8 research outputs found
Pure Anderson Motives over Finite Fields
In the arithmetic of function fields Drinfeld modules play the role that
elliptic curves take on in the arithmetic of number fields. As higher
dimensional generalizations of Drinfeld modules, and as the appropriate
analogues of abelian varieties, G. Anderson introduced pure t-motives. In this
article we study the arithmetic of the later. We investigate which pure
t-motives are semisimple, that is, isogenous to direct sums of simple ones. We
give examples for pure t-motives which are not semisimple. Over finite fields
the semisimplicity is equivalent to the semisimplicity of the endomorphism
algebra, but also this fails over infinite fields. Still over finite fields we
study the endomorphism rings of pure t-motives and criteria for the existence
of isogenies. We obtain answers which are similar to Tate's famous results for
abelian varieties.Comment: v2: final version to appear in Journal of Number Theory. Note, this
is the second part of the two-in-one article arXiv:math.NT/060973
Pure Anderson Motives and Abelian \tau-Sheaves
Pure t-motives were introduced by G. Anderson as higher dimensional
generalizations of Drinfeld modules, and as the appropriate analogs of abelian
varieties in the arithmetic of function fields. In order to construct moduli
spaces for pure t-motives the second author has previously introduced the
concept of abelian \tau-sheaf. In this article we clarify the relation between
pure t-motives and abelian \tau-sheaves. We obtain an equivalence of the
respective quasi-isogeny categories. Furthermore, we develop the elementary
theory of both structures regarding morphisms, isogenies, Tate modules, and
local shtukas. The later are the analogs of p-divisible groups.Comment: final version as it appears in Mathematische Zeitschrif