MK-0448, a Specific Kv1.5 Inhibitor: Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamic Electrophysiology in Experimental Animal Models and in Humans.

BACKGROUND: -We evaluated the viability of I(Kur) as a target for maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation through the testing of MK-0448, a novel I(Kur) inhibitor. METHODS AND RESULTS: -In vitro MK-0448 studies demonstrated strong inhibition of I(Kur) with minimal off-target activity. In vivo MK-0448 studies in normal anesthetized dogs demonstrated significant prolongation of the atrial refractory period compared with vehicle controls without affecting the ventricular refractory period. In studies of a conscious dog heart failure model, sustained AF was terminated with bolus intravenous MK-0448 doses of 0.03 and 0.1 mg/kg. These data led to a two-part first-in-human study: Part I evaluated safety and pharmacokinetics, and Part II was an invasive electrophysiologic (EP) study in healthy subjects. MK-0448 was well-tolerated with mild adverse experiences, most commonly irritation at the injection site. During the EP study, ascending doses of MK-0448 were administered, but no increases in atrial or ventricular refractoriness were detected despite achieving plasma concentrations in excess of 2 μM. Follow-up studies in normal anesthetized dogs designed to assess the influence of autonomic tone demonstrated that prolongation of atrial refractoriness with MK-0448 was markedly attenuated in the presence of vagal nerve simulation, suggesting that the effects of I(Kur) blockade on atrial repolarization may be negated by enhanced parasympathetic neural tone. CONCLUSIONS: -The contribution of I(Kur) to human atrial electrophysiology is less prominent than in preclinical models and therefore is likely to be of limited therapeutic value for the prevention of atrial fibrillation

Discovery of Naphthyl-Fused 5‑Membered Lactams as a New Class of M₁ Positive Allosteric Modulators

Selective activation of the M₁ muscarinic receptor via positive allosteric modulation represents an original approach to treat the cognitive decline in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. A series of naphthyl-fused 5-membered lactams were identified as a new class of M₁ positive allosteric modulators and were found to possess good potency and in vivo efficacy

Identification of Amides as Carboxylic Acid Surrogates for Quinolizidinone-Based M₁ Positive Allosteric Modulators

Selective activation of the M₁ muscarinic receptor via positive allosteric modulation represents an approach to treat the cognitive decline in patients with Alzheimer's disease. A series of amides were examined as a replacement for the carboxylic acid moiety in a class of quinolizidinone carboxylic acid M₁ muscarinic receptor positive allosteric modulators, and leading pyran <b>4o</b> and cyclohexane <b>5c</b> were found to possess good potency and in vivo efficacy

MK-7622: A First-in-Class M₁ Positive Allosteric Modulator Development Candidate

Identification of ligands that selectively activate the M₁ muscarinic signaling pathway has been sought for decades to treat a range of neurological and cognitive disorders. Herein, we describe the optimization efforts focused on addressing key physicochemical and safety properties, ultimately leading to the clinical candidate MK-7622, a highly selective positive allosteric modulator of the M₁ muscarinic receptor that has entered Phase II studies in patients with Alzheimer’s disease

Toward in silico CMC: An industrial collaborative approach to model‐based process development

The Third Modeling Workshop focusing on bioprocess modeling was held in Kenilworth, NJ in May 2019. A summary of these Workshop proceedings is captured in this manuscript. Modeling is an active area of research within the biotechnology community, and there is a critical need to assess the current state and opportunities for continued investment to realize the full potential of models, including resource and time savings. Beyond individual presentations and topics of novel interest, a substantial portion of the Workshop was devoted toward group discussions of current states and future directions in modeling fields. All scales of modeling, from biophysical models at the molecular level and up through large scale facility and plant modeling, were considered in these discussions and are summarized in the manuscript. Model life cycle management from model development to implementation and sustainment are also considered for different stages of clinical development and commercial production. The manuscript provides a comprehensive overview of bioprocess modeling while suggesting an ideal future state with standardized approaches aligned across the industry