10 research outputs found
The role of perceived expertise and trustworthiness in research study and clinical trial recruitment: Perspectives of clinical research coordinators and African American and Black Caribbean patients
This study investigates the role of source credibility on minority participant recruitment, particularly African American and Black Caribbean patients. A total of nine focus groups (N = 48 participants) were conducted with both patient groups and clinical research coordinators (CRCs). Using the elaboration likelihood model as a guiding framework for analysis, this study found that the credibility of research coordinators (or other professionals who recruit for research studies and clinical trials) was instrumental in shaping attitudes of prospective participants. The perspectives of patients and CRCs aligned closely, with few exceptions. For both groups, professionalism and professional displays (clothing, institutional artifacts) enhanced perceived expertise, a core component of credibility. Trustworthiness, another important component of credibility, was fostered through homophily between recruiter and patient, expressions of goodwill and assuaging anxiety about CRCs’ financial motivations for recruitment. Additionally, CRCs believed that credibility was supported when CRCs could emphasize transparency and truthfulness in communication. The importance of these findings for the development of empirically-based training programs to improve communication practices in recruitment contexts is discussed
The role of perceived expertise and trustworthiness in research study and clinical trial recruitment: Perspectives of clinical research coordinators and African American and Black Caribbean patients
This study investigates the role of source credibility on minority participant recruitment, particularly African American and Black Caribbean patients. A total of nine focus groups (N = 48 participants) were conducted with both patient groups and clinical research coordinators (CRCs). Using the elaboration likelihood model as a guiding framework for analysis, this study found that the credibility of research coordinators (or other professionals who recruit for research studies and clinical trials) was instrumental in shaping attitudes of prospective participants. The perspectives of patients and CRCs aligned closely, with few exceptions. For both groups, professionalism and professional displays (clothing, institutional artifacts) enhanced perceived expertise, a core component of credibility. Trustworthiness, another important component of credibility, was fostered through homophily between recruiter and patient, expressions of goodwill and assuaging anxiety about CRCs’ financial motivations for recruitment. Additionally, CRCs believed that credibility was supported when CRCs could emphasize transparency and truthfulness in communication. The importance of these findings for the development of empirically-based training programs to improve communication practices in recruitment contexts is discussed
Recommended from our members
Interactive online skin cancer training game “Whack-a-Mole” assesses training strategies and real-time feedback on melanoma identification among U.S. adults
Abstract only10564Background: Cutaneous melanoma is a deadly form of skin cancer. Several studies have shown that early melanoma detection is associated with decreased mortality through self-examination and dermatology full-body skin exams. ABCD rule and the ugly duckling sign (UDS) are used to identify melanomas, but little research has explored the comparative efficacy of these approaches. This investigation compares the effectiveness of different mole identification training strategies and explores the effect of real-time feedback on decision-making. Methods: We developed an online melanoma identification game that tests differences between training types and expert feedback on mole identification. This online RCT tests a 4 (training: ABCD, UDS, both, control) X 3 (feedback: standard, motivational, control) factorial design on melanoma identification, skin cancer beliefs (perceived susceptibility and self-efficacy), and skin cancer prevention intentions. Standard feedback included expert evaluations of moles, whereas motivational feedback added statements grounded in fear appeals theory to encourage skin self-examination. An online research panel service was used to recruit 1025 US adults. Participants were randomly assigned to condition, completed a pretest, participated in the game intervention, and completed a posttest. Gameplay incorporates the same mechanics as Tinder (swipe left on benign moles and swipe right on malignant moles). Results: In total, participants reviewed 48 moles, 12 of which were melanomas. We used two-way ANCOVA for the analysis. ABCD training resulted in significantly higher melanoma identification than the control ( p =.011). Every training type resulted in significantly higher self-efficacy than the control ( p =.007). Additionally, there was a significant main effect of feedback on self-efficacy ( p =.001), where both standard and motivational feedback elicited significantly higher levels of self-efficacy than the control condition. Around 88% of participants intend to conduct skin self-exams and wear sunscreen. Conclusions: Our data suggests that “Whack a Mole” is an efficacious tool for melanoma training. ABCD and UDS training with interactive feedback are important to improve accuracy and ability for melanoma identification
Recommended from our members
When Feedback Leads to False Confidence: A Curious Outcome of a Game-Based Health Intervention
Whack-a-Mole is a melanoma identification training game developed at the University of Miami to evaluate the effectiveness of different identification training techniques using immediate personalized feedback. Two widely implemented training systems are used to identify malignant melanoma through a skin exam: ABCDE, a mnemonic for the five factors that increase likely diagnoses, and the ugly duckling sign (UDS). The game system randomized the training types the player received, in addition to a hybrid approach and a control condition. The game delivered standard and motivational feedback to a subset of players in each of these conditions as they identified moles. Both the standard feedback and motivational feedback led to higher perceived self-efficacy as compared to conditions with no feedback, regardless of whether or not the player was successful at identifying malignant moles
Focus group questions for clinical research coordinators.
