The big fish strikes again but in a different place: Social comparison theory and children with special needs

This paper will address the implications of Big-Fish Little Pond Effect (BFLPE) and social comparison theory and school placement of students with special needs. It made use of the PISA data base to determine if type of educational placement had an impact on the academic self-concept with children with special needs. Multiple regression techniques were used to delineate the relationships

Self-concept and academic motivation of Chinese students in Hong Kong

We examined the frame-of-reference effects of potentially important self-constructs (e.g., self-concepts, values, goals) among Grade 7 Hong Kong Chinese students (N=1950). Specifically, the study analysed how the immediate context of schoolmates’ ability affected students’ perceptions of their own ability. It was postulated that students formulated their self-concept by comparing their own performance (e.g., math achievement) with that of other students (i.e., the external frame) as well as their own performance in other academic areas (e.g., language; the internal frame). This would have negative effects on the self-concept of students studying in schools with high average student ability (big-fish-little-pond effects, BFLPE). In this study, we explored how other individual difference attributes moderate the frame-of-reference effects on self-concept. Results showed that in general stronger mastery goal, persistence strategies, and utility (value) helped to reduce the negative BFLPE, while stronger avoidance goal, and ability attribution (for Mathematics) further increased this negative BFLPE.published_or_final_versio

The big-fish-little-pond effect under the grill : tests of its universality, a search for moderators, and the role of social comparison

High-ability students will provide future leadership in many fields of endeavour. However, the current practice of educating high-ability students in academically selective classes and schools may not provide the optimum environments for all such students. Big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE) research has demonstrated that students in high-ability environments have lower academic self-concepts than equally able students in low-ability settings. Low academic self-concepts are associated with negative educational outcomes. The present investigation aimed to extend current BFLPE theory and research by: (a) testing the BFLPE’s external validity across 41 countries to ascertain the theory’s universality; (b) testing whether the BFLPE is evident in developing countries and in collectivist countries to ascertain whether it transcends cultural and economic barriers; (c) investigating constructs that have the potential to moderate the adverse effects of the BFLPE; (d) elucidating whether upward social comparisons moderate or co-exist with the BFLPE to resolve a conflict in the literature; (e) critically analysing the relation between social comparison processes and the BFLPE to further inform theory; and (f) testing whether the BFLPE varies as a function of ability to clarify its impact on different ability levels. Three studies were conducted to achieve these aims. Study 1 assessed the BFLPE’s external validity and investigated potential BFLPE moderators. Participants were 265,180 15-year-old students who took part in the 2003 Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2005a, 2005b). The BFLPE was evident in the entire cross-national sample of 41 culturally and economically diverse countries, and individually in 38. Moderating effects emerged for socio-economic status (SES), individual differences in learning, and individual perceptions of the learning environment. However, in relation to the large sample these effects were considered small. A larger moderating effect emerged for anxiety, where the BFLPE was found to be greater for highly anxious students. Study 2 was designed to resolve an apparent contradiction between the social comparison and the BFLPE literatures. Previously published social comparison data (Blanton, Buunk, Gibbons, and Kuyper, 1999; Huguet, Dumas, Monteil, and Genestoux, 2001) were further analysed to ascertain whether the BFLPE was moderated by, or co-existed with, with the beneficial effects of upward comparisons on performance. Participants were 876 Dutch and 1,156 French students. The BFLPE was moderated for Dutch language, but for all other academic subjects it co-existed with selected upward comparisons. Study 3 assessed the effect of selected comparisons on the BFLPE. Participants were 2,015 French students. The BFLPE was found to co-exist with selected comparisons measured subjectively and when measured objectively for math. The BFLPE was moderated by comparison choice in French when measured objectively and by a performance avoidance goal orientation. The moderating effect of individual ability was tested in all three studies, but provided only small effects, inconsistent in direction. These results define the BFLPE as externally valid and universally applicable and suggest that it is not moderated by selected social comparisons. Results regarding BFLPE moderators offer practical information to inform intervention strategies that may assist high-ability students to reach their full academic potential

From frogs to fish: "The Big-Fish-Little-Pond" effect then and now

This paper traces the development of "the big-fish-little-pond" effect (BFLPE), which asserts that students in high-ability classes and schools have lower academic self-concepts than their equally able counterparts in low- and mixed-ability environments. The paper begins with a description of the problem outlined in the BFLPE model and continues by examining early BFLPE research and by tracing advances in the field. Criticisms of the BFLPE are outlined and research is described that addresses these criticisms. The paper concludes by presenting suggestions for future BFLPE studies

Big fish in a big pond: a study of academic self concept in first year medical students

Background: Big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE) research has demonstrated that students in high-ability environments have lower academic self-concepts than equally able students in low-ability settings. Research has shown low academic self-concepts to be associated with negative educational outcomes. Social comparison processes have been implicated as fundamental to the BFLPE. Methods: Twenty first-year students in an Australian medical school completed a survey that included academic self-concept and social comparison measures, before and after their first written assessments. Focus groups were also conducted with a separate group of students to explore students’ perceptions of competence, the medical school environment, and social comparison processes. Results: The quantitative study did not reveal any changes in academic self-concept or self-evaluation. The qualitative study suggested that the attributions that students used when discussing performance were those that have been demonstrated to negatively affect self-concept. Students reported that the environment was slightly competitive and they used social comparison to evaluate their performance. Conclusions: Although the BFLPE was not evident in the quantitative study, results from the qualitative study suggest that the BFLPE might be operating In that students were using attributions that are associated with lower self-concepts, the environment was slightly competitive, and social comparisons were used for evaluation

Attitude to non-violence scale: validity and practical use

This study used recent advances in attitude and self-perception research to develop an Attitude to Non-Violence Scale (ANVS). Participants were students from six high schools in Australia (N = 727). Confirmatory factor analysis using within-construct and between-construct validation approaches found two positive attitude sub-scales: Cognitive (proactive understanding) and Affective (do not endorse violence), both showing convergent and discriminant validity. Scale equivalence tests found that the sub-scales were applicable to boys and girls and to junior and senior grades. Structural equation modeling found that boys had less supportive attitudes to nonviolence cognitively, whereas female students in senior secondary classes had less positive attitudes to non-violence affectively. The ANVS can be easily administered to assess youth’s non-violence attitudes, which may direct interventions focusing on boys’ cognitive aspects while maintaining girls’ positive affective attitudes toward non-violence as they mature. The positively framed instrument is suitable for education settings especially in high-risk locations where violence is prevalent