Outcome following lumbar disc surgery: the role of fibrosis

Failed-back surgery syndrome remains a challenge for spinal surgeons. It can be related to several causes, including poor surgical indication, misdiagnosis, surgical technique failure, spondilodiscitis and fibrosis. Fibrosis has been associated with a poorer outcome in lumbar disc surgery, although its role in the generation of symptoms is not yet clear. in this study, the authors have analyzed any possible correlation between the clinical outcome and the degree of fibrosis.Forty consecutive patients were enrolled in a prospective study. All of them had operations in the lower lumbar disc in a single level for the first time. Three months after the operation they were submitted to clinical outcome evaluations and questionnaires, including Numeric Pain Rating scales (NPR) for lumbar and leg pain, the McGill Pain Questionnaire, the Quebec Back Pain Disability scale (QBPD) and Straight Leg Raising test. These data were correlated with the degree of fibrosis as revealed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).After 3 months, the NPR values for lumbar and leg pain ranged from 0 to 8 (mean 2.32 and 1.67 respectively). the values of the post-operative QBPD scale ranged from 1 to 71 (mean 25.9). Every patient showed a varied degree of fibrosis on MRI. However, statistical analysis depicted no significant correlation between fibrosis and a poorer clinical outcome for pain and disability.The authors found no correlation between excessive fibrosis with lumbar and leg pain, disability or straight leg resistance. the role of fibrosis in the generation of symptoms in patients who have had lumbar disc surgery should be reevaluated.Inst Neurol Curitiba, CINDOR, BR-80730060 Curitiba, Parana, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilCEDIP, Curitiba, Parana, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of Scienc

O uso da ultra-sonografia no diagnóstico e evolução da apendicite aguda Ultrasonography in the diagnosis and evolution of acute appendicitis

OBJETIVO: Aproximadamente 35% das apendicites agudas têm diagnóstico clínico pré-operatório duvidoso ou incorreto, particularmente grávidas e crianças. A ultra-sonografia, em virtude do seu baixo custo e facilidade de acesso, tem-se mostrado um método diagnóstico importante. Este estudo propôs-se a demonstrar os principais achados de imagem das diversas fases da apendicite, com o objetivo de auxiliar o ultra-sonografista no diagnóstico precoce desta afecção. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: São relatados 14 casos de ultra-sonografias abdominais realizadas no período de janeiro a julho de 2001, em pacientes que se apresentavam com quadro de abdome agudo. O exame foi realizado com transdutores de 3,5 MHz e 7,5 MHz. RESULTADOS: O estudo ultra-sonográfico antes da perfuração demonstra apêndice não compressível, com espessamento e perda focal da definição das paredes. Após a perfuração, o apêndice pode não ser visualizado ao exame de ultra-sonografia, sendo evidenciadas alterações secundárias como efeito de massa, formação de plastrão, liquefação e formação de abscesso, além de ar dentro da coleção. CONCLUSÃO: O diagnóstico precoce da apendicite é essencial para minimizar a morbidade, que se mantém elevada se ocorrer perfuração. Apresentações atípicas resultam em confusão diagnóstica e retarde no tratamento. As principais dificuldades e erros são apendicite retrocecal, apendicite focal ou perfurada.<br>OBJECTIVE: Approximately 35% of the patients with acute appendicitis have a doubtful or incorrect preoperatory diagnosis, particularly in pregnant women and children. Ultrasonography has demonstrated to be an important means of diagnosis due to its low cost and easy access. This study is intended to show the main imaging findings of the many phases of appendicitis, thus helping the ultrasonographist to establish an early diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January to June 2001, 14 patients with acute abdominal pain were submitted to abdominal ultrasound using 3.5 MHz and 7.5 MHz transducers. RESULTS: The ultrasound findings when perforation had not occurred demonstrated a noncompressible appendix, thickening and focal lack of definition of the walls. After perforation had occurred the appendix could no longer be visualized at ultrasonography. Secondary changes such as mass effect, phlegmous changes, liquefaction and abscess formation, and gas bubbles within a collection were identified. CONCLUSION: An early diagnosis of appendicitis is essential in order to minimize morbidity that is high when perforation occurs. Atypical presentations result in misdiagnosis and treatment delay. The main diagnostic challenges are retrocecal, focal or perforated appendicitis