688 research outputs found

    Experimental Study of the Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability on Inclined Interface

    Get PDF
    The RichtmyerMeshkov instability (RMI) is a hydrodynamic instability resulting from an impulsive acceleration of a density gradient. This instability was first described in the theoretical work of Richtmyer [2], and later in the experimental work of Meshkov [3]. The two primary ingredients for the RMI are an impulsive acceleration which takes the form of an instantaneous pressure gradient, and a fluid interface which generates a density gradient that is misaligned with the pressure gradient. To further our investigation of the RMI an initial condition experiment needed to be conducted. At the Texas A&M Shock Tube and Advanced Mixing Lab (STAML) there is a Mach 3 capable shock tube, used to study the RMI. It was necessary to study the initial conditions of the interface to understand its effects on the development of the RMI at post-shocked times. From this we were able to determine characteristic flow qualities present on the interface prior to the shock. Within the initial conditions investigation was a qualitative study conducted to determine the vorticity of the interface. The vorticity study was to show how much energy the shock wave deposits, and aid in development of a controlled perturbation of the interface. In the case of the qualitative vorticity study, little was learned due to problems encountered involving Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) imaging. However, a method for controlled perturbation techniques was discovered involving the flow characteristics at the interface

    A novel approach to assessing the ecosystem-wide impacts of reintroductions

    Get PDF
    Reintroducing a species to an ecosystem can have significant impacts on the recipient ecological community. Although reintroductions can have striking and positive outcomes, they also carry risks; many well intentioned conservation actions have had surprising and unsatisfactory outcomes. A range of network-based mathematical methods have been developed to make quantitative predictions of how communities will respond to management interventions. These methods are based on the limited knowledge of which species interact with each other and in what way. However, expert knowledge isn’t perfect and can only take models so far. Fortunately, other types of data, such as abundance time-series, is often available, but, to date, no quantitative method exists to integrate these various data types into these models, allowing more precise ecosystem-wide predictions. In this paper, we develop mathematical methods that combine time-series data of multiple species with knowledge of species interactions and we apply it to proposed reintroductions at Booderee National Park in Australia. There have been large fluctuations in species abundances at Booderee National Park in recent history, following intense feral fox (Vulpes vulpes) control – including the local extinction of the greater glider (Petauroides volans). These fluctuations can provide information about the system isn’t readily obtained from a stable system, and we use them to inform models that we then use to predict potential outcomes of eastern quoll (Dasyurus viverrinus) and long-nosed potoroo (Potorous tridactylus) reintroductions. One of the key species of conservation concern in the park is the eastern bristlebird (Dasyornis brachypterus), and we find that long-nosed potoroo introduction would have very little impact on the eastern bristlebird population, while the eastern quoll introduction increased the likelihood of eastern bristlebird decline, although that depends on the strength and form of any possible interaction.We thank the ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The National Environmental Research Project Decisions Hub and an ARC Linkage Project (LP160100496) for funding. CB is the recipient of a John Stocker Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Science and Industry Endowment Fund. MB is supported by an ARC Future Fellowship (FT170100274). EMM is a current ARC Future Fellowship (FT170100140) and was supported by an ARC DECRA Fellowship for the majority of this work

    Velocity Segregation and Systematic Biases In Velocity Dispersion Estimates With the SPT-GMOS Spectroscopic Survey

    Get PDF
    The velocity distribution of galaxies in clusters is not universal; rather, galaxies are segregated according to their spectral type and relative luminosity. We examine the velocity distributions of different populations of galaxies within 89 Sunyaev Zel'dovich (SZ) selected galaxy clusters spanning 0.28<z<1.08 0.28 < z < 1.08. Our sample is primarily draw from the SPT-GMOS spectroscopic survey, supplemented by additional published spectroscopy, resulting in a final spectroscopic sample of 4148 galaxy spectra---2868 cluster members. The velocity dispersion of star-forming cluster galaxies is 17±417\pm4% greater than that of passive cluster galaxies, and the velocity dispersion of bright (m<m0.5m < m^{*}-0.5) cluster galaxies is 11±411\pm4% lower than the velocity dispersion of our total member population. We find good agreement with simulations regarding the shape of the relationship between the measured velocity dispersion and the fraction of passive vs. star-forming galaxies used to measure it, but we find a small offset between this relationship as measured in data and simulations in which suggests that our dispersions are systematically low by as much as 3\% relative to simulations. We argue that this offset could be interpreted as a measurement of the effective velocity bias that describes the ratio of our observed velocity dispersions and the intrinsic velocity dispersion of dark matter particles in a published simulation result. Measuring velocity bias in this way suggests that large spectroscopic surveys can improve dispersion-based mass-observable scaling relations for cosmology even in the face of velocity biases, by quantifying and ultimately calibrating them out.Comment: Accepted to ApJ; 21 pages, 11 figures, 5 table

    Supermassive Black Hole Feedback

    Full text link
    Understanding the processes that drive galaxy formation and shape the observed properties of galaxies is one of the most interesting and challenging frontier problems of modern astrophysics. We now know that the evolution of galaxies is critically shaped by the energy injection from accreting supermassive black holes (SMBHs). However, it is unclear how exactly the physics of this feedback process affects galaxy formation and evolution. In particular, a major challenge is unraveling how the energy released near the SMBHs is distributed over nine orders of magnitude in distance throughout galaxies and their immediate environments. The best place to study the impact of SMBH feedback is in the hot atmospheres of massive galaxies, groups, and galaxy clusters, which host the most massive black holes in the Universe, and where we can directly image the impact of black holes on their surroundings. We identify critical questions and potential measurements that will likely transform our understanding of the physics of SMBH feedback and how it shapes galaxies, through detailed measurements of (i) the thermodynamic and velocity fluctuations in the intracluster medium (ICM) as well as (ii) the composition of the bubbles inflated by SMBHs in the centers of galaxy clusters, and their influence on the cluster gas and galaxy growth, using the next generation of high spectral and spatial resolution X-ray and microwave telescopes.Comment: 10 pages, submitted to the Astro2020 decada

    The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 statement

    Get PDF
    We developed a reporting guideline to provide authors with guidance about what should be reported when writing a paper for publication in a scientific journal using a particular type of research design: the single-case experimental design. This report describes the methods used to develop the Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016. As a result of 2 online surveys and a 2-day meeting of experts, the SCRIBE 2016 checklist was developed, which is a set of 26 items that authors need to address when writing about single-case research. This article complements the more detailed SCRIBE 2016 Explanation and Elaboration article (Tate et al., 2016) that provides a rationale for each of the items and examples of adequate reporting from the literature. Both these resources will assist authors to prepare reports of single-case research with clarity, completeness, accuracy, and transparency. They will also provide journal reviewers and editors with a practical checklist against which such reports may be critically evaluated. We recommend that the SCRIBE 2016 is used by authors preparing manuscripts describing single-case research for publication, as well as journal reviewers and editors who are evaluating such manuscripts.Funding for the SCRIBE project was provided by the Lifetime Care and Support Authority of New South Wales, Australia. The funding body was not involved in the conduct, interpretation or writing of this work. We acknowledge the contribution of the responders to the Delphi surveys, as well as administrative assistance provided by Kali Godbee and Donna Wakim at the SCRIBE consensus meeting. Lyndsey Nickels was funded by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT120100102) and Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders (CE110001021). For further discussion on this topic, please visit the Archives of Scientific Psychology online public forum at http://arcblog.apa.org. (Lifetime Care and Support Authority of New South Wales, Australia; FT120100102 - Australian Research Council Future Fellowship; CE110001021 - Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders)Published versio
    corecore