Proximal repair in acute type A aortic dissection: The dark side of the root

Abstract There is no agreement regarding the best treatment for proximal repair in acute type A aortic dissection. Isolated replacement of the ascending aorta has been shown effective but can leave patients at a higher risk of further aortic procedures. The interpretation of the results coming from the literature is difficult because of the great variability of the clinical scenarios and the anatomic extension of the dissection. The analysis of the risk factors suggests that the presence of the underlying root pathology and a more extensive involvement of the aortic root should address the surgeon towards a more radical proximal resection

Normothermic frozen elephant trunk: our experience and literature review

none6Background and Objective: The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique has undoubtable advantages in treating complex and extensive disease of the aortic arch and the thoracic descending aorta. Despite several improvements in cardiopulmonary bypass conduction and surgical strategy, operative times and the institution of systemic circulatory arrest remain the main determinants of early mortality, cerebral/spinal cord injury and visceral organs dysfunction. We have conducted this review to highlight the recent technical advances in arch and FET surgery aiming at the reduction/avoidance of systemic circulatory arrest, and their impact on early outcomes. Methods: A literature search (from origin to January 2022), limited to publications in English, was performed on online platforms and database (PubMed, Google, ResearchGate). After a further review of associated or similar papers, we found 4 experiences, described by 11 peer-reviewed published papers, which focused on minimising or avoiding systemic circulatory arrest during total arch replacement plus stenting of the descending thoracic aorta. Key Content and Findings: Recent experiences reported the use of an antegrade endoaortic balloon, advanced and inflated into the stent graft, to provide an early systemic reperfusion soon after the deployment of the stented portion of the FET prosthesis and minimize the circulatory arrest time (down to a mean of 5 minutes), thus avoiding the need of moderate or deep hypothermia (mean systemic temperature 28-30 ???) while allowing a complete arch and FET repair. Our approach, based on off-pump retrograde vascular stent graft deployment in distal arch/descending thoracic aorta, and the use of a retrograde endoballoon, allows the repair of extensive aortic pathologies during uninterrupted normothermic cerebral and lower body perfusion. Conclusions: The use of endoballoon occlusion has emerged in recent years as a safe and effective strategy to allow distal perfusion during FET repair. This technique minimizes or avoids the detrimental effects of hypothermia and systemic circulatory arrest and significantly reduces the operative times.Malvindi, PG; Alfonsi, J; Berretta, P; Cefarelli, M; Gatta, E; Di Eusanio, MMalvindi, Pg; Alfonsi, J; Berretta, P; Cefarelli, M; Gatta, E; Di Eusanio,

safety and efficacy of miniaturized extracorporeal circulation when compared with off pump and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting evidence synthesis from a comprehensive bayesian framework network meta analysis of 134 randomized controlled trials involving 22 778 patients

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the standard of care in patients with extensive coronary artery disease. Yet the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is believed to be a major determinant of perioperative morbidity. Novel techniques are sought to tackle the shortcomings of CPB, among them off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and miniaturized extracorporeal circulation (MECC) systems have been extensively tested in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To assess perioperative safety and efficacy of MECC and OPCAB when compared with conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC).Published literature and major congress proceedings were screened for RCTs evaluating the safety and efficacy of MECC, OPCAB and CECC. Selected end-points such as 30-day all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebral stroke, postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) and renal dysfunction were assessed in a Bayesian-framework network meta-analysis.A total of 134 studies with 22 778 patients were included. When compared with CECC, both OPCAB and MECC significantly reduced 30-day all-cause mortality [odds ratios (95% credible intervals): 0.75 (0.51-0.99) and 0.46 (0.22-0.91)], respectively. No differences in respect to MI were demonstrated with either strategy. OPCAB, when compared with CECC, reduced the odds of cerebral stroke [0.57 (0.34-0.80)]; 60% reduction was observed with MECC when compared with CECC [0.40 (0.19-0.78)]. Both OPCAB and MECC reduced the odds of POAF [0.66 (0.48-0.90) and 0.62 (0.35-0.98), respectively] when compared with CECC. OPCAB conferred over 30% reduction of renal dysfunction when compared with CECC [0.69 (0.46-0.92)]. MECC reduced these odds by more than 50% [0.47 (0.24-0.89)]. Ranking of treatments emerging from the probability analysis (highest to lowest SUCRA values) was MECC followed by OPCAB and CECC.MECC and OPCAB both improve perioperative outcomes following coronary bypass surgery when compared with conventional CABG performed with extracorporeal circulation. MECC may represent an attractive compromise between OPCAB and CECC

