Mutations that modify or exclude binding of the QA ubiquinone and carotenoid in the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Three single-site mutations have been introduced at positions close to the Q(A) ubiquinone in the reaction centre from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Two of these mutations, Ala M260 to Trp and Ala M248 to Trp, result in a reaction centre that does not support photosynthetic growth of the bacterium, and in which electron transfer to the Q(A) ubiquinone is abolished. In the reaction centre with an Afa to Trp mutation at the M260 residue, electron transfer from the primary donor to the acceptor bacteriopheophytin is not affected by the mutation, but electron transfer from the acceptor bacteriopheophytin to Q(A) is not observed. The most Likely basis for these effects is that the mutation produces a structural change that excludes binding of the Q(A) ubiquinone. A third mutation, Leu M215 to Trp, produces a reaction centre that has an impaired capacity for supporting photosynthetic growth. The mutation changes the nature of ubiquinone binding at the Q(A) site, and renders the site sensitive to quinone site inhibitors such as o-phenanthroline. Adopting a similar approach, in which a small residue located close to a cofactor is changed to a more bulky residue, we show that the reaction centre can be rendered carotenoid-less by the mutation Gly M71 to Leu

On the efficiency of energy transfer and the different pathways of electron transfer in mutant reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

The efficiency of energy transfer from the monomeric pigments to the primary donor was determined from 77 K steady-state fluorescence excitation spectra of three mutant reaction centers, YM210L, YM210F and LM160H / FM197H. For all three reaction centers this efficiency was not 100% and ranged between 55 and 70%. For the YM210L mutant it was shown using pump-probe spectroscopy with B band excitation at 798 nm that the excitations which are not transferred to P give rise to efficient charge separation. The results can be interpreted with a model in which excitation of the B absorbance band leads to direct formation of the radical pair state BA+HA- in addition to energy transfer to P. It is also possible that some P+BA- is formed from B*. In previous publications we have demonstrated the operation of such alternative pathways for transmembrane electron transfer in a YM210W mutant reaction center [van Brederode et al. (1996) The Reaction center of Photosynthetic Bacteria, pp 225-238; (1997a,b) Chem Phys Lett 268: 143-149; Biochemistry 36: 6855-6861]. The results presented here demonstrate that these alternative mechanisms are not peculiar to the YM210W reaction center

Bacteriopheophytin triplet state in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers

It is well established that photoexcitation of Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers (RC) with reduced quinone acceptors results in the formation of a triplet state localized on the primary electron donor P with a significant yield. The energy of this long-lived and therefore potentially damaging excited state is then efficiently quenched by energy transfer to the RC spheroidenone carotenoid, with its subsequent decay to the ground state by intersystem crossing. In this contribution, we present a detailed transient absorption study of triplet states in a set of mutated RCs characterized by different efficiencies of triplet formation that correlate with lifetimes of the initial charge-separated state P+HA- . On a microsecond time scale, two types of triplet state were detected: in addition to the well-known spheroidenone triplet state with a lifetime of ~4 μs, in some RCs we discovered a bacteriopheophytin triplet state with a lifetime of ~40 μs. As expected, the yield of the carotenoid triplet increased approximately linearly with the lifetime of P+HA-, reaching the value of 42 % for one of the mutants. However, surprisingly, the yield of the bacteriopheophytin triplet was the highest in RCs with the shortest P+HA- lifetime and the smallest yield of carotenoid triplet. For these the estimated yield of bacteriopheophytin triplet was comparable with the yield of the carotenoid triplet, reaching a value of ~7 %. Possible mechanisms of formation of the bacteriopheophytin triplet state are discussed.</p

Electronic pathway in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Chloroflexus aurantiacus

The reaction centers (RC) of Chloroflexus aurantiacus and Rhodobacter sphaeroidesH(M182)L mutant were investigated. Prediction for electron transfer (ET) at very low temperatures was also performed. To describe the kinetics of the C. aurantiacus RCs, the incoherent model of electron transfer was used. It was shown that the asymmetry in electronic coupling parameters must be included to explain the experiments. For the description of R. sphaeroidesH(M182)L mutant RCs, the coherent and incoherent models of electron transfer were used. These two models are discussed with regard to the observed electron transfer kinetics. It seems likely that the electron transfer asymmetry in R. sphaeroides RCs is caused mainly by the asymmetry in the free energy levels of L- and M-side cofactors. In the case of C. aurantiacus RCs, the unidirectionality of the charge separation can be caused mainly by the difference in the electronic coupling parameters in two branches