Aseptic Barriers Allow a Clean Contact for Contaminated Stethoscope Diaphragms.

Objective:To determine whether a single-use stethoscope diaphragm barrier surface remains aseptic when placed on pathogen-contaminated stethoscopes. Methods:From May 31 to August 5, 2019, we tested 2 separate barriers using 3 different strains of 7 human pathogens, including extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium. Results:For all diaphragms with either of the 2 barriers tested, no growth was recorded for any of the pathogens. Stethoscopes with aseptic barriers remained sterile for up to 24 hours. These single-use barriers also provided aseptic surfaces when stethoscope diaphragms were inoculated with human specimens, including saliva, stool, urine, and sputum. Conclusion:Disposable aseptic diaphragm barriers may provide robust and efficient solutions to reduce transmission of pathogens via stethoscopes

B-type natriuretic peptide and renal function in the diagnosis of heart failure: An analysis from the BNP multinational study

https://nsuworks.nova.edu/nsudigital_harrison/3343/thumbnail.jp

Impact of Changing Activation Sequence on Bipolar Electrogram Amplitude for Voltage Mapping of Left Ventricular Infarcts Causing Ventricular Tachycardia

Introduction: Wavefront direction is a determinant of bipolar electrogram amplitude that could influence identification of low amplitude regions indicating infarction or scar. Methods: To assess the importance of activation sequence on electrogram amplitude 11 patients with prior infarction and ventricular tachycardia were studied. At 819 left ventricular sites bipolar electrograms were recorded during atrial pacing and ventricular pacing, followed by unipolar pacing with a stimulus of 10 mA at 2 ms. Sites with a pacing threshold > 10 mA were designated electrically unexcitable scar. Results: Areas of low voltage (≤1.5 mV) were present in all patients. Atrial paced and ventricular paced electrogram amplitudes were strongly correlated (r = 0.77; P 50% change in electrogram amplitude at 28% of sites and a > 100% change at 10% of sites, but only 8% of sites had an electrogram amplitude classified as abnormal (≦1.5 mV) with one activation sequence and normal (> 1.5 mV) with the other activation sequence. Electrically unexcitable scar (6% of sites) was associated with lower electrogram amplitude but could not be reliably identified based on electrogram amplitude alone for either activation sequence. Conclusion: Voltage maps created with bipolar recordings using these methods should be relatively robust depictions of abnormal ventricular regions despite variable catheter orientation and activation sequences that might be produced by different rhythm