Superficial Parotidectomy Via Facelift Incision

he stigma of a Visually prominent facial scar following parotid surgery can be distressing to a young patient. The surgical technique of parotidectomy via a facelift incision is described and evaluated. Thirty patients with a benign lesion of the parotid gland underwent a partial superficial parotidectomy via a modified facelift incision. After operation, all patients had excellent cosmesis and complete function of the facial nerve. The facelift incision provides adequate exposure of the parotid gland for (partial) superficial parotidectomy. It can be offered as an alternative to a select group of patients who present with a small, mobile tumor in the tail of the parotid gland and an explicit request for an invisible postoperative scar

Lymphoscintigraphy and Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Accurate staging of the regional lymph nodes is crucial for the appropriate management of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). However, the current diagnostic modalities have low accuracy for N0 neck, and even the most optimal procedure, ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (USgFNAC), still has a sensitivity of only 42%-73%. In this study we evaluated whether the identification of the sentinel node might improve the selection of lymph nodes for USgFNAC. Twelve HNSCC patients received 3-4 peritumoral injections of 10-30 MBq 99mTc-labeled colloidal albumin, and the sentinel node was identified by dynamic scintigraphy and marked on the skin using a handheld probe, and/or by scintillation counting of the aspirates. After sentinel node identification USgFNAC was performed. Correct aspiration of the identified sentinel node(s) was confirmed by scintillation counting. In 11 out of 12 cases the sentinel node(s) could be visualized by dynamic planar imaging. In one case the sentinel node(s) were identified by scintillation counting only. In a number of patients different or supplementary lymph nodes were aspirated on the basis of sentinel node identification. These initial data strongly suggest that sentinel node identification might improve the staging of the neck by USgFNA

Molecular markers predict outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after concomitant cisplatin-based chemoradiation

Not all patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (HNSCC) benefit from concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiation, but reliable predictive markers for outcome after chemoradiation are scarce. We have investigated potential prognostic biomarkers for outcome in a large group of patients. Ninety-one tumor biopsies taken from consecutive HNSCC patients were evaluated for protein expression on a tissue microarray. Using immunohistochemistry, 18 biomarkers, involved in various cellular pathways were investigated. Univariable and multivariable proportional hazard analyses were performed to investigate associations between each individual marker and outcome. In addition, the global test was used to test all variables simultaneously and selected combinations of markers for an overall association with local control. Univariable analysis showed statistically significant increased relative risks of RB, P16 and MRP2 for local control and MDR1 and HIF-1 alpha for overall survival. MRP2, MDR1 and P16 levels were positively associated with outcome whereas RB and HIF-1 alpha had a negative relationship. Using Goeman's global testing no combination of markers was identified that was associated with local control. Grouping the markers according to their function revealed an association between a combination of 3 markers (P16, P21 and P27) and outcome (p = 0.05) was found. In the multivariable analysis, MRP2 and RB remained significant independent predictive markers for local control. This study describes the prognostic value of biomarkers for the outcome in patients uniformly treated with concurrent chemoradiation. MRP2 and RB were found to be associated with outcome in patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc