Considerations about the influence of upper arms positioning on myocardial perfusion scintigraphy results

I NTRODUÇÃO: Na cintilografia de perfusão do miocárdio, contrariamente ao desenvolvimento tecnológico ao longo do tempo, manteve-se desde o princípio a mesma forma, por vezes desconfortável ou mesmo inviável, de posicionamento na aquisição das imagens: decúbito dorsal com os braços elevados. OBJETIVOS: O objetivo da pesquisa foi o de avaliar se na aquisição da cintilografia de perfusão do miocárdio o posicionamento com os membros superiores abaixados(T) apresenta os mesmos resultados que os obtidos com os membros superiores elevados(C), tanto em termos de alterações perfusionais como em relação aos parâmetros funcionais. . MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 120 pacientes, 83 (69%) do sexo masculino, com idade 59,4 ± 11,4 anos e peso 72,8 ± 14 kg. Foi realizada primeiramente a aquisição C e na seqüência a aquisição T, utilizando protocolo de um dia de repouso-estresse (dose 370 MBq e 1110 MBq de sestamibi-99mTc), com estresse sincronizado ao eletrocardiograma (gated- SPECT). Três modelos distintos de equipamentos de dois detectores foram utilizados no estudo. Os estudos foram processados usando reconstrução iterativa (OSEM). Na interpretação foi utilizado o modelo de segmentação miocárdica de 17 segmentos, pontuados de 0 a 4 (normal a ausente) segundo o grau de captação. Baseada na análise de um observador dentre um grupo de sete, foi realizada a comparação da totalidade dos segmentos e também segmento a segmento das aquisições C e T nas etapas de estresse e de repouso. Foi comparada também a somatória das pontuações das etapas de estresse(SSS) e repouso(SRS). Os pacientes foram divididos segundo dois critérios: primeiramente, normais (SSS=0) e anormais (SSS>1) e posteriormente, em de baixo risco (SSS3) e de maior risco (SSS>3) A comparação dos parâmetros funcionais de fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE), volume diastólico final (VDF), volume sistólico final(VSF), somatória dos escores de motilidade (SMS) e somatória dos escores de espessamento (STS) foi baseada nos valores obtidos de modo automático utilizando o programa computacional Quantitative Gated SPECT. RESULTADOS: No modo C, 23,3% dos pts referiram algum grau de dor no membro superior ou no ombro e no modo T 5 %. Houve diferença significativa (p3). The values of the functional parameters of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end diastolic volume (EDV), end systolic volume (ESV), stress motion score (SMS) and stress thickening score (STS) for both C and T were automatically obtained by the quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) program and results were compared. Shoulder and/or back pain occurred in 23.3% of C patients and in 5% of T patients. There was no agreement between the 2040 segmental scores of both rest and stress in C and T modes (p<0.05). No significant differences between C and T were found for SSS and SRS in the 63 normal individuals nor in the 80 low risk patients. Good correlation between C and T was found for SSS (Rho=0.95, p=0.0001) and SRS (Rho=0.96 p=0.0001) in the 57 abnormal pts, but the mean SSS (9.28±8.10) and SRS (7.89±7.34) values of T were significantly lower (p<0.05) than the mean for SSS (10.07±7,71) and SRS(8.46±7,35) of C mode. Similar patterns were observed in the 40 risk pts; good correlation was found between C and T modes for SSS (Rho=0.95, p=0.0001) and SRS (Rho=0.96 p=0.0001), but the mean SSS (12.53±7.54) and SRS (10.60±7.08) values of T were significantly lower (p<0.05) than SSS (13.43±6.81) and SRS (11.33±6.97) of C mode. Good correlation between C and T was found for all functional parameters, except for EDV (p=0.0001). Although T mode appears to be more comfortable and presented a good correlation between SSS and SRS values, in abnormal and risk pts, the extent and severity of defects can be underestimated. Considering the important therapeutic and prognostic implications of an accurate perfusion measurement, the cardiac SPECT acquisition with the arms in down position should be avoided. When arms-down acquisition is the only alternative, scintigraphy results must be carefully interpreted, especially in abnormal scans whereas the amount of perfusion abnormalities can be underestimated

Myocardial blood flow assessment with 82rubidium-PET imaging in patients with left bundle branch block

