Early-Stage Breast Cancer Detection in Breast Milk

Breast cancer; Breast milkCáncer de mama; Leche maternaCàncer de mama; Llet maternaBreast cancer occurring during pregnancy (PrBC) and postpartum (PPBC) is usually diagnosed at more advanced stages compared with other breast cancer, worsening its prognosis. PPBC is particularly aggressive, with increased metastatic risk and mortality. Thus, effective screening methods to detect early PrBC and PPBC are needed. We report for the first time that cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) is present in breast milk (BM) collected from patients with breast cancer. Analysis of ctDNA from BM detects tumor variants in 87% of the cases by droplet digital PCR, while variants remain undetected in 92% of matched plasma samples. Retrospective next-generation sequencing analysis in BM ctDNA recapitulates tumor variants, with an overall clinical sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 100%. In two cases, ctDNA was detectable in BM collected 18 and 6 months prior to standard diagnosis. Our results open up the potential use of BM as a new source for liquid biopsy for PPBC detection. Significance: For the first time, we show that BM obtained from patients with breast cancer carries ctDNA, surpassing plasma-based liquid biopsy for detection and molecular profiling of early-stage breast cancer, even prior to diagnosis by image.We thank the patients who participated in the study and donated samples for analysis for their generous contribution, with particular thanks to the first patient, Maite, and her daughter Àneu, who inspired us to initiate this study (oral consent to name the patient and her daughter was provided by the patient, and her legal partner provided written consent after patient's exitus). We are grateful to Javier Carmona for his valuable contributions and support in the manuscript's conceptualization, preparation, and revision. VHIO would like to acknowledge the Cellex Foundation for providing research facilities and equipment and the CERCA Programme from the Generalitat de Catalunya for their support of this research. The authors from VHIO acknowledge the State Agency for Research (Agencia Estatal de Investigación) for the financial support as a Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa (CEX2020-001024-S/AEI/10.13039/501100011033). This research is financially supported by the “El paseíco de la mama” Foundation. C. Saura was the recipient of a II FERO-GHD grant from the FERO Foundation (FERO/5086), a Junior Clinical award from the Spanish Association Against Cancer Foundation (FAECC; CLJUN212026ORTI), and a SEOM-Daiichi Sankyo grant for its support on the Breast Cancer Research Projects 2021 (SEOM/FECMA2022) and received funding from the Department of Health (Generalitat de Catalunya SLT008/18/00198) and from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), cofunded by the European Union (PI21/01020). C. Ortiz was the recipient of a Junior Clinician award from the FAECC (CLJUN212026ORTI) and a SEOM-Daiichi Sankyo grant for its support on the Breast Cancer Research Projects 2021 (SEOM/FECMA2022), and received funding from the Department of Health (Generalitat de Catalunya SLT008/18/00198). N. Bayó-Puxan received funding from the Department of Health (Generalitat de Catalunya SLT008/18/00205), MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (GPE2022-001029) and MCIN/AEI/10.130.39/501100011033, and the European Union “Next GenerationEU/PRTR” (ECT2020-000827). J.M. Miquel received funding from the Department of Health (Generalitat de Catalunya SLT008/18/00205), MCIN/AEI/10.130.39/501100011033, and the European Union “Next GenerationEU/PRTR” (ECT2020-000827). J. Arribas is funded by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF-23-008), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (project reference numbers AC15/00062, CB16/12/00449, and PI22/00001), and the European Commission under the framework of the ERA-NET TRANSCAN-2 initiative cofinanced by FEDER and Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer. A. Vivancos was the recipient of a project award from the FAECC (AVP/18/AECC/3219) and received funding from the Advanced Molecular Diagnostic (DIAMAV) program from the FERO Foundation (8361) and from ISDIN for supporting the development of liquid biopsy applications at the Cancer Genomics Lab (1848). M. Sansó was the recipient of a II FERO-GHD grant from the FERO Foundation (FERO/5086) and an investigator award from the FAECC (INVES19056SANS), and received funding from the Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), the RADIX-Janssen program (RADIX/JANSSEN21/01), and the Miguel Servet Program funded by the ISCIII (CP22/00131)

Biomarker Analysis of the Phase III NALA Study of Neratinib + Capecitabine versus Lapatinib + Capecitabine in Patients with Previously Treated Metastatic Breast CancerBiomarker Analysis of the Phase III NALA Study in HER2+ MBC

PurposeNeratinib plus capecitabine (N+C) demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in NALA (NCT01808573), a randomized phase III trial comparing N+C with lapatinib + capecitabine (L+C) in 621 patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had received ≥2 prior HER2-directed regimens in the metastatic setting. We evaluated correlations between exploratory biomarkers and PFS.Patients and methodsSomatic mutations were evaluated by next-generation sequencing on primary or metastatic samples. HER2 protein expression was evaluated by central IHC, H-score, and VeraTag/HERmark. p95 expression (truncated HER2) was measured by VeraTag. HRs were estimated using unstratified Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsFour hundred and twenty samples had successful sequencing: 34.0% had PIK3CA mutations and 5.5% had HER2 (ERBB2) mutations. In the combined patient populations, PIK3CA mutations trended toward shorter PFS [wild-type vs. mutant, HR = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.64-1.03], whereas HER2 mutations trended toward longer PFS [HR = 1.69 (95% CI, 0.97-3.29)]. Higher HER2 protein expression was associated with longer PFS [IHC 3+ vs. 2+, HR = 0.67 (0.54-0.82); H-score ≥240 versus <240, HR = 0.77 (0.63-0.93); HERmark positive vs. negative, HR = 0.76 (0.59-0.98)]. Patients whose tumors had higher HER2 protein expression (any method) derived an increased benefit from N+C compared with L+C [IHC 3+, HR = 0.64 (0.51-0.81); H-score ≥ 240, HR = 0.54 (0.41-0.72); HERmark positive, HR = 0.65 (0.50-0.84)], as did patients with high p95 [p95 ≥2.8 relative fluorescence (RF)/mm2, HR = 0.66 (0.50-0.86) vs. p95 < 2.8 RF/mm2, HR = 0.91 (0.61-1.36)].ConclusionsPIK3CA mutations were associated with shorter PFS whereas higher HER2 expression was associated with longer PFS. Higher HER2 protein expression was also associated with a greater benefit for N+C compared with L+C

Table S3 from Early-Stage Breast Cancer Detection in Breast Milk

Complete information of the Case cohort, with clinical features and results from the somatic mutation analysis</p

Table S5 from Early-Stage Breast Cancer Detection in Breast Milk

VHIO-YWBC NGS panel gene list</p

Figure S3 from Early-Stage Breast Cancer Detection in Breast Milk

Diagnostic images of the PPBC from case #15 right breast</p

Supplementary Excel Tables from Early-Stage Breast Cancer Detection in Breast Milk

Table 1. Samples analyzed by NGS Table 2. VHIO-300 results from solid tumor Table 3. VHIO-YWBC results from BM positive for ctDNA</p

Figure S2 from Early-Stage Breast Cancer Detection in Breast Milk

Analytical validation of the VHIO-YWBC protocol for NGS</p

Table S4 from Early-Stage Breast Cancer Detection in Breast Milk

List of BM samples</p

Table S1 from Early-Stage Breast Cancer Detection in Breast Milk

VHIO-300 NGS panel gene list</p

Table S7 from Early-Stage Breast Cancer Detection in Breast Milk

Sensitivity of the BM ctDNA detection assays.</p