Pathophysiologic risk stratification of chronic heart failure: coexisting left atrial and right ventricular damage and the role of pulmonary circulation

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) the chronic increase of filling pressures progressively involves left atrium (LA), pulmonary circulation (PC) and right ventricle (RV), leading to worse outcome. Purpose we investigated the prognostic impact of either isolate LA impairment, RV dysfunction combined with pulmonary hypertension, or both, in HFrEF, using basic and advanced echocardiography. Methods 106 outpatients with HFrEF were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were primary lung disease, non-sinus rhythm, previous cardiac surgery, poor acoustic window. Clinical examination and basic echocardiography were performed. Speckle tracking analysis was used to measure peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) and a new marker of interaction between RV and PC: absolute free wall RV longitudinal strain(fwRVLS)/systolic pulmonary artery pressure(sPAP). Patients were followed for all-cause or cardiovascular death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Results of 84 eligible patients [mean age: 60.1 ± 11.5; 82% male, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) 28 ± 5%], 48 reached the combined endpoint. Population was divided into 3 groups: Group 1 [PALS≥15 and fwRVLS/sPAP ≤ 0.5]; Group 2 [PALS ≤ 15 and fwRVLS/sPAP ≤ 0.5 or PALS≥15 and fwRVLS/sPAP≥0.5]; Group 3 [PALS ≤ 15 and fwRVLS/sPAP≥0.5]. Mean follow-up was 3.5 ± 0.3years. The increasing severity groups were associated with higher LA volume index (LAVI), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) grades, lower LV EF, LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), PALS, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), sPAP, fwRVLS and global RVLS(p < 0.0001). Reduced PALS and fwRVLS/sPAP were independent predictors of NYHA > 2 at univariate and multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, LV EF, and of any events with adjusted Cox models (Table 1). Kaplan-Meier curves showed a clear divergence between the groups for the prediction of the combined endpoint (Fig.1), cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization. Conclusions the combination of LA and RV damage could represent the transition point to end-stage HF, with considerably worse prognosis. Its assessment with PALS and fwRVLS/sPAP could help risk stratification of HFrEF patients in order to provide early treatment. Table 1 Unadjusted hazard ratio [95% CI] Adjusted for GLS hazard ratio [95% CI] Adjusted for GLS, LAVi, TR, RVFAC hazard ratio [95% CI] Group 3 vs 1 10.61 [4.16-27.06], p < 0.0001 10.24 [3.49-30.02], p < 0.0001 9.54 [2.95-30.92], p = 0.0002 Group 3 vs 2 3.90 [1.92-7.93], p = 0.0002 3.82 [1.74-8.36], p = 0.0008 3.78 [1.66-8.61], p = 0.002 Group 2 vs 1 2.72 [1.03-7.20], p = 0.04 2.69 [0.99-7.25], p = 0.05 2.53 [0.84-7.58], p = 0.1 CI, confidence interval; EF, ejection fraction; GLS, global longitudinal strain;LAVI, left atrial volume index; MR, mitral regurgitation, TR, tricuspid regurgitation Abstract Figure. Fig.

Real-time PCR complements immunohistochemistry in the determination of HER-2/neu status in breast cancer

BACKGROUND: The clinical benefit of determining the status of HER-2/neu amplification in breast cancer patients is well accepted. Although immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the most frequently used method to assess the over-expression of HER-2 protein, fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) is recognized as the "gold standard" for the determining of HER-2/neu status. The greatest discordance between the two methods occurs among breast tumors that receive an indeterminate IHC score of 2+. More recently, a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay using the LightCycler(® )has been developed for quantifying HER-2/neu gene amplification. In this study, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of a commercially available LightCycler assay as it compares to FISH. To determine whether this assay provides an accurate alternative for the determination of HER-2/neu status, we focused primarily on tumors that were deemed indeterminate or borderline status by IHC. METHODS: Thirty-nine breast tumors receiving an IHC score of 2+ were evaluated by both FISH and LightCycler(® )technologies in order to determine whether quantitative real-time PCR provides an accurate alternative for the determination of HER-2/neu status. RESULTS: We found a high concordance (92%) between FISH and real-time PCR results. We also observed that 10% of these tumors were positive for gene amplification by both FISH and real-time PCR. CONCLUSION: The data show that the results obtained for the gene amplification of HER-2/neu by real-time PCR on the LightCycler(® )instrument is comparable to results obtained by FISH. These results therefore suggest that real-time PCR analysis, using the LightCycler(®), is a viable alternative to FISH for reassessing breast tumors which receive an IHC score of 2+, and that a combined IHC and real-time PCR approach for the determination of HER-2 status in breast cancer patients may be an effective and efficient strategy