Contemporary issues in women’s health

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135468/1/ijgo3.pd

Contemporary issues in women’s health

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135535/1/ijgo187.pd

Improving medical students’ competence at breast examination

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135217/1/ijgo173.pd

Evaluation of a simulation‐based curriculum for implementing a new clinical protocol

ObjectiveTo evaluate the implementation of a new clinical protocol utilizing on‐unit simulation for team training.MethodsA prospective observational study was performed at the obstetrics unit of Von Voightlander Women’s Hospital, Michigan, USA, between October 1, 2012 to April 30, 2013. All members of the labor and delivery team were eligible for participation. Traditional education methods and in‐situ multi‐disciplinary simulations were used to educate labor and delivery staff. Following each simulation, participants responded to a survey regarding their experience. To evaluate the effect of the interventions, paging content was analyzed for mandated elements and adherence to operating room entry‐time tracking was examined.ResultsIn total, 51 unique individuals participated in 12 simulations during a 6‐month period. Simulation was perceived as a valuable activity and paging content improved. Following the intervention, the inclusion of a goal time for reaching the operation room increased from 7% to 61% of pages and the proportion of patients entering to operating room within 10 minutes of the stated goal increased from 67% to 85%.ConclusionThe training program was well received, and the accuracy of the communication and the goal set for reaching the operating room improved.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135397/1/ijgo333.pd

Current communication practices between obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants and program directors

Importance: In order to equitably improve the residency application process, it is essential to understand the problems we need to address. Objective: To determine how obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) applicants and faculty communicate applicants\u27 interest to residency programs, and how program directors report being influenced by these communications. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study was conducted with email surveys of OBGYN application stakeholders in 2022. Included participants were OBGYN applicants, clerkship directors, and residency program directors in medical education associations\u27 email listservs. Exposures: Surveys sent by the American Association of Medical Colleges, Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Main Outcomes and Measures: Whether applicants themselves, or faculty on their behalf, communicated to residency programs, and the influence program directors reported placing on these communications for their decision-making. Descriptive statistics and χ2 tests were used to analyze differences. Results: A total 726 of 2781 applicants (26.1%) responded to the survey and were included in analysis (79 of 249 [31.7%] clerkship directors; 200 of 280 [71.4%] program directors). The self-reported racial and ethnic demographics of the 726 applicant respondents were 86 Asian (11.8%), 54 Black (7.4%), 41 Latinx (5.6%), 1 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (0.1%), 369 White (52.2%), 45 with multiple racial identities (6.2%), and 91 (21.5%) preferring not to answer. The majority of applicants (590 [82.9%]) sent communications at some point in the application process. Applicants who identified as White (336 [88.7%]) or Asian (75 [87.2%]) were more likely than those who identified as Black (40 [74.1%]) or Latinx (33 [80.5%]) to reach out to programs (P = .02). There were also differences in type of medical school, with 377 of 427 MD applicants (88.3%), 109 of 125 DO applicants (87.2%), and 67 of 87 International Medical Graduate applicants (77.7%) reporting sending communications (P = .02). Approximately one-third (254 applicants [35.7%]) had faculty reach out to programs on their behalf. White (152 [40.1%]) and Asian (37 [43.0%]) applicants were more likely to have faculty reach out compared with Black (6 [11.1%]) and Latinx (12 [29.3%]) applicants (P = .01). Program directors reported that preinterview communications from faculty they knew (64 [32.2%]) and other program directors (25 [12.6%]) strongly influenced their decisions, and otherwise rarely reported that communications strongly influenced their decisions. Conclusions and Relevance: The current state of communications may increase inequities in residency application processes; differences between faculty communications for applicants from different racial and ethnic backgrounds are particularly concerning given that program directors are more likely to weigh communications from faculty in their decision-making. A centralized, equitable means for applicants to signal their interest to programs is urgently needed

Medical Student Experiences With Accessing and Entering Patient Information in Electronic Health Records During the Ob/Gyn Clerkship