Modes of failure of Trifecta aortic valve prosthesis

none4siObjectives: Several concerns have been recently raised regarding the durability of Trifecta prostheses. Different mechanisms of early failure were reported. Our aim was to study in a large population the modes of failure of Trifecta valves. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement with a Trifecta prosthesis during the period 2010-2018. Details regarding the mode of failure and haemodynamic dysfunction were collected for patients who underwent reintervention for structural valve failure. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival. Competing risk analysis was performed to calculate the cumulative risk of reintervention for structural valve failure. Results: The overall population comprises 1228 patients (1084 TF model and 144 TFGT model). Forty-four patients-mean patients' age at the time of the first implant 69 (standard deviation: 12) years and 61% female-underwent reintervention for structural valve failure after a median time of 63 [44-74] months. The cumulative incidence of reintervention for structural valve failure was 0.16% (SE 0.11%), 1.77% (SE 0.38%) and 5.11% (SE 0.98%) at 1, 5 and 9 years, respectively. In 24/44 patients (55%), a leaflet tear with dehiscence at the commissure level was found intraoperatively or described by imaging assessment. The cumulative incidence of reintervention for failure due to leaflet(s) tear was 0.16% (SE 0.11%), 1.08% (SE 0.29%) and 3.03% (SE 0.88%) at 1, 5 and 9 years, respectively. Conclusions: Leaflet(s) tear with dehiscence along the stent post was the main mode of early failure, up to 5 years, after Trifecta valves' implantation.nonePietro Giorgio Malvindi; Hassan Kattach; Suvitesh Luthra; Sunil OhriMalvindi, Pietro Giorgio; Kattach, Hassan; Luthra, Suvitesh; Ohri, Suni

Durability of Mitral Valve Bioprostheses: A meta-analysis of long-term follow-up studies

Porcine and pericardial valves exhibited similar freedom from structural valve deterioration after aortic valve replacement. Limited data exists regarding their durability at long-term follow-up in the mitral position

del Nido and Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate cardioplegia in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: A propensity-Match study

Introduction: In the last decade, del Nido cardioplegia has been embedded in adult cardiac surgery involving CABG and aortic valve surgical procedures. We reviewed our early experience with del Nido cardioplegia in the setting of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Methods: Data on 120 consecutive patients operated between 03/2021 and 06/2022 were retrieved from our internal database (infective endocarditis and urgent operations were excluded). Patients were divided into two groups according to the use of Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate or del Nido cardioplegia. A propensity match analysis was performed using thirteen preoperative and intraoperative variables. Several intraoperative data and early postoperative outcomes were investigated, including cardiac enzymes (Troponin I HS and CK-MB) measured upon arrival in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), after 12 hours and everyday thereafter. Results: There was no difference in preoperative characteristics and surgical techniques between both unmatched and matched Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate and del Nido populations. Patients in the del Nido group received a lower volume of cardioplegia (p < 0.001) and ultrafiltration during CPB (p < 0.001). Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate was associated with a lower rate of post cross-clamp spontaneous defibrillation (p < 0.001) and showed a lower level of blood sodium after CPB (p < 0.001). The release of cardiac enzymes was similar between the two groups (p = 0.72). There was no difference in terms of postoperative morbidity and 30 day mortality. Conclusions: del Nido cardioplegia in the setting of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery seemed safe with acceptable myocardial protection and excellent early outcomes