Comparison of conditioning regimens of various intensities for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT using HLA-identical sibling donors in AML and MDS with <10% BM blasts: a report from EBMT

Item does not contain fulltextIn this multicenter retrospective study, the long-term outcomes of 878 adults with AML and refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) with BM blasts <10% who underwent transplantation with an HLA-identical sibling donor between 1998 and 2004 were analyzed according to four regimens of conditioning intensity: reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) (either intermediate RIC (IntermRIC) or non-myeloablative (NMA) RIC), and myeloablative conditioning (MC) in 718 patients (either conventional MC or hyperintense MC. In multivariate cox analysis, patients undergoing NMA transplantation had lower non-relapse mortality risk in the first 100 days after transplantation (P<0.01), but a higher risk beyond day +100 (P=0.02), as well as higher relapse incidence in the first 12 months (P<0.01), but the risk was similar in all groups beyond 12 months. The probabilities of PFS and OS up to 7 years were significantly lower only in the NMA subgroup (P</=0.01 for both). The 7-year OS was 53%, 29%, 56% and 51%, respectively. Our data suggest that prospective studies comparing RIC regimens (especially IntermRIC) with MC are appropriate in patients with AML and RAEB who are in a non-advanced disease status

The European LeukemiaNet AML Working Party consensus statement on allogeneic HSCT for patients with AML in remission: an integrated-risk adapted approach

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is frequently applied as part of the treatment in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in their first or subsequent remission. Allogeneic HSCT reduces relapse, but nonrelapse mortality and morbidity might counterbalance this beneficial effect. Here, we review recent studies reporting new disease-specific prognostic markers, in addition to allogeneic-HSCT-related risk factors, which can be assessed at specific time points during treatment. We propose risk assessment as a dynamic process during treatment, incorporating both disease-related and transplant-related factors for the decision to proceed either to allogeneic HSCT or to apply a nontransplant strategy. We suggest that allogeneic HSCT might be favoured if the projected disease-free survival is expected to improve by at least 10% based on an individual's risk assessment. The approach requires initial disease risk assessment, identifying a sibling or unrelated donor soon after diagnosis and the incorporation of time-dependent risk factors, all within the context of an integrated therapeutic management approach