17 research outputs found
Supplementary Material for: Standardized Renal Endpoints for Perioperative Clinical Trials: The Standardized Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine Initiative
<p>Perioperative acute kidney injury is a common problem. While clinical
trials seek to evaluate the impact of interventions on a variety of
primary and secondary endpoints with the aim of implementing this
knowledge to improve perioperative outcomes, the use of valid and
relevant endpoints within clinical trials is of critical importance to
achieving this goal. Suitable endpoints must be validated for the study
population and in light of the clinical context under investigation
while also considering regulatory requirements that govern the licensing
of new therapeutic agents as well as the values of patients whose
outcomes we seek to improve. Heterogeneity in perioperative clinical
trial endpoints and their definitions limits the ability to compare and
interpret differences in outcomes across studies or to pool outcomes
from different studies in meta-analysis. The Standardized Endpoints in
Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative is an international
collaboration whose goal is to identify and recommend a suite of clearly
and precisely defined endpoints across multiple domains, specifically
suited for use in perioperative clinical trials. The current review
describes the rationale, goals and the planned pathway of the StEP renal
subgroup. Development of a set of standardized and core renal
endpoints, valid and relevant for use in the perioperative context,
precisely defined and yet with sufficient flexibility to encourage broad
uptake and application should facilitate high-quality and
practice-changing perioperative research into the future.</p
Experimental and numerical study of chemiluminescent species in low-pressure flames
Kathrotia T, Riedel U, Seipel A, Moshammer K, Brockhinke A. Experimental and numerical study of chemiluminescent species in low-pressure flames. APPLIED PHYSICS B. 2012;107(3):571-584
Non-target impacts of poison baiting for predator control in Australia
1. Mammalian predators are controlled by poison baiting in many parts of the world, often to alleviate their impacts on agriculture or the environment. Although predator control can have substantial benefits, the poisons used may also be potentially harmful to other wildlife.
2. Impacts on non-target species must be minimized, but can be difficult to predict or quantify. Species and individuals vary in their sensitivity to toxins and their propensity to consume poison baits, while populations vary in their resilience. Wildlife populations can accrue benefits from predator control, which outweigh the occasional deaths of non-target animals. We review recent advances in Australia, providing a framework for assessing non-target effects of poisoning operations and for developing techniques to minimize such effects. We also emphasize that weak or circumstantial evidence of non-target effects can be misleading.
3. Weak evidence that poison baiting presents a potential risk to non-target species comes from measuring the sensitivity of species to the toxin in the laboratory. More convincing evidence may be obtained by quantifying susceptibility in the field. This requires detailed information on the propensity of animals to locate and consume poison baits, as well as the likelihood of mortality if baits are consumed. Still stronger evidence may be obtained if predator baiting causes non-target mortality in the field (with toxin detected by post-mortem examination). Conclusive proof of a negative impact on populations of non-target species can be obtained only if any observed non-target mortality is followed by sustained reductions in population density.
4. Such proof is difficult to obtain and the possibility of a population-level impact cannot be reliably confirmed or dismissed without rigorous trials. In the absence of conclusive evidence, wildlife managers should adopt a precautionary approach which seeks to minimize potential risk to non-target individuals, while clarifying population-level effects through continued research