Morphological, anatomical and histochemical characterization of Cuphea carthagenensis (Jacq.) JF Macbr. (Lythraceae)

(Morphological, anatomical and histochemical characterization of Cuphea carthagenensis (Jacq.) J.F. Macbr. (Lythraceae)). Cuphea carthagenensis (Jacq.) J.F. Macbr. is an herb, which occurs preferably in wet places. Amongst other species of the genus, C. carthagenensis is distinguished for its great chemical potential and frequent use in popular medicine. In this study the morphological and anatomical structures were identified, as well as the histochemical characterization was done. Samples of root, stem and leaves were collected from adult plants. This material was processed for anatomical and histochemical analysis in light microscopy and for morphological analysis, in scanning electron microscopy Important morphological and anatomical considerations were added for C. carthagenensis, such as: the occurrence of aerenchymatous phellem with suberized layers; the types of trichomes present in the vegetative organs, the characterization of secretory trichomes, as well as the secreted substances. The groups of secondary metabolites presents in the root, stem and leaf of C. carthagenensis with more intense histochemical reaction were: proanthocyanidins, phenolic compounds, acids polysaccharides (mucilage especially) and lipids.25251752

Criteria for the use of omics-based predictors in clinical trials: Explanation and elaboration

High-throughput 'omics' technologies that generate molecular profiles for biospecimens have been extensively used in preclinical studies to reveal molecular subtypes and elucidate the biological mechanisms of disease, and in retrospective studies on clinical specimens to develop mathematical models to predict clinical endpoints. Nevertheless, the translation of these technologies into clinical tests that are useful for guiding management decisions for patients has been relatively slow. It can be difficult to determine when the body of evidence for an omics-based test is sufficiently comprehensive and reliable to support claims that it is ready for clinical use, or even that it is ready for definitive evaluation in a clinical trial in which it may be used to direct patient therapy. Reasons for this difficulty include the exploratory and retrospective nature of many of these studies, the complexity of these assays and their application to clinical specimens, and the many potential pitfalls inherent in the development of mathematical predictor models from the very high-dimensional data generated by these omics technologies. Here we present a checklist of criteria to consider when evaluating the body of evidence supporting the clinical use of a predictor to guide patient therapy. Included are issues pertaining to specimen and assay requirements, the soundness of the process for developing predictor models, expectations regarding clinical study design and conduct, and attention to regulatory, ethical, and legal issues. The proposed checklist should serve as a useful guide to investigators preparing proposals for studies involving the use of omics-based tests. The US National Cancer Institute plans to refer to these guidelines for review of proposals for studies involving omics tests, and it is hoped that other sponsors will adopt the checklist as well. © 2013 McShane et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd

SAFETY OF INTRAVENOUS HIGH-DOSE DIPYRIDAMOLE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

Clinical data on 10,451 high-dose (up to 0.84 mg/kg over 10 minutes) dipyridamole-echocardiography tests (DET) performed in 9,122 patients were prospectively collected from 33 echocardiographic laboratories, each contributing >100 tests. All patients were studied for documented or suspected coronary artery disease (1,117 early [<18 days] after acute myocardial infarction and 293 had unstable angina). Significant side effects including major adverse reactions and minor but limiting side effects occurred in 113 patients (1.2%). Major adverse reactions occurred in 7 cases (0.07%). In 6 of these cases, adverse reactions were associated with echocardiographically assessed ischemia and included 1 prolonged cardiac asystole (complicated by acute myocardial infarction and coma, with death after 23 days), 1 short-lasting cardiac asystole, 2 myocardial infarctions, 1 pulmonary edema and 1 sustained ventricular tachycardia. In all 6 cases, the cardiologist-echocardiographer performing the study had a limited experience (<100 tests) with DET, and at off-line reading in 5 cases, the obvious echo-positivity preceded the onset of complications by 1 to 5 minutes. The only ischemia-independent major side effect was a short-lasting cardiac asystole that was reversed by aminophylline and atropine. Significant side effects associated with echocardiographically assessed ischemia occurred in 89 additional cases (21 with and 68 without concomitant echocardiographically assessed myocardial ischemia). The most frequent of these side effects was hypotension or bradycardia, or both, which occurred in 40 patients with negative and 6 with positive DET. In all cases, side effects promptly subsided after aminophylline. In 1,857 cases, the high dose was not given for echo-positivity before the eighth minute. In 60 cases, the full high dose was not given despite the echocardiographic negativity for limiting side effect, yielding an overall feasibility of high-dose DET of 99%. Aminophylline was routinely administered also at the end of negative tests. Noticeable side effects occurred in 17 cases. In 13 patients (7 with negative and 6 with positive DET) transient ST-segment elevation occurred 1 to 4 minutes after the onset of aminophylline infusion, accompanied by regional dyssynergy. All 13 patients had variant angina. Thus, high-dose DET is reasonably safe and well-tolerated, even early after acute myocardial infarction and in patients with unstable angina, when selectively used in patients in whom the lower dose did not induce either echocardiographic signs of ischemia or limiting side effects