Background Medical school graduates should be able to enter information from patient encounters and to write orders and prescriptions in the electronic health record. Studies have shown that, although students often can access electronic health records, some students may receive inadequate preparation for these skills. Greater understanding of student exposure to electronic health records during their obstetrics and gynecology clerkships can help to determine the extent to which students receive the educational experiences that may best prepare them for their future training and practice. Objective The purpose of this study was to examine medical student reporting of electronic health record use during the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Study Design A Step 2 Clinical Knowledge End-of-Examination Survey about electronic health record use was administered to medical students after they completed the Step 2 Clinical Knowledge component of the United States Medical Licensing Examination. For inpatient and outpatient rotations, students were asked if they accessed a record and if they entered notes or orders into it. Descriptive statistics for a sample of 16,366 medical students who graduated from Liaison Committee on Medical Education–accredited schools from 2012–2016 summarize student interactions with electronic health records by rotation type and graduation year. Chi-square techniques were used to examine mean differences in access and entry. Results The survey had an overall response rate of 70%. In 2016, most survey respondents (94%) accessed electronic health records during their obstetrics and gynecology clerkship, but 26% of them reported “read-only” access. On the inpatient service, <10% of students reported any order entry; 58% of them reported entering progress notes, and 47% of them reported entering an admitting history and physical. Conclusion Medical school graduates who are entering obstetrics and gynecology residencies are expected to be competent in documenting clinical encounters and entering orders, including those that are unique to obstetrics and gynecology. This study shows that some students may receive less experience with entering information into electronic health records during their obstetrics and gynecology clerkships than others, which could result in unequal levels of preparedness for graduate medical education

Student Evaluation of Faculty Physicians: Gender Differences in Teaching Evaluations

Purpose: To investigate whether there is a difference in medical student teaching evaluations for male and female clinical physician faculty. Methods: The authors examined all teaching evaluations completed by clinical students at one North American medical school in the surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, and internal medicine clinical rotations from 2008 to 2012. The authors focused on how students rated physician faculty on their ?overall quality of teaching? using a 5-point response scale (1?=?Poor to 5?=?Excellent). Linear mixed-effects models provided estimated mean differences in evaluation outcomes by faculty gender. Results: There were 14,107 teaching evaluations of 965 physician faculty. Of these evaluations, 7688 (54%) were for male physician faculty and 6419 (46%) were for female physician faculty. Female physicians received significantly lower mean evaluation scores in all four rotations. The discrepancy was largest in the surgery rotation (males?=?4.23, females?=?4.01, p?=?0.003). Pediatrics showed the next greatest difference (males?=?4.44, females?=?4.29, p?=?0.009), followed by obstetrics and gynecology (males?=?4.38, females?=?4.26, p?=?0.026), and internal medicine (males?=?4.35, females?=?4.27, p?=?0.043). Conclusions: Female physicians received lower teaching evaluations in all four core clinical rotations. This comprehensive examination adds to the medical literature by illuminating subtle differences in evaluations based on physician gender, and provides further evidence of disparities for women in academic medicine.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/140140/1/jwh.2015.5475.pd

Incidence of Resident Mistreatment in the Learning Environment Across Three Institutions

Introduction: Mistreatment in the learning environment is associated with negative outcomes for trainees. While the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) annual Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) has collected medical student reports of mistreatment for a decade, there is not a similar nationally benchmarked survey for residents. The objective of this study is to explore the prevalence of resident experiences with mistreatment. Methods: Residents at three academic institutions were surveyed using questions similar to the GQ in 2018. Quantitative data were analyzed based on frequency and Mann-Whitney U tests to detect gender differences. Results: Nine hundred ninety-six of 2682 residents (37.1%) responded to the survey. Thirty-nine percent of residents reported experiencing at least one incident of mistreatment. The highest reported incidents were public humiliation (23.7%) and subject to offensive sexist remarks/comments (16.0%). Female residents indicated experiencing significantly more incidents of: public embarrassment, public humiliation, offensive sexist remarks, lower evaluations based on gender, denied opportunities for training or rewards, and unwanted sexual advances. Faculty were the most frequent instigators of mistreatment (66.4%). Of trainees who reported experiencing mistreatment, less than one-quarter reported the behavior. Conclusion: Mistreatment in the academic learning environment is a concern in residency programs. There is increased frequency among female residents