Focus group questions for clinical research coordinators.</p
Recommended from our members
When Feedback Leads to False Confidence: A Curious Outcome of a Game-Based Health Intervention
Whack-a-Mole is a melanoma identification training game developed at the University of Miami to evaluate the effectiveness of different identification training techniques using immediate personalized feedback. Two widely implemented training systems are used to identify malignant melanoma through a skin exam: ABCDE, a mnemonic for the five factors that increase likely diagnoses, and the ugly duckling sign (UDS). The game system randomized the training types the player received, in addition to a hybrid approach and a control condition. The game delivered standard and motivational feedback to a subset of players in each of these conditions as they identified moles. Both the standard feedback and motivational feedback led to higher perceived self-efficacy as compared to conditions with no feedback, regardless of whether or not the player was successful at identifying malignant moles
Focus group questions for patients.
This study investigates the role of source credibility on minority participant recruitment, particularly African American and Black Caribbean patients. A total of nine focus groups (N = 48 participants) were conducted with both patient groups and clinical research coordinators (CRCs). Using the elaboration likelihood model as a guiding framework for analysis, this study found that the credibility of research coordinators (or other professionals who recruit for research studies and clinical trials) was instrumental in shaping attitudes of prospective participants. The perspectives of patients and CRCs aligned closely, with few exceptions. For both groups, professionalism and professional displays (clothing, institutional artifacts) enhanced perceived expertise, a core component of credibility. Trustworthiness, another important component of credibility, was fostered through homophily between recruiter and patient, expressions of goodwill and assuaging anxiety about CRCs’ financial motivations for recruitment. Additionally, CRCs believed that credibility was supported when CRCs could emphasize transparency and truthfulness in communication. The importance of these findings for the development of empirically-based training programs to improve communication practices in recruitment contexts is discussed.</div
Participant demographics.
This study investigates the role of source credibility on minority participant recruitment, particularly African American and Black Caribbean patients. A total of nine focus groups (N = 48 participants) were conducted with both patient groups and clinical research coordinators (CRCs). Using the elaboration likelihood model as a guiding framework for analysis, this study found that the credibility of research coordinators (or other professionals who recruit for research studies and clinical trials) was instrumental in shaping attitudes of prospective participants. The perspectives of patients and CRCs aligned closely, with few exceptions. For both groups, professionalism and professional displays (clothing, institutional artifacts) enhanced perceived expertise, a core component of credibility. Trustworthiness, another important component of credibility, was fostered through homophily between recruiter and patient, expressions of goodwill and assuaging anxiety about CRCs’ financial motivations for recruitment. Additionally, CRCs believed that credibility was supported when CRCs could emphasize transparency and truthfulness in communication. The importance of these findings for the development of empirically-based training programs to improve communication practices in recruitment contexts is discussed.</div