Angiotensin receptor/Neprilysin inhibitor effects in CRTd non-responders: From epigenetic to clinical beside

We evaluated whether Angiotensin receptor/Neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) reduce heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and deaths in cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRTd) non-responders patients at 12 months of follow-up, modulating microRNAs (miRs) implied in adverse cardiac remodeling

Left bundle branch pacing and cardiac remodeling in HF patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: epigenetic pathways and clinical outcomes

BackgroundLeft bundle branch (LBB) pacing could achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients who cannot be resynchronized via the placement of the left ventricle (LV) lead into the coronary sinus. LBB pacing could improve cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with LBB block who are affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Study hypothesisLBB pacing could increase the number of CRT responders and lead to the best clinical outcomes in HF patients with T2DM, inducing cardiac remodeling and improving left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) via microRNA (miR) modulation.MethodsIn a multicenter observational study, we enrolled 334 HF patients with LBB block and an indication to receive LBB pacing for CRT. In these patients, we evaluated the CRT responder rate, clinical outcomes, and miR expression at 1 year of follow-up.ResultsAt 1 year of follow-up, we had 223 responders (66.8%), 132 hospitalizations for HF (39.5%), 24 cardiac deaths (7.2%), and 37 all-cause deaths (11.1%), with a higher rate of HF hospitalizations (77 (69.4%) vs 55 (24.7%), p < 0.05), and cardiac deaths (13 (11.7% vs 11 (4.9%), p < 0.05) in non-responders vs responders. At the end of follow-up, we found the lowest expression of miR-26, miR-29, miR-30, miR-92, and miR-145 in LBB-pacing non-responders vs responders (p < 0.05), and a direct correlation between miR-30 (0.340, [0.833–1.915]; p 0.001), the 6-minute-walking test (6MWT; 0.168, [0.008–0.060]; p 0.011), angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI; 0.157, [0.183–4.877]; p 0.035), sodium-glucose-transporter-2 inhibitors (0.245, [2.242–7.283]; p 0.001), and LVEF improvements. C reactive protein (CRP) inversely correlated with LVEF improvement (−0.220, [-(0.066–0.263)]; p 0.001). ARNI (1.373, CI 95% [1.007–1.872], p 0.045), miR-30 (2.713, CI 95% [1.543–4.769], p 0.001), and 6MWT (1.288, CI 95% [1.084–1.998], p 0.001) were predictors of LBB pacing responders at 1 year of follow-up.ConclusionLBB-pacing responders evidenced miR modulation, which was linked to significant improvement of the cardiac pump. Specifically, miR-30 was linked to cardiac pump improvement and predicted responders at 1 year of follow-up in patients with T2DM

SGLT-2 inhibitors and in-stent restenosis-related events after acute myocardial infarction: an observational study in patients with type 2 diabetes

BackgroundNo study evaluated the incidence of intra-stent restenosis (ISR)-related events in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated or not with sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i).MethodsWe recruited 377 patients with T2DM and AMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among them, 177 T2DM were treated with SGLT2 inhibitors before PCI. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiac death, re-infarction, and heart failure related to ISR. In patients without ISR, minimal lumen area and minimal lumen diameter were assessed by coronary CT-angiography at 1-year follow-up.ResultsGlycemic control was similar in SGLT2i-treated patients and never SGLT2i-users. The incidence of ISR-related MACE was higher in never SGLT2i-users compared with SGLT2i-treated patients, an effect independent of glycemic status (HR = 0.418, 95% CI = 0.241-0.725, P = 0.002) and observed also in the subgroup of patients with HbA1c < 7% (HR = 0.393, 95% CI = 0.157-0.984, P = 0.027). In patients without the event, the stent patency was greater in SGLT2i-treated patients compared with never SGLT2i-users at 1-year follow-up.ConclusionsSGLT2i treatment in T2DM is associated with a reduced incidence of ISR-related events, independently of glycemic control

Angiotensin receptor/Neprilysin inhibitor effects in CRTd non-responders: From epigenetic to clinical beside

Objectives: We evaluated whether Angiotensin receptor/Neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) reduce heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and deaths in cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRTd) non-responders patients at 12 months of follow-up, modulating microRNAs (miRs) implied in adverse cardiac remodeling.Background: adverse cardiac remodeling characterized by left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) reduction, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESv) increase, and the 6-minute walking test (6MWT) reduction are relevant pathological mechanisms in CRTd non-responders and could be linked to changes in miRNAs (miRs), regulating cardiac fibrosis, apoptosis, and hypertrophy.Methods: miRs levels and clinical outcomes (LVEF, cardiac deaths, and 6MWT) were evaluated at baseline and one year of follow-up in CRTd non-responders divided into ARNI-users and Non-ARNI users.Results: At baseline, there were no differences in levels of inflammatory markers, miR-18, miR-145, and miR-181 (p > 0.05) between Non-ARNI users (n 106) and ARNI-users (n 312). At one year of follow-up, ARNI-users vs. Non-ARNI users showed lowest inflammatory markers (p < 0.01) and miR-181 levels (p < 0.01) and higher values of miR-18 (p < 0.01)and miR-145 (p < 0.01). At one year of follow-up, ARNI-users had a higher increase of LVEF (p < 0.01) and 6MWT (p < 0.01) along with a more significant reduction of LVESv (p < 0.01) compared to Non-ARNI users. Cox regression analysis evidenced that ARNI-based therapies increase the probability of anti-remodeling effects of CRTd. Based on symptomatic improvements, echocardiographic and functional classification improvements, 37 (34.9%) patients among ARNI-users became responders, while only twenty (6.4%) patients became responders among Non-ARNi-users.Conclusions: ARNI might influence epigenetic mechanisms modulating miRs implicated in the adverse cardiac remodeling responses to CRTd