Postoperative Adverse Outcomes in Intellectually Disabled Surgical Patients: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

Intellectually disabled patients have various comorbidities, but their risks of adverse surgical outcomes have not been examined. This study assesses pre-existing comorbidities, adjusted risks of postoperative major morbidities and mortality in intellectually disabled surgical patients.A nationwide population-based study was conducted in patients who underwent inpatient major surgery in Taiwan between 2004 and 2007. Four controls for each patient were randomly selected from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Preoperative major comorbidities, postoperative major complications and 30-day in-hospital mortality were compared between patients with and without intellectual disability. Use of medical services also was analyzed. Adjusted odds ratios using multivariate logistic regression analyses with 95% confidence intervals were applied to verify intellectual disability's impact.Controls were compared with 3983 surgical patients with intellectual disability. Risks for postoperative major complications were increased in patients with intellectual disability, including acute renal failure (odds ratio 3.81, 95% confidence interval 2.28 to 6.37), pneumonia (odds ratio 2.01, 1.61 to 2.49), postoperative bleeding (odds ratio 1.35, 1.09 to 1.68) and septicemia (odds ratio 2.43, 1.85 to 3.21) without significant differences in overall mortality. Disability severity was positively correlated with postoperative septicemia risk. Medical service use was also significantly higher in surgical patients with intellectual disability.Intellectual disability significantly increases the risk of overall major complications after major surgery. Our findings show a need for integrated and revised protocols for postoperative management to improve care for intellectually disabled surgical patients

Interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-12 responses to Chlamydia trachomatis infection in adolescents

Chlamydia trachomatis infects epithelial cells at the mucosal surface. While in vitro and animal studies have shown changes in mucosal T(H)1-associated cytokines in the presence of C. trachomatis infection and with its progression to the upper genital tract or clearance, in vivo cytokine responses to chlamydial infection in humans are not well understood. Using a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), we examined the endocervical production of two T(H)1-associated cytokines, i.e. interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-12, in relation to C. trachomatis infection in adolescents. At a randomly selected visit for 396 females, median endocervical IL-2 levels were significantly lower (190 versus 283 pg/ml, P = 0·02) and median IL-12 levels significantly higher (307 versus 132 pg/ml, P < 0·001) in subjects testing positive versus negative for C. trachomatis. These divergent T(H)1-associated cytokine responses were: (1) confirmed in paired analyses of 96 individuals before and after infection within 6-month intervals, (2) reversible in 97 patients who cleared infection during consecutive visits, (3) not attributable to sociodemographic factors or other genital infections and (4) independent of common genetic variants at the IL2 and IL12B loci associated previously with differential gene expression. From these findings we infer that increased IL-12 and decreased IL-2, observed commonly during mucosal inflammation, are important features of mucosal immune defence against C. trachomatis infection

Criteria for definition of a complex abdominal wall hernia

Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE: A clear definition of "complex (abdominal wall) hernia" is missing, though the term is often used. Practically all "complex hernia" literature is retrospective and lacks proper description of the population. There is need for clarification and classification to improve patient care and allow comparison of different surgical approaches. The aim of this study was to reach consensus on criteria used to define a patient with "complex" hernia. METHODS: Three consensus meetings were convened by surgeons with expertise in complex abdominal wall hernias, aimed at laying down criteria that can be used to define "complex hernia" patients, and to divide patients in severity classes. To aid discussion, literature review was performed to identify hernia classification systems, and to find evidence for patient and hernia variables that influence treatment and/or prognosis. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 22 patient and hernia variables for "complex" hernia criteria inclusion which were grouped under four categories: "Size and location", "Contamination/soft tissue condition", "Patient history/risk factors", and "Clinical scenario". These variables were further divided in three patient severity classes ('Minor', 'Moderate', and 'Major') to provide guidance for peri-operative planning and measures, the risk of a complicated post-operative course, and the extent of financial costs associated with treatment of these hernia patients. CONCLUSION: Common criteria that can be used in defining and describing "complex" (abdominal wall) hernia patients have been identified and divided under four categories and three severity classes. Next step would be to create and validate treatment algorithms to guide the choice of surgical technique including mesh type for the various complex hernias