6 research outputs found

    Laparoscopic management of a newborn with a right Amyand's hernia and a left incarcerated inguinal hernia

    Get PDF
    A one month old boy presented with left incarcerated inguinal hernia. After unsuccessful manual reduction, we decided to perform laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Laparoscopic examination showed a left hernia with intestinal loops that entered into the internal inguinal ring, on the right side there was an unknown patency of the peritoneal vaginal duct with the appendix completely incarcerated within the sac. On the left side, the loops were reduced with a combined technique of external manual pressure and internal pulling by forceps; the bowel was inspected, and the hernia was repaired. On the right side, the appendix was strongly adherent with the peritoneal vaginal duct, and the reduction was not possible. The appendix was dissected from the sac using a 3-mm monopolar hook and than reduced into the abdomen, then right herniorrhaphy was performed. Two days after surgery, the baby had fever and abdominal distension. He was re-operated through mini-Pfannenstiel incision and an ischemic appendix was identified and removed. Postoperative period was uneventful. In our case, laparoscopy allowed for simultaneous reduction under direct visual control, inspection of the incarcerated organ, definitive repair and incidentally discovery and treatment of the contralateral incarcerated Amyand′s hernia. In case of incarcerated appendix, appendectomy is preferable during the same procedure to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications

    A young girl with right ovarian torsion and left ovarian ectopy

    Get PDF
    Mayer-Rokitansky-K\ufcster-Hauser (MRKHS) syndrome refers to congenital hypoplasia/aplasia of the uterus, the cervix and the upper 2/3 of the vagina, in females with normal ovaries and fallopian tubes, secondary sexual characteristics and 46 XX karyotype. This condition originates from abnormal development of M\ufcller's paramesonephric ducts in the early stages of embryonic development. Kidney agenesis or malformations are the most commonly associated with unilateral kidney agenesis. Ovaries may be ectopic in 16-19% of MRKHS patients. Primary amenorrhoea, due to the absence of the uterus, is the most common presentation. Female karyotype confirmation is mandatory to differentiate it from complete androgen insensitivity syndrome and 17-alpha-hydroxylase deficiency. The management of MRKHS is multidisciplinary in order to encompass psychological, medical and surgical issues

    Preputioplasty associated with urethroplasty for correction of distal hypospadias: A prospective study and proposition of a new objective scoring system for evaluation of esthetic and functional outcome

    No full text
    Objective: Most surgical procedures for correction of hypospadias involve the removal of foreskin resulting in a circumcised penis. We report our experience and the medium-term results in the reconstruction of the foreskin during the correction of distal hypospadias. Materials and methods: Between January 2007 and December 2011, 445 patients aged between 8 and 120 months underwent surgical correction of hypospadias. In 354 out of 445 patients, we performed the reconstruction of the foreskin. Urethroplasty was performed according to either the TIPU (tubularized incised urethral plate urethroplasty; Snodgrass) technique (233/354, 66%) or MAGPI (meatal advancement glanduloplasty incorporated) procedure (121/354, 34%). In 91 out of 445 patients urethroplasty was performed using classic TIPU technique and they were circumcised. The cosmetic and functional results were evaluated using the Hypospadias Objective Penile Evaluation (HOPE) scoring system. Results: At a 12 months follow-up, 300 patients (84.7%) had retractable foreskin while 54 patients (15.3%) required postoperative steroid application. We had a total complication rate of 8.7%. As for preputioplasty, 16 patients (4.5%) had partial or total dehiscence of the reconstructed foreskin, one patient was circumcised for persistent phimosis (0.2%). As for urethroplasty complications, we recorded 11 fistulas (3.1%) and three stenosis (0.9%). The complication rate of the control group of circumcised patients was of 3.3% (2 fistulas [2.1%] and 1 stenosis [1.2%]). Conclusions: Our experience shows that foreskin reconstruction can be performed successfully in selected patients with distal hypospadias. However, preputioplasty add an additional 4.7% complication rate. As for the complications of urethroplasty, it seems that preputioplasty does not increase the incidence of complications on the urethra reconstruction. We propose a new objective scoring system (modified HOPE score) for evaluation of esthetic and functional outcome
    corecore