Plasticity in the Olfactory System: Lessons for the Neurobiology of Memory

We are rapidly advancing toward an understanding of the molecular events underlying odor transduction, mechanisms of spatiotemporal central odor processing, and neural correlates of olfactory perception and cognition. A thread running through each of these broad components that define olfaction appears to be their dynamic nature. How odors are processed, at both the behavioral and neural level, is heavily dependent on past experience, current environmental context, and internal state. The neural plasticity that allows this dynamic processing is expressed nearly ubiquitously in the olfactory pathway, from olfactory receptor neurons to the higher-order cortex, and includes mechanisms ranging from changes in membrane excitability to changes in synaptic efficacy to neurogenesis and apoptosis. This review will describe recent findings regarding plasticity in the mammalian olfactory system that are believed to have general relevance for understanding the neurobiology of memory.Yeshttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guideline

Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: a systematic review

Contains fulltext : 110141.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Loss of arm-hand performance due to a hemiparesis as a result of stroke or cerebral palsy (CP), leads to large problems in daily life of these patients. Assessment of arm-hand performance is important in both clinical practice and research. To gain more insight in e.g. effectiveness of common therapies for different patient populations with similar clinical characteristics, consensus regarding the choice and use of outcome measures is paramount. To guide this choice, an overview of available instruments is necessary. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, evaluate and categorize instruments, reported to be valid and reliable, assessing arm-hand performance at the ICF activity level in patients with stroke or cerebral palsy. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify articles containing instruments assessing arm-hand skilled performance in patients with stroke or cerebral palsy. Instruments were identified and divided into the categories capacity, perceived performance and actual performance. A second search was performed to obtain information on their content and psychometrics. RESULTS: Regarding capacity, perceived performance and actual performance, 18, 9 and 3 instruments were included respectively. Only 3 of all included instruments were used and tested in both patient populations. The content of the instruments differed widely regarding the ICF levels measured, assessment of the amount of use versus the quality of use, the inclusion of unimanual and/or bimanual tasks and the inclusion of basic and/or extended tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Although many instruments assess capacity and perceived performance, a dearth exists of instruments assessing actual performance. In addition, instruments appropriate for more than one patient population are sparse. For actual performance, new instruments have to be developed, with specific focus on the usability in different patient populations and the assessment of quality of use as well as amount of use. Also, consensus about the choice and use of instruments within and across populations is needed

Quadriceps tendinopathy - A forgotten pathology for physiotherapists? A systematic review of the current evidence-base

Background: The evidence-base surrounding the pathophysiology and management of specific tendinopathies has evolved over the past 20 years. Recent research examining lower limb tendinopathies has focussed primarily on Achilles and patellar tendon injuries. However, on further examination of the different types of patella/knee tendinopathies, confusion has arisen surrounding the diagnosis and management of patellar compared to quadriceps tendinopathy. Objectives: The purpose of this paper was to critically examine the evidence-base surrounding the diagnosis and management of quadriceps tendinopathy. Methods: A systematic literature search of published and unpublished literature databases was conducted to identify literature pertaining to quadriceps tendinopathy. Data from each paper were extracted to examine four key areas related to quadriceps tendinopathy: nomenclature, prevalence, assessment, and management. Results: Twelve studies satisfied the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. On analysis, little literature has been published solely informing clinicians on the pathology, diagnosis, or management of quadriceps tendinopathy. The terms patellar tendinopathy and jumper’s knee have been incorrectly used interchangeably with quadriceps tendinopathy. Activities such as repetitive squatting and prolonged knee flexion have been associated with the development of this tendinopathy. Sports such as football and volleyball have been cited as causative factors. Quadriceps tendinopathy’s principal diagnostic feature is pain on palpation of the quadriceps/patella interface, and resisted knee extension with the knee hyperflexed. There are no clear recommendations on how to specifically treat quadriceps tendinopathy. Conclusion: Quadriceps tendinopathy is less commn than patellar tendinopathy. Possibly as a result of this, little is known about how to assess and manage this particular knee tendinopathy. Further research is required to determine the optimal management strategy for patients diagnosed with quadriceps tendinopathy, acknowledging the biomechanical and anatomical difference of the quadriceps compared to the patellar tendon