OBJECTIVES: Perfusion abnormalities are frequently seen in Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) when a left bundle branch block is present. A few studies have shown decreased coronary flow reserve in the left anterior descending territory, regardless of the presence of coronary artery disease. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate rubidium-82 (82Rb) positron emission tomography imaging in the assessment of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve in patients with left bundle branch block. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with left bundle branch block (GI), median age 63.5 years, 22 (58%) female, 12 with coronary artery disease (≥70%; GI-A) and 26 with no evidence of significant coronary artery disease (GI-B), underwent rest-dipyridamole stress 82Rb-positron emission tomography with absolute quantitative flow measurements using Cedars-Sinai software (mL/min/g). The relative myocardial perfusion and left ventricular ejection fraction were assessed in 17 segments. These parameters were compared with those obtained from 30 patients with normal 82Rb-positron emission tomography studies and without left bundle branch block (GII). RESULTS: Stress myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve were significantly lower in GI than in GII (

Left ventricular function in response to dipyridamole stress: head-to-head comparison between (82)Rubidium PET and Tc-99m-sestamibi SPECT ECG-gated myocardial perfusion imaging

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with Tc-99m-sestamibi (sestamibi) SPECT and rubidium-82 (Rb-82) PET both allow for combined assessment of perfusion and left ventricular (LV) function. We sought to compare parameters of LV function obtained with both methods using a single dipyridamole stress dose. A group of 221 consecutive patients (65.2 +/- 10.4 years, 52.9% male) underwent consecutive sestamibi and Rb-82 MPI after a single dipyridamole stress dose. Sestamibi and Rb-82 summed rest (SRS), stress (SSS) and difference (SDS) scores, and LV end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were compared. Bland-Altman analysis showed that with increasing ESV and EDV the difference between the two perfusion tracers increased both at rest and post-stress. The mean difference in EDV and ESV between the two perfusion tracers at rest could both be independently explained by the Rb-82 SDS and the sestamibi SRS. The combined models explained approximately 30% of the variation in these volumes between the two perfusion tracers (R-2 = 0.261, p = 0.005; R-2 = 0.296, p <0.001, for EDV and ESV respectively). However, the mean difference in LVEF between sestamibi and Rb-82 showed no significant trend post-stress (R-2 = 0.001, p = 0.70) and only a modest linear increase with increasing LVEF values at rest (R-2 = 0.032, p = 0.009). Differences in left ventricular volumes between sestamibi and Rb-82 MPI increase with increasing volumes. However, these differences did only marginally affect LVEF between sestamibi and Rb-82. In clinical practice these results should be taken into account when comparing functional derived parameters between sestamibi and Rb-82 MP

(18)F-FDG PET After 2 Cycles of ABVD Predicts Event-Free Survival in Early and Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma

Our objective was to assess the prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET after 2 cycles of chemotherapy using doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients overall and in subgroups of patients with early and advanced stages and with low and high risks according to the International Prognostic Score (IPS). Methods: One hundred fifteen patients with newly diagnosed HL were prospectively included in the study. All underwent standard ABVD therapy followed by consolidation radiotherapy in cases of bulky disease. After 2 cycles of ABVD, the patients were evaluated with PET (PET2). Prognostic analysis compared the 3-y event-free survival (EFS) rate to the PET2 results, clinical data, and IPS. Results: Of the 104 evaluated patients, 93 achieved complete remission after first-line therapy. During a median follow-up of 36 mo, relapse or disease progression was seen in 22 patients. Treatment failure was seen in 16 of the 30 PET2-positive patients and in only 6 of the 74 PET2-negative patients. PET2 was the only significant prognostic factor. The 3-y EFS was 53.4% for PET2-positive patients and 90.5% for PET2-negative ones (P < 0.001). When patients were categorized according to low or high IPS risk and according to early or advanced stage of disease, PET2 was also significantly associated with treatment outcome. Conclusion: PET2 is an accurate and independent predictor of EFS in HL. A negative interim (18)F-FDG PET result is highly predictive of treatment success in overall HL patients, as well as in subgroups with early or advanced-stage disease and with low or high IPS risk

Myocardial blood flow assessment with 82rubidium-PET imaging in patients with left bundle branch block

