63 research outputs found
Phase II randomised discontinuation trial of brivanib in patients with advanced solid tumours
Background: Brivanib is a selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor
and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling. We performed a phase II randomised discontinuation trial of brivanib in 7 tumour types (soft-tissue sarcomas [STS], ovarian cancer, breast
cancer, pancreatic cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC], gastric/esophageal cancer and
transitional cell carcinoma [TCC]).
Patients and methods: During a 12-week open-label lead-in period, patients received brivanib
800 mg daily and were evaluated for FGF2 status by immunohistochemistry. Patients with stable disease at week 12 were randomised to brivanib or placebo. A study steering committee
evaluated week 12 response to determine if enrolment in a tumour type would continue.
The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS) for brivanib versus placebo in patients with FGF2-positive tumours.
Results: A total of 595 patients were treated, and stable disease was observed at the week 12
randomisation point in all tumour types. Closure decisions were made for breast cancer,
pancreatic cancer, NSCLC, gastric cancer and TCC. Criteria for expansion were met for
STS and ovarian cancer. In 53 randomised patients with STS and FGF2-positive tumours,
the median PFS was 2.8 months for brivanib and 1.4 months for placebo (hazard ratio
[HR]: 0.58, p Z 0.08). For all randomised patients with sarcomas, the median PFS was 2.8
months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4e4.0) for those treated with brivanib compared with
1.4 months (95% CI: 1.3e1.6) for placebo (HR Z 0.64, 95% CI: 0.38e1.07; p Z 0.09). In the
36 randomised patients with ovarian cancer and FGF2-positive tumours, the median PFS was
4.0 (95% CI: 2.6e4.2) months for brivanib and 2.0 months (95% CI: 1.2e2.7) for placebo (HR:
0.56, 95% CI: 0.26e1.22). For all randomised patients with ovarian cancer, the median PFS in
those randomised to brivanib was 4.0 months (95% CI: 2.6e4.2) and was 2.0 months (95% CI:
1.2e2.7) in those randomised to placebo (HR Z 0.54, 95% CI: 0.25e1.17; p Z 0.11).
Conclusion: Brivanib demonstrated activity in STS and ovarian cancer with an acceptable
safety profile. FGF2 expression, as defined in the protocol, is not a predictive biomarker of
the efficacy of brivanib
Vascular disrupting agents in clinical development
Growth of human tumours depends on the supply of oxygen and nutrients via the surrounding vasculature. Therefore tumour vasculature is an attractive target for anticancer therapy. Apart from angiogenesis inhibitors that compromise the formation of new blood vessels, a second class of specific anticancer drugs has been developed. These so-called vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) target the established tumour vasculature and cause an acute and pronounced shutdown of blood vessels resulting in an almost complete stop of blood flow, ultimately leading to selective tumour necrosis. As a number of VDAs are now being tested in clinical studies, we will discuss their mechanism of action and the results obtained in preclinical studies. Also data from clinical studies will be reviewed and some considerations with regard to the future development are given
Meta-analysis of GWAS of over 16,000 individuals with autism spectrum disorder highlights a novel locus at 10q24.32 and a significant overlap with schizophrenia.
