21 research outputs found
Simulating photonic devices with noisy optical elements
Quantum computers are inherently affected by noise. While in the long-term
error correction codes will account for noise at the cost of increasing
physical qubits, in the near-term the performance of any quantum algorithm
should be tested and simulated in the presence of noise. As noise acts on the
hardware, the classical simulation of a quantum algorithm should not be
agnostic on the platform used for the computation. In this work, we apply the
recently proposed noisy gates approach to efficiently simulate noisy optical
circuits described in the dual rail framework. The evolution of the state
vector is simulated directly, without requiring the mapping to the density
matrix framework. Notably, we test the method on both the gate-based and
measurement-based quantum computing models, showing that the approach is very
versatile. We also evaluate the performance of a photonic variational quantum
algorithm to solve the MAX-2-CUT problem. In particular we design and simulate
an ansatz which is resilient to photon losses up to making it
relevant for near term applications
Phase Noise in Real-World Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution
We investigate the impact of noise sources in real-world implementations of
Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution (TF-QKD) protocols, focusing on phase noise
from photon sources and connecting fibers. Our work emphasizes the role of
laser quality, network topology, fiber length, arm balance, and detector
performance in determining key rates. Remarkably, it reveals that the leading
TF-QKD protocols are similarly affected by phase noise despite different
mechanisms. Our study demonstrates duty cycle improvements of over 2x through
narrow-linewidth lasers and phase-control techniques, highlighting the
potential synergy with high-precision time/frequency distribution services.
Ultrastable lasers, evolving toward integration and miniaturization, offer
promise for agile TF-QKD implementations on existing networks. Properly
addressing phase noise and practical constraints allows for consistent key rate
predictions, protocol selection, and layout design, crucial for establishing
secure long-haul links for the Quantum Communication Infrastructures under
development in several countries.Comment: 18 pages, 8 figures, 2 table
Corrugated Waveguide Slow-Wave Structure for THz Travelling Wave Tube
THz applications require sources and amplifiers compact, lightweight and powerful. Vacuum electron devices are the candidate solution. Among others, the Corrugated Waveguide Slow-Wave Structure seems particularly suitable for Traveling Wave Tubes in the THz region. THz vacuum electron devices require high precision technological processes with high aspect ratio such as SU-8 process. However, fabrication tolerances could highly affect the overall performances. Therefore a statistical analysis is fundamental for a reliable design. In this summary it is proposed a method based on an analytical model of the corrugated waveguide together with the Pierce theory, to fastly compute the gain of corrugated waveguide vacuum traveling wave tubes. The method is validated by three-dimensional electromagnetic softwares, both for cold and hot parameters. The proved accuracy and fast computation time make the model suitable for performing the sensitivity analysis of the Corrugated waveguide Vacuum tube to be realized by SU-8 technology process
Packaged Single Pole Double Thru (SPDT) and True Time Delay Lines (TTDL) Based on RF MEMS Switches
Packaged MEMS devices for RF applications have been modelled, realized and tested. In particular, RF MEMS single ohmic series switches (SPST) have been obtained on silicon high resistivity substrates and they have been integrated in alumina packages to get single-pole-double-thru (SPDT) and true-time-delayline (TTDL) configurations. As a result, TTDLs for wide band operation, designed for the (6-18) GHz band, have been obtained, with predicted insertion losses less than 2 dB up to 14 GHz for the short path and 3 dB for the long path, and delay times in the order of 0.3-0.4 ns for the short path and 0.5-0.6 ns for the long path. The maximum differential delay time is in the order of 0.2 ns