12 research outputs found
Prevalence of hypoalbuminemia in outpatients with HIV/AIDS
<div><p>Abstract INTRODUCTION: Hypoalbuminemia may predict progression of disease and mortality in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). This study was conducted to investigate the risk factors associated with hypoalbuminemia in outpatients with HIV/AIDS. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in 196 outpatients with HIV/AIDS. RESULTS: The prevalence of hypoalbuminemia was 11.7%. The only risk factor associated with hypoalbuminemia was current antiretroviral therapy (no exposure: odds ratio=3.46, 95% confidence interval=1.20-10.02). CONCLUSIONS: The monitoring of plasma albumin is key to determine when antiretroviral therapy should be initiated in individuals not exposed to antiretroviral medicines.</p></div
Risk Factors Associated with HIV Infection among Male Homosexuals and Bisexuals Followed in an Open Cohort Study: Project Horizonte, Brazil (1994-2010)
<div><p>Background</p><p>There has recently been an increase in HIV infection rates among men who have sex with men (MSM). This study aimed at investigating risk factors associated with incident HIV infection in a MSM cohort–Project Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.</p><p>Methodology</p><p>This is a nested case-control study in an ongoing open cohort of homosexual and bisexual men, carried out in 1994–2010, during which 1,085 volunteers were enrolled. Each HIV seroconverted volunteer (case) was compared with three randomly selected HIV negative controls, matched by admission date and age (±3 years). During follow-up, 93 volunteers seroconverted and were compared with 279 controls.</p><p>Principal Findings</p><p>The risk factors associated with HIV seroconversion were: contact with partner’s blood during sexual relations (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.2–11.6), attendance at gay saunas in search for sexual partners (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.3–5.4), occasional intake of alcohol when flirting and engaging in sexual activity (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.3–5.1), inconsistent use of condoms in receptive anal sex (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.1–5.4), little interest to look up information about AIDS (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.0–6.7) particularly in newspapers (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.4–8.1).</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>This study shows that MSM are still engaging in risk behavior, such as unprotected anal intercourse, despite taking part in a cohort study on various preventive measures. New preventive strategies in touch with the epidemic’s development and the specificities of this particular population are needed.</p></div
Final conditional logistic regression model: HIV risk factors among MSM, Project Horizonte, 1994–2010.
(a)<p>OR = Adjusted Odds Ratio (matched by age and admission time).</p><p>Final conditional logistic regression model: HIV risk factors among MSM, Project Horizonte, 1994–2010.</p
Univariate analysis of sexual behavior, comparing HIV-positive and HIV-negative controls, Project Horizonte, 1994–2010.
(a)<p>OR = Matched Odds Ratio.</p><p>Data for refusals, “not done” and “don’t know” are not shown.</p><p>Sexual practices were analyzed independently of the type of partnership (steady or casual).</p><p>Univariate analysis of sexual behavior, comparing HIV-positive and HIV-negative controls, Project Horizonte, 1994–2010.</p
Univariate analysis of the contextual characteristics, comparing HIV-positive and HIV-negative controls, Project Horizonte, 1994–2010.
(a)<p>OR = Matched Odds Ratio (matched by age and admission time).</p>(b)<p>Only for those that reported attendance of sex venues.</p><p>Data for “no applicable” and “no response” are not shown.</p><p>Univariate analysis of the contextual characteristics, comparing HIV-positive and HIV-negative controls, Project Horizonte, 1994–2010.</p
Baseline survey; evaluations I, II, and III; and losses to follow-up, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais.
<p>Baseline survey; evaluations I, II, and III; and losses to follow-up, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais.</p
Dog-months of follow-up, failure events (seroconversion), and incidence rates with 95% CIs, Brazil 2010.
a, b, c<p>10, 16, and 26 months after baseline, respectively;</p>d<p>Incidence rate/1000 dogs-months. Abbreviations: LZOON, Laboratory of Zoonosis of the Belo Horizonte Health Department; LIMP, Laboratory of Immunopathology of the Federal University of Ouro Preto; CI, confidence interval.</p
Univariate analysis (<i>p</i><0.25) according to the characteristics of the dogs (<i>n</i> = 455), Brazil 2010.
<p>Abbreviations: LZOON, Laboratory of Zoonosis of the Belo Horizonte Health Department; LIMP, Laboratory of Immunopathology of the Federal University of Ouro Preto; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.</p
Univariate analysis (<i>p</i><0.25) according to the understanding of the disease and environmental conditions, Brazil 2010.
<p>Abbreviations: LZOON, Laboratory of Zoonosis of the Belo Horizonte Health Department; LIMP, Laboratory of Immunopathology of the Federal University of Ouro Preto; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.</p
Characteristics of dogs in the cohort study, Brazil 2010.
<p>Characteristics of dogs in the cohort study, Brazil 2010.</p