The New Zealand 1986 very low birth weight cohort as young adults: mapping the road ahead

Background: Very low birth weight (less than 1500 g) is associated with increased morbidity and costs of health care in childhood. Emerging evidence suggests these infants face a range of health and social problems as young adults. We studied all New Zealand very low birth weight infants born in 1986 (when 58 % were exposed to antenatal corticosteroids) in infancy, with later follow-up at 7 to 8 years and 23 to 24 years. We now aim to assess the cohort at 26–28 years compared with controls. Methods/design The case sample will comprise a minimum of 250 members of the 1986 New Zealand national very low birth weight cohort (77 % of survivors). Outcomes will be compared with a control group of 100 young adults born at term in 1986. Following written informed consent, participants will travel to Christchurch for 2 days of assessments undertaken by experienced staff. Medical assessments include growth measures, vision, respiratory function, blood pressure and echocardiogram, renal function, dental examination and blood tests. Cognitive and neuropsychological functioning will be assessed with standard tests, and mental health and social functioning by participant interview. A telephone interview will be conducted with a parent or significant other person nominated by the respondent to gain a further perspective on the young person’s health and functioning. All those born at less than 28 weeks’ gestation, plus a random subset of the cohort to a total of 150 cases and 50 controls, will be offered cranial magnetic-resonance imaging. Statistical analysis will examine comparison with controls and long-term trajectories for the very low birth weight cohort. Discussion The research will provide crucial New Zealand data on the young adult outcomes for very low birth weight infants and address gaps in the international literature, particularly regarding cardiovascular, respiratory, visual and neurocognitive outcomes. These data will inform future neonatal care, provide evidence-based guidelines for care of preterm graduates transitioning to adult care, and help shape health education and social policies for this high risk group. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612000995875. Registered 1 October 2012 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-015-0413-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users

Oral Health Among Older Adults With Complex Needs Living in the Community and in Aged Residential Care Facilities within New Zealand

Objectives To describe the oral health status and dental service use of older adults with complex needs living within the community and aged residential care (ARC) facility settings, and to determine associations between dental service utilization and sociodemographic variables. Design Secondary analysis of 2 continuously recruited national cohorts. Setting and Participants Adults aged ≥65 years having standardized assessments between July 1, 2012, and May 31, 2018, within New Zealand and who provided consent. Methods All community-living older people with complex needs undergo a standardized assessment, using the Home Care International Residential Assessment Instrument (interRAI-HC), whereas all ARC facility residents undergo Long Term Care Facilities assessments (interRAI-LTCF). Anonymized data from consenting participants were extracted. Cross-sectional analyses of oral health status and dental service use variables employed logistic regression models, whereas longitudinal analysis of factors influencing dental service utilization employed binary generalized estimating equation models. Results Overall, 144,380 interRAI-HC assessments from 97,229 participants, and 195,549 interRAI-LTCF assessments from 62,798 participants were eligible. At first assessment, their average age was 81.9 years (range: 65-109 years) and 84.4 years (range: 65-110 years), respectively. Approximately 65% of the participants wore dentures; 9% had broken, fragmented, loose, or otherwise nonintact natural teeth; and 10% reported difficulties chewing. Overall, only 25.3% of community-dwelling older adults and 17.5% of ARC residents had a dental examination within the previous year. Stark inequalities were observed with, for example, Māori participants having adjusted odds 3.14 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.88, 3.42] and 2.08 (95% CI: 1.81, 2.39) of not having a dental examination in community and ARC facility settings compared with their New Zealand European counterparts. Conclusions and Implications Heavy and unequal oral health burdens were observed among older adults with complex needs, together with low dental service uptake. New Zealand needs an oral health policy for older adults