Accelerated process development and stockpile for MERS, LASSA AND NIPAH viral vaccine

CEPI (the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation) was launched in January 2017. The global need for CEPI emerged after the devastating Ebola crisis in 2014/15 that caused over 11,000 deaths and had an economic impact of at least $2.8 billion in the worst-affected countries alone[1]. The collective response to Ebola had fallen short, and it was evident we needed a better system to produce proven vaccines against known epidemic threats. A year ago at Davos, the governments of India and Norway and Guinea; the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome and the World Economic Forum backed the creation of CEPI, an innovative partnership of public, private, philanthropic and civil society organizations, to provide a global insurance policy to defend against future epidemics. Through a call for proposal to vaccine developers, CEPI launched a portfolio of projects covering the development of MERS, Lassa and Nipah viral vaccines, based on WHO blueprint list of pathogens and in addition, a number of platform technologies are currently evaluated for the development of rapid response against unknown pathogens. In this paper, we introduce the CEPI process development, the vaccine technologies and stockpile strategies for MERS, Lassa and Nipah candidates in the CEPI portfolio. The cell lines, process and scale up portfolio strategies will be reviewed for emergency settings vs conventional vaccine process development. The emergency stockpile development strategy will be presented in this paper. In addition, we also highlight the critical areas of dialogue with regulatory authorities for the enhancement of use of experimental vaccine candidates in emergency settings for efficacy trials. [1] http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/macroeconomics/publication/2014-2015-west-africa-ebola-crisis-impact-updat

Antivirals for influenza-Like Illness? A randomised Controlled trial of Clinical and Cost effectiveness in primary CarE (ALIC4 E): the ALIC4 E protocol

INTRODUCTION: Effective management of seasonal and pandemic influenza is a high priority internationally. Guidelines in many countries recommend antiviral treatment for older people and individuals with comorbidity at increased risk of complications. However, antivirals are not often prescribed in primary care in Europe, partly because its clinical and cost effectiveness has been insufficiently demonstrated by non-industry funded and pragmatic studies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Antivirals for influenza-Like Illness? An rCt of Clinical and Cost effectiveness in primary CarE is a European multinational, multicentre, open-labelled, non-industry funded, pragmatic, adaptive-platform, randomised controlled trial. Initial trial arms will be best usual primary care and best usual primary care plus treatment with oseltamivir for 5 days. We aim to recruit at least 2500 participants ≥1 year presenting with influenza-like illness (ILI), with symptom duration ≤72 hours in primary care over three consecutive periods of confirmed high influenza incidence. Participant outcomes will be followed up to 28 days by diary and telephone. The primary objective is to determine whether adding antiviral treatment to best usual primary care is effective in reducing time to return to usual daily activity with fever, headache and muscle ache reduced to minor severity or less. Secondary objectives include estimating cost-effectiveness, benefits in subgroups according to age (64 years), severity of symptoms at presentation (low, medium and high), comorbidity (yes/no), duration of symptoms (≤48 hours/>48-72 hours), complications (hospital admission and pneumonia), use of additional prescribed medication including antibiotics, use of over-the-counter medicines and self-management of ILI symptoms. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics committee (REC) approval was granted by the NRES Committee South Central (Oxford B) and Clinical Trial Authority (CTA) approval by The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. All participating countries gained national REC and CTA approval as required. Dissemination of results will be through peer-reviewed scientific journals and conference presentations

Virology, epidemiology, immunology and vaccine development of SARS-CoV-2, update after nine months of pandemic

This International Alliance for Biological Standardization COVID-19 webinar was organized to provide an update on the virology, epidemiology and immunology of, and the vaccine development for SARS-CoV-2, none months after COVID-19 was declared a public health emergency of international concern. It brought together a broad range of international stakeholders, including academia, regulators, funders and industry, with a considerable delegation from low- and middle-income countries.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

SARS-CoV-2: Virology, epidemiology, immunology and vaccine development

This first International Alliance for Biological Standardization Covid-19 webinar brought together a broad range of international stakeholders, including academia, regulators, funders and industry, with a considerable delegation from low- and middle-income countries, to discuss the virology, epidemiology and immunology of, and the vaccine development for SARS-CoV-2.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Integrated immunogenicity analysis of a tetravalent dengue vaccine up to 4 y after vaccination

Two large pivotal phase III studies demonstrated the efficacy of the tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV; Dengvaxia®, Sanofi Pasteur) against all dengue serotypes. Here we present an unprecedented integrated summary of the immunogenicity of CYD-TDV to identify the parameters driving the neutralizing humoral immune response and evolution over time. We summarized the immunogenicity profiles of a 3-dose schedule of CYD-TDV administered 6 months apart across 10 phase II and 6 phase III trials undertaken in dengue endemic and non-endemic countries. Dengue neutralizing antibody titers in sera were determined at centralized laboratories using the 50% plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT50) at baseline, 28 d after the third dose, and annually thereafter for up to 4 y after the third dose in some studies. CYD-TDV elicits neutralizing antibody responses against all 4 dengue serotypes; geometric mean titers (GMTs) increased from baseline to post-dose 3. GMTs were influenced by several parameters including age, baseline dengue seropositivity and region. In the 2 pivotal studies, GMTs decreased initially during the first 2 y post-dose 3 but appear to stabilize or slightly increase again in the third year. GMTs persisted 1.2–3.2-fold higher than baseline levels for up to 4 y post-dose 3 in other studies undertaken in dengue endemic countries. Our integrated analysis captures the fullness of the CYD-TDV immunogenicity profile across studies, age groups and regions; by presenting the available data in this way general trends and substantial outliers within each grouping can be easily identified. CYD-TDV elicits neutralizing antibody responses against all dengue serotypes, with differences by age and endemicity, which persist above baseline levels in endemic countries

IABS/CEPI platform technology webinar: Is it possible to reduce the vaccine development time?

The International Alliance for Biological Standardization and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations organized a joint webinar on the use of platform technologies for vaccine development. To tackle new emerging infectious diseases, including SARS-CoV-2, rapid response platforms, using the same basic components as a backbone, yet adaptable for use against different pathogens by inserting new genetic or protein sequences, are essential. Furthermore, it is evident that development of platform technologies needs to continue, due to the emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2. The objective of the meeting was to discuss techniques for platform manufacturing that have been used for COVID-19 vaccine development, with input from regulatory authorities on their experiences with, and expectations of, the platforms. Industry and regulators have been very successful in cooperating, having completed the whole process from development to licensing at an unprecedented speed. However, we should learn from the experiences, to be able to be even faster when a next pandemic of disease X occurs