Harga Diri Pada Remaja Menengah Putri Di SMA Negri 15 Kota Semarang

Self-esteem is a individual appraisal, feeling, view to her self or something related to her self that is expressed to the dimension Significance, Power, Competence,Virtue. This studywas aimedtoidentifythe relationshipbetween Self-Esteem anddietary behaviorin femaleadolescent (age 15-17 years) inSMAN 15 Semarang.Design used in this study are correlational descriptive with cross sectional design. Sampling was stratified random sampling method of 170 respondents and using chi-square analysis. The results of the study note that as many as 113 respondents (66.9%) had high self esteem and 57 respondents (33.1) has a low self esteem.Foryoung womenwhowant Togo on a dietshould pay attention tonutrition, health andnurses canplay a roleasan educator andcounselo

Model simulated hemodynamic data at baseline (rest) and fall in left ventricular contractility.

<p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>ω</p><p>P</p><p></p><p></p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean rotational speed; MAP, mean arterial pressure; <p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>P</p><p>la</p><p></p><p></p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean left atrial pressure; PLEVD, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; <p></p><p></p><p></p><p>CO</p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean cardiac output; <p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Q</p><p>P</p><p></p><p></p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean pump flow; PIQp, pump flow pulsatility; <p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Q</p><p>av</p><p></p><p></p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean aortic valve flow; LVC, Left ventricular contractility.<p></p><p>Model simulated hemodynamic data at baseline (rest) and fall in left ventricular contractility.</p

Comparison of preload controller vs. pulsatility and constant speed modes from baseline to hemorrhage.

<p>Absolute value changes in the: P_la, left atrial pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure; CO, cardiac output; Q_P, pump flow; Q_av, aortic valve flow.</p

Model simulated hemodynamic data at baseline (rest) and exercise with different controllers.

<p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>ω</p><p>P</p><p></p><p></p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean rotational speed; MAP, mean arterial pressure; <p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>P</p><p>la</p><p></p><p></p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean left atrial pressure; PLVED, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; <p></p><p></p><p></p><p>CO</p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean cardiac output; <p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Q</p><p>P</p><p></p><p></p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean pump flow; PIQp, pump flow pulsatility; <p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Q</p><p>av</p><p></p><p></p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean aortic valve flow.<p></p><p>Model simulated hemodynamic data at baseline (rest) and exercise with different controllers.</p

Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) gains used for both preload and pulsatility controlling methods.

<p>K_P, Proportional gain; K_I, Integral Gain; K_D, Derivative Gain.</p><p>Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) gains used for both preload and pulsatility controlling methods.</p

Comparison of preload controller vs. pulsatility and constant speed modes from baseline to exercise.

<p>Absolute value changes in the: P_la, left atrial pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure; CO, cardiac output; Q_P, pump flow; Q_av, aortic valve flow.</p

System response to variations in mean pump flow (QP-) for baseline and three test conditions.

<p>Fig. also shows the superimposed control line (C_L), where the minimum scaling factor (K) that allows the aortic valve to be closed in the baseline condition was chosen. LVC, left ventricular contractility; PLVED, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Q</p><p>p</p><p></p><p></p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean pump flow; Arrows indicate points where the aortic valve starts to open.<p></p

Comparison of preload controller vs. pulsatility and constant speed modes from baseline to reduced left ventricular contractility scenario.

<p>Absolute value changes in the: P_la, left atrial pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure; CO, cardiac output; Q_P, pump flow.</p

Block diagram of the PID controller for closed loop studies.

<p>CVS, cardiovascular system; LVAD, left ventricular assist device; PWM, pulse width modulation; PID, Proportional-integral-derivative controller; Q_P, instantaneous pump flow; </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Q</p><p>P</p><p></p><p></p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean pump flow; <p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Q</p><p>Pm</p><p></p><p></p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, measured mean pump flow; PLVED_m, measured left ventricular end diastolic pressure; PIQ_Pm, measured pump flow pulsatility; H_CVS, differential pressure between the left ventricle and the aorta. PLVED_m serves as the input to the preload controller (1), while both PIQ_Pm and <p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Q</p><p>Pm</p><p></p><p></p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p> are inputs to the pulsatility controller (2).<p></p

Model simulated hemodynamic data at baseline (rest) and with blood-loss for different controllers.

<p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>ω</p><p>P</p><p></p><p></p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean rotational speed;MAP, mean arterial pressure; <p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>P</p><p>la</p><p></p><p></p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean left atrial pressure; PLEVD, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; <p></p><p></p><p></p><p>CO</p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean cardiac output; <p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Q</p><p>P</p><p></p><p></p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean pump flow; PIQp, pump flow pulsatility; <p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Q</p><p>av</p><p></p><p></p>-<p></p><p></p><p></p>, mean aortic valve flow.<p></p><p>Model simulated hemodynamic data at baseline (rest) and with blood-loss for different controllers.</p