To access publisher's full text version of this article, please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field or click on the hyperlink at the top of the page marked FilesOver the past decade genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been applied to aid in the understanding of the biology of traits. The success of this approach is governed by the underlying effect sizes carried by the true risk variants and the corresponding statistical power to observe such effects given the study design and sample size under investigation. Previous ASD GWAS have identified genome-wide significant (GWS) risk loci; however, these studies were of only of low statistical power to identify GWS loci at the lower effect sizes (odds ratio (OR) <1.15).We conducted a large-scale coordinated international collaboration to combine independent genotyping data to improve the statistical power and aid in robust discovery of GWS loci. This study uses genome-wide genotyping data from a discovery sample (7387 ASD cases and 8567 controls) followed by meta-analysis of summary statistics from two replication sets (7783 ASD cases and 11359 controls; and 1369 ASD cases and 137308 controls).We observe a GWS locus at 10q24.32 that overlaps several genes including PITX3, which encodes a transcription factor identified as playing a role in neuronal differentiation and CUEDC2 previously reported to be associated with social skills in an independent population cohort. We also observe overlap with regions previously implicated in schizophrenia which was further supported by a strong genetic correlation between these disorders (Rg = 0.23; P = 9 × 10(-6)). We further combined these Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) ASD GWAS data with the recent PGC schizophrenia GWAS to identify additional regions which may be important in a common neurodevelopmental phenotype and identified 12 novel GWS loci. These include loci previously implicated in ASD such as FOXP1 at 3p13, ATP2B2 at 3p25.3, and a 'neurodevelopmental hub' on chromosome 8p11.23.This study is an important step in the ongoing endeavour to identify the loci which underpin the common variant signal in ASD. In addition to novel GWS loci, we have identified a significant genetic correlation with schizophrenia and association of ASD with several neurodevelopmental-related genes such as EXT1, ASTN2, MACROD2, and HDAC4.National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH, USA)
ACE Network
Autism Genetic Resource Exchange (AGRE) is a program of Autism Speaks (USA)
The Autism Genome Project (AGP) from Autism Speaks (USA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Genome Canada
Health Research Board (Ireland)
Hilibrand Foundation (USA)
Medical Research Council (UK)
National Institutes of Health (USA)
Ontario Genomics Institute
University of Toronto McLaughlin Centre
Simons Foundation
Johns Hopkins
Autism Consortium of Boston
NLM Family foundation
National Institute of Health grants
National Health Medical Research Council
Scottish Rite
Spunk Fund, Inc.
Rebecca and Solomon Baker Fund
APEX Foundation
National Alliance for Research in Schizophrenia and Affective Disorders (NARSAD)
endowment fund of the Nancy Pritzker Laboratory (Stanford)
Autism Society of America
Janet M. Grace Pervasive Developmental Disorders Fund
The Lundbeck Foundation
universities and university hospitals of Aarhus and Copenhagen
Stanley Foundation
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Netherlands Scientific Organization
Dutch Brain Foundation
VU University Amsterdam
Trinity Centre for High Performance Computing through Science Foundation Ireland
Autism Genome Project (AGP) from Autism Speak
A systematic review of the reporting of Data Monitoring Committees' roles, interim analysis and early termination in pediatric clinical trials
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Decisions about interim analysis and early stopping of clinical trials, as based on recommendations of Data Monitoring Committees (DMCs), have far reaching consequences for the scientific validity and clinical impact of a trial. Our aim was to evaluate the frequency and quality of the reporting on DMC composition and roles, interim analysis and early termination in pediatric trials.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials published from 2005 to 2007 in a sample of four general and four pediatric journals. We used full-text databases to identify trials which reported on DMCs, interim analysis or early termination, and included children or adolescents. Information was extracted on general trial characteristics, risk of bias, and a set of parameters regarding DMC composition and roles, interim analysis and early termination.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>110 of the 648 pediatric trials in this sample (17%) reported on DMC or interim analysis or early stopping, and were included; 68 from general and 42 from pediatric journals. The presence of DMCs was reported in 89 of the 110 included trials (81%); 62 papers, including 46 of the 89 that reported on DMCs (52%), also presented information about interim analysis. No paper adequately reported all DMC parameters, and nine (15%) reported all interim analysis details. Of 32 trials which terminated early, 22 (69%) did not report predefined stopping guidelines and 15 (47%) did not provide information on statistical monitoring methods.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Reporting on DMC composition and roles, on interim analysis results and on early termination of pediatric trials is incomplete and heterogeneous. We propose a minimal set of reporting parameters that will allow the reader to assess the validity of trial results.</p
- …