906 research outputs found
Needs assessment of gossamer structures in communications platform end-of-life disposal
The use of a gossamer structure is considered in application to end-of-life disposal of communications platforms. A wide-ranging survey of end-of-life disposal techniques and strategies is presented for comparison against a gossamer structure prior to a down-selection of viable competing techniques; solar sailing, high and low-thrust propulsion, and electrodynamic tethers. A parametric comparison of the down-selection competing techniques is presented where it was found that exploiting solar radiation pressure on the gossamer structure was of limited value. In general terms, it was found that if a spacecraft propulsion system remains functioning at the end-of-life then this will likely provide the most efficient means of re-orbiting, especially when the propulsion system is only used to lower the orbit to a point where atmospheric drag will cause the orbit to decay within the required timeframe. Atmospheric drag augmentation was found to be of most benefit for end-of-life disposal when an entirely passive means is required, allowing the device to act as a âfail-safeâ, which if the spacecraft suffers a catastrophic failure would activate. The use of an atmospheric drag augmentation system is applicable to only low and medium mass spacecraft, or spacecraft that are unlikely to survive atmospheric re-entry, hence minimizing risk to human life
Between religion and empire: Sarah Selwynâs Aotearoa/New Zealand, Eton and Lichfield, England, c.1840s-1900
Taking the life of Sarah Selwyn (1809-1907), wife of the first Anglican bishop to New Zealand, the article plots the dynamics of geographic movement and varying communities of connection through which the mid-19thC imperial world was constituted. Negotiating empire and religion, mission and church, high church and evangelical, European and indigenous Maori and Melanesian, Sarahâs life illuminates the intricate networks underpinning â and at times undermining â colonial governance and religious authority. Sarah embarked for New Zealand in late 1841 at a high point of English mission and humanitarian idealism, arriving into a hierarchical and substantially Christianised majority Maori society. By the time she departed, in 1868, the colonial church and society, now European-dominated, had largely taken a position of support for a settler-led government taking up arms against ârebelliousâ Maori in a battle for sovereignty. In later life Sarah Selwyn became a reluctant narrator of her earlier âcolonialâ life while witnessing the emergence of a more secular empire from the close of Lichfield cathedral. The personal networks of empire are traced within wider metropolitan and colonial communities, the shifting ground from the idealistic 1840s to the more punitive later 19thC. The discussion traces the larger contexts through which a life was marked by the shifting ambiguities of what it was to be Christian in the colonial world: an agent of empire at the same time as a fierce critic of imperial policy, an upper class high church believer in the midst of evangelical missionaries, someone for whom life in New Zealand was both a profound disjuncture and a defining narrative.Ă partir de la biographie de Sarah Selwyn (1809-1907), femme du premier Ă©vĂȘque anglican de Nouvelle-ZĂ©lande, cet article Ă©tudie les forces dynamiques qui sous-tendent les dĂ©placements gĂ©ographiques et les communautĂ©s de relations variables grĂące auxquelles le monde impĂ©rial du milieu du XIXe siĂšcle a pu se constituer. TiraillĂ©e entre les forces en jeu (Empire et religion, mission et Ăglise, High Church et Ă©vangĂ©lisme, EuropĂ©ens et Maoris ou MĂ©lanĂ©siens), la vie de Sarah illustre les rĂ©seaux complexes qui soutiennent (et parfois contribuent Ă saper) lâautoritĂ© coloniale et lâautoritĂ© religieuse. Sarah sâĂ©tait embarquĂ©e pour la Nouvelle-ZĂ©lande Ă la fin 1841, Ă lâapogĂ©e dâun mouvement dâidĂ©alisme missionnaire et humanitaire anglais, pour arriver dans une sociĂ©tĂ© maorie hiĂ©rarchique et dans lâensemble christianisĂ©e. Au moment de son retour en Angleterre, en 1868, lâĂglise et la sociĂ©tĂ© coloniales, dĂ©sormais sous emprise europĂ©enne, sâĂ©taient ralliĂ©es Ă lâidĂ©e dâun gouvernement dirigĂ© par les colons qui allaient sâarmer contre les Maoris rebelles dans une lutte pour la souverainetĂ©. Plus tard dans sa vie, Sarah Selwyn sâest faite la narratrice rĂ©ticente de sa vie coloniale , au moment oĂč elle Ă©tait tĂ©moin de lâĂ©mergence dâun Empire plus sĂ©culier, dans lâenceinte de la cathĂ©drale Lichfield oĂč son mari Ă©tait Ă©vĂȘque. Lâauteure reconstitue ici les rĂ©seaux personnels de lâEmpire dans le cadre de communautĂ©s mĂ©tropolitaines et coloniales larges et changeantes, qui sont passĂ©es de lâidĂ©alisme des annĂ©es 1840 Ă un climat plus punitif Ă la fin du XIXe siĂšcle. Lâanalyse Ă©voque le contexte gĂ©nĂ©ral dans lequel une vie sâest vue marquĂ©e par les ambiguĂŻtĂ©s liĂ©es Ă lâaffirmation dâune identitĂ© chrĂ©tienne au sein du monde colonial, Sarah reprĂ©sentant lâEmpire tout en Ă©tant une critique acharnĂ©e de la politique impĂ©riale, Ă©tant une croyante de la haute sociĂ©tĂ© se rattachant Ă la High Church tout en vivant aux cĂŽtĂ©s de missionnaires Ă©vangĂ©liques, et Ă©tant une personne pour qui la vie en Nouvelle-ZĂ©lande reprĂ©sentait tout Ă la fois une profonde disjonction et un rĂ©cit dĂ©terminant
Land, Death and Dower in the Settler Empire: the Lost Cause of "The Widow's Third" in Nineteenth-Century New Zealand
Exploration of dower right or the 'widow's third' in 1840s-70s New Zealand provides an additional perspective on marriage and property history to the better known story of late 19thC married women's property reform. New Zealand practice broadly followed the curtailed dower history of the 1833 Dower Act (England) with further acceleration driven by the desire to rapidly disencumber land title in order to free property in land for easy sale and exchange. Several dower cases are traced, revealing the circumstances of widows in the social and economic fabric of colonial communities. Debates in the settler parliament in the 1870s reveal increasingly divergent set of understandings around land as property, about inheritance and a concern for the situation of women within, but not beyond, marriage
Beyond the Realm: The Loss of Culture as the Colonial Condition
