patients were oligoclonal or polyclonal, and displayed a broad range of memory phenotypes. These contrasting features suggest divergent roles for antigenic drive in the immunopathogenesis of primary versus dasatinib-associated CD8(+) TCR-V beta(+) expansions.Peer reviewe

Increased Urinary Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 in Renal Transplant Patients with Diabetes

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is expressed in the kidney and may be a renoprotective enzyme, since it converts angiotensin (Ang) II to Ang-(1-7). ACE2 has been detected in urine from patients with chronic kidney disease. We measured urinary ACE2 activity and protein levels in renal transplant patients (age 54 yrs, 65% male, 38% diabetes, n = 100) and healthy controls (age 45 yrs, 26% male, n = 50), and determined factors associated with elevated urinary ACE2 in the patients. Urine from transplant subjects was also assayed for ACE mRNA and protein. No subjects were taking inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system. Urinary ACE2 levels were significantly higher in transplant patients compared to controls (p = 0.003 for ACE2 activity, and p≤0.001 for ACE2 protein by ELISA or western analysis). Transplant patients with diabetes mellitus had significantly increased urinary ACE2 activity and protein levels compared to non-diabetics (p<0.001), while ACE2 mRNA levels did not differ. Urinary ACE activity and protein were significantly increased in diabetic transplant subjects, while ACE mRNA levels did not differ from non-diabetic subjects. After adjusting for confounding variables, diabetes was significantly associated with urinary ACE2 activity (p = 0.003) and protein levels (p<0.001), while female gender was associated with urinary mRNA levels for both ACE2 and ACE. These data indicate that urinary ACE2 is increased in renal transplant recipients with diabetes, possibly due to increased shedding from tubular cells. Urinary ACE2 could be a marker of renal renin-angiotensin system activation in these patients

Engineered T Cell Therapies from a Drug Development Viewpoint

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Recent advances in cellular therapy have demonstrated that this platform has the potential to give patients with certain cancers a second chance at life. Unlike chemical compounds and proteins, cells are living, self-replicating drugs that can be engineered to possess exquisite specificity. For example, T cells can be genetically modified to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), endowing them with the capacity to recognize and kill tumor cells and form a memory pool that is ready to strike back against persisting malignant cells. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART19s) have demonstrated a remarkable degree of clinical efficacy for certain malignancies. The process of developing CART19 essentially follows the conventional “one gene, one drug, one disease” paradigm derived from Paul Ehrlich’s “magic bullet” concept. With major players within the pharmaceutical industry joining forces to commercialize this new category of “living drugs,” it is useful to use CART19 as an example to examine the similarities and differences in its development, compared with that of a conventional drug. In this way, we can assimilate existing knowledge and identify the most effective approach for advancing similar strategies. This article reviews the use of biomarker-based assays to guide the optimization of CAR constructs, preclinical studies, and the evaluation of clinical efficacy; adverse effects (AEs); and CART19 cellular kinetics. Advanced technologies and computational tools that enable the discovery of optimal targets, novel CAR binding domains, and biomarkers predicting clinical response and AEs are also discussed. We believe that the success of CART19 will lead to the development of other engineered T cell therapies in the same manner that the discovery of arsphenamine initiated the era of synthetic pharmaceuticals. Keywords: Engineered T cell therapies, Chimeric antigen receptor, Drug development process, Biomarkers, CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor, Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell

Decade-long Remissions of Leukemia Sustained by the Persistence of Activated CD4 CAR T Cells

The adoptive transfer of T cells reprogrammed to target tumor cells has demonstrated significant potential in various malignancies. However, little is known about the long-term memory potential and the clonal stability of the infused cells. Here, we studied the fate of CD19 redirected chimeric antigen receptor (CAR19) T-cells in two leukemia patients who achieved and sustained a complete remission almost a decade ago. CAR T cells were still detectable 9+ years post-infusion. Surprisingly, a prominent, highly activated CD4+ population developed in both subjects in the years post-infusion, dominating the CAR T cell population at the late time points. This transition was reflected in the stabilization of the clonal make-up of CAR T cells with a repertoire dominated by few clones. Single-cell profiling of CAR T-cells obtained 9 years post-infusion demonstrated that these long-persisting CD4+ CAR T cells exhibited cytotoxic characteristics along with strong evidence of ongoing functional activation and proliferation. Given data that CD19 directed CAR T with a CD28 signaling domain do not persist long term, our data provide important insight into the development of long-term anti-tumor responses necessary for sustained remission in leukemia following CAR T-cell therapy

Allogeneic virus-specific T cells with HLA alloreactivity do not produce GVHD in human subjects

Adoptive transfer of viral antigen-specific memory T cells can reconstitute antiviral immunity, but in a recent report a majority of virus-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) lines showed in vitro cross-reactivity against allo-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules as measured by interferon-γ secretion. We therefore reviewed our clinical experience with adoptive transfer of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation donor-derived virus-specific CTLs in 153 recipients, including 73 instances where there was an HLA mismatch. There was no de novo acute graft-versus-host disease after infusion, and incidence of graft-versus-host disease reactivation was low and not significantly different in recipients of matched or mismatched CTL. However, we found that virus-specific T cell lines recognized up to 10% of a panel of 44 HLA disparate targets, indicating that virus-specific T cells can have cross-reactivity with HLA-mismatched targets in vitro. These data indicate that the adoptive transfer of partially HLA-mismatched virus-specific CTL is safe despite in vitro recognition of recipient HLA molecules