On line clinical reasoning assessment with Script Concordance test in urology: results of a French pilot study

BACKGROUND: The Script Concordance test (SC) test is an assessment tool that measures the capacity to solve ill-defined problems, that is, reasoning in a context of uncertainty. This study assesses the feasibility, reliability and validity of the SC test made available on the Web to French urologists. METHODS: A 97 items SC test was developed based on major educational objectives of French urology training programmes. A secure Web site was created with two sequential modules: a) The first one for the reference panel to elaborate the scoring system; b) The second for candidates with different levels of experience in urology: Board certified urologists, chief-residents, residents, medical students. All participants were recruited on a voluntary basis. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics of the participants' scores and factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) to study differences between groups' means. Reliability was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient. RESULTS: The on line SC test has been operational since June 2004. Twenty-six faculty members constituted the reference panel. During the following 10 months, 207 participants took the test online (124 urologists, 29 chief-residents, 38 residents, 16 students). No technical problem was encountered. Forty-five percent of the participants completed the test partially only. Differences between the means scores for the 4 groups were statistically significant (P = 0.0123). The Bonferroni post-hoc correction indicated that significant differences were present between students and chief-residents, between students and urologists. There were no differences between chief-residents and urologists. Reliability coefficient was 0.734 for the total group of participants. CONCLUSION: Feasibility of Web-based SC test was proved successful by the large number of participants who participated in a few months. This Web site has permitted to quickly confirm reliability of the SC test and develop strategy to improve construct validity of the test when applied in the field of urology. Nevertheless, optimisation of the SC test content, with a smaller number of items will be necessary. Virtual medical education initiative such as this SC test delivered on the Internet warrants consideration in the current context of national pre-residency certification examination in France

Double stenting of oesophagus and airways in palliative treatment of patients with oesophageal cancer is efficient but associated with a high morbidity.

International audienceBACKGROUND: Double stenting of oesophagus and airways may be required in palliative treatment of patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer. AIM: To assess feasibility, efficacy and complications occurring in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer receiving both oesophagus and airways stenting. METHODS: In one single centre between 1997 and 2005, among 180 patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer treated by the palliative placement of a self-expanding metal stent, patients requiring double stenting of oesophagus and airways were identified. Clinical efficacy, complications and survival were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (8.3% of 180) required a double stenting at follow-up. Symptomatic efficacy of oesophagus and airways stenting was 86.7% for dysphagia and 100% for dyspnoea. Median survival after the second stent insertion was 99 days. Life-threatening early complications occurred in three patients after double stenting (20%), including two deaths following oesophageal perforation and massive haemoptysis, respectively. Procedure-related mortality was 13.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Double stenting of oesophagus and airways is feasible in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer, with a relevant clinical efficacy. However, early major complications including procedure-related death may occur in as many as 20% of patients. This treatment should be reserved to very selected patients with severe symptoms and end-stage disease

A Comparison of Two Regimens of Topical Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Patients with Bullous Pemphigoid: A Multicenter Randomized Study

Superpotent topical corticosteroids (CS) have been demonstrated to improve bullous pemphigoid (BP) patients’ survival. We assessed whether a mild regimen using lower doses of topical CS and a shorter duration could improve the outcome of BP patients even more. Three-hundred and twelve BP patients were included in a multicenter randomized controlled trial and stratified depending on the extent of BP as moderate (n=134) or extensive (n=178). Patients were randomly assigned to the standard regimen (clobetasol propionate cream, 40g per day initially, with CS tapering over 12 months) or the mild regimen (10–30g per day), with CS tapering over 4 months. A noninferior rate of BP control was obtained with the mild regimen 156/159 (98%) as compared with the standard regimen 150/150 (100%; P=0.005). Event-free survival, that is, the combined outcome of deaths and life-threatening adverse events did not differ between the two treatment groups (P=0.77). However, upon adjusting through the Cox model for age and Karnofsky score, a strong beneficial effect of the mild regimen was observed in patients with moderate BP, with an almost twofold decrease in the risk of death or life-threatening adverse events relative to the standard regimen (hazard ratio=0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.30–0.97; P=0.039). This mild regimen allows a 70% reduction of the cumulative doses of CS and improves BP patients’ outcome