OBJECTIVES: Perfusion abnormalities are frequently seen in Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) when a left bundle branch block is present. A few studies have shown decreased coronary flow reserve in the left anterior descending territory, regardless of the presence of coronary artery disease. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate rubidium-82 (82Rb) positron emission tomography imaging in the assessment of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve in patients with left bundle branch block. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with left bundle branch block (GI), median age 63.5 years, 22 (58%) female, 12 with coronary artery disease (≥70%; GI-A) and 26 with no evidence of significant coronary artery disease (GI-B), underwent rest-dipyridamole stress 82Rb-positron emission tomography with absolute quantitative flow measurements using Cedars-Sinai software (mL/min/g). The relative myocardial perfusion and left ventricular ejection fraction were assessed in 17 segments. These parameters were compared with those obtained from 30 patients with normal 82Rb-positron emission tomography studies and without left bundle branch block (GII). RESULTS: Stress myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve were significantly lower in GI than in GII (p<0.05). The comparison of coronary flow reserve between GI-A and GI-B showed that it was different from the global coronary flow reserve (p<0.05) and the stress flow was significantly lower in the anterior than in the septal wall for both groups. Perfusion abnormalities were more prevalent in GI-A (p=0.06) and the left ventricular ejection fraction was not different between GI-A and GI-B, whereas it was lower in GI than in GII (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The data confirm that patients with left bundle branch block had decreased myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve and coronary flow reserve assessed by 82Rb-positron emission tomography imaging may be useful in identifying coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block

Sincronia ventricular em portadores de miocardiopatia dilatada e indivíduos normais: avaliação através da ventriculografia radioisotópica Ventricular synchrony in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and normal individuals: assessment by radionuclide ventriculography

OBJETIVO: Estabelecer parâmetros de sincronia intra- e interventricular em indivíduos normais e compará-los aos de pacientes com miocardiopatia dilatada com e sem distúrbios de condução ao eletrocardiograma (ECG). MÉTODOS: Três grupos de pacientes foram incluídos no estudo: 18 indivíduos (G1) sem cardiopatia e com ECG normal (52+/-12 anos, 29% masculinos); 50 portadores de miocardiopatia dilatada e disfunção ventricular esquerda grave, sendo 20 pacientes (G2) com QRS < 120 ms (51+/-10 anos, 75% masculinos) e 30 pacientes (G3) com QRS > 120 ms (57+/-12 anos, 60% masculinos). Todos foram submetidos à ventriculografia radioisotópica (VR). Para avaliar dissincronia intraventricular esquerda foi estudada a largura do histograma de fase e para avaliar dissincronia interventricular foi medida a diferença da média do ângulo de fase entre o ventrículo direito e o esquerdo (DifDE). RESULTADOS: As frações de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE)s foram: 62±6% (G1), 27±6% (G2) e 22±7% (G3) e do VD foram: 46 ± 4% (G1), 38±9%(G2) e 37±9% (G3). A avaliação da largura do histograma de fase foi de: 89±18 ms (G1), 203±54 ms (G2) e 312±130 ms (G3), p<0,0001. A medida da difVDVE foi de: 14±11 ms (G1), 39±40 ms (G2) e 87±49 ms (G3); quando se compararam G1 x G2 e G1 x G3, p<0,0001 e G2 x G3, p=0,0007. CONCLUSÃO: Os parâmetros analisados discriminam os três grupos de pacientes de acordo com o grau de sincronia ventricular. Pacientes com miocardiopatia dilatada e sem bloqueio de ramo ao ECG (QRS < 120 ms) podem apresentar dissincronia, porém em menor grau que os pacientes com QRS alargado.<br>OBJECTIVE: To establish the parameters of intra- and interventricular synchrony in normal individuals and to compare them with patients with dilated cardiomyopathy with and without conduction disorders shown in the electrocardiogram (ECG) examination. METHODS: Three groups of patients were included in this study: 18 individuals (G1) with no cardiomyopathy and with a normal ECG (52±12 years, 29% male); 50 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and severe left ventricular dysfunction, with 20 patients (G2) presenting QRS <120ms (51±10 years, 75% male) and 30 patients (G3) with QRS >120ms (57±12 years, 60% male). All patients underwent RV. Evaluation of left intraventricular dyssynchrony was carried out with the measurement of the phase histogram width and interventricular dyssynchrony was evaluated by the difference of the mean phase angle between the right and left ventricles (RLDif). RESULTS: Left ventricle ejection fractions (LVEF)s were: 62 ± 6% (G1), 27 ± 7% (G2) and 22 ± 8% (G3) and right ventricle ejection fractions were: 46 ± 5% (G1), 41 ± 6%(G2) and 38 ± 8% (G3). Evaluation of the phase histogram width was: 89 ± 18 ms (G1), 203 ± 54 ms (G2) and 312 ± 130 ms (G3), p<0.0001. The measurement of RLDif was: 14 ± 11 ms (G1), 39 ± 40 ms (G2) and 87 ± 49 ms (G3); comparing G1 vs. G2 and G1 vs. G3, p<0.0001 and G2 vs. G3, p=0.0007. CONCLUSION: The parameters analyzed discriminate the three groups of patients according to the ventricular synchrony degree. Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and withno branch block in ECG (QRS <120 ms) may present dyssynchrony, but at a lower degree than patients with widened QRS