Beyond the Realm: The Loss of Culture as the Colonial Conditio
"It always comes down to money" : recent changes in service provision to disabled children, young people and their families in Scotland
This study follows on previous research published by Scotlandâs Commissioner for Children and Young People which examined the use of eligibility criteria and assessment tools in services to disabled children and young people in Scottish local authorities (Lancaster 2012). The Stage One research also aimed to identify whether changing assessment procedures were affecting support to these young people. Based on local authority responses, the study found little evidence of tightening eligibility criteria, reduced levels of support or cutbacks in services. In 2013, the Commissionerâs Office funded further research to gather the views of voluntary sector providers and disabled children, young people and their families. The main aim of this study is to examine changes in the availability and accessibility of publicly funded services for these families over the past two years. This research covers local authority services, voluntary sector service providers, health services and professions allied to medicine. It includes children and young people aged 1-20 with a wide range of impairments including mental distress. The research is broadly based on a social model of disability while also taking account of the day-to-day implications of impairment and the significance of personal experience. The research used five different methods: âą An on-line survey of voluntary sector providers: 53 valid responses were returned âą 10 focus groups with parents, recruited through nine voluntary organisations and one local authority across Scotland. 56 parents/ carers took part âą Five focus groups with young disabled people (aged 12- 20), recruited through voluntary organisations mostly in central Scotland. Eighteen took part âą A one to one session with a young person (aged 17) who does not use speech âą Three case studies, conducted by telephone interview, with parents and a service provider. The study received ethical approval from the University of Strathclyde Ethics Committee. Careful attention was paid to ethical issues throughout. Three limitations can be identified in this research. The young peopleâs groups did not include participants with as wide a range of abilities as we had anticipated; the parents in the focus groups and case studies were largely self-selecting and, for the most part, the views of service providers are not represented. However, local authoritiesâ views were presented in the Stage One research. Fifty-three voluntary service organisations, providing publicly funded services to families with disabled children, responded to the survey. Their range of characteristics indicates that they represent a reasonable cross-section of voluntary sector providers in this field. Seventy-nine per cent offered support, advice and information to parents and many also provided short breaks, leisure activities, education support or support for self-advocacy. Almost all (87%) of respondents had experienced a cut in funding or a change in allocation procedures by public funders which reduced their ability to support families. In some cases, this had led to reduced provision or the closure of some projects. About a third spent less on staff training compared to two years ago, while 19% were employing less qualified or experienced staff. Nine respondents had increased charges for their services. Only 27% of respondents said they had not experienced a cut in funding. Service providers were ambivalent about the impact of changes on their services. While 72% of respondents said that disabled children and their families get as good a service from their organisation now as they did two years ago, responses to other questions in the survey suggest that 81% of them think that there has been some deterioration in their provision. More specifically, compared to two years ago, 48% were limiting the number of people using their services, 47% were unable to offer the same level of support to new service users while 45% could not provide the same level of one-to-one support to users generally. About a third of voluntary service providers reported families had to wait longer for their services while a quarter had seen users withdrawn from their services by local authorities in favour of other forms of support. Nevertheless, many voluntary service providers are having difficulty coping with the level of demand for their services as their own budgets are frozen or reduced. They see the erosion of local authority services by funding cuts creating more demand for the voluntary sector. Voluntary providers are finding ways to maintain their services by reconfiguring services, dropping ânicetiesâ such as providing lunches at carersâ meetings, taking a âbest valueâ approach and seeking out new funding sources. But there is concern that maintaining a good quality service does not solve the problem of waiting lists and excluded families. Some respondents see the current cutbacks by local authorities as undermining developments in policy and practice made in recent years. The right to assessment of need may be being undermined in some local authorities. Although only two respondents mentioned self-directed support (SDS) as a current source of their funding, a number of comments indicated an expectation that SDS will be used as a further means to cut budgets. There is evidence of growing unmet need which is not recorded. Service providers are concerned about families being excluded from any funding or support. 32% of respondents have already experienced changes in local authority eligibility criteria affecting access to their services while 23% were aware of changes planned for next year. Many reported that support was now only funded for the most complex cases, when children were at risk or families in crisis. Service providers fear that cuts in public funding for services, coupled with the recent changes to welfare benefits, will increase the stress and isolation experienced by families and disabled children and the consequent risk of marital and family breakdown. Fifty-six parents/family carers took part in 10 focus group held across Scotland. Between them, these 47 women and nine men were looking after 61 disabled children and young people aged between 2 and 20. Parents in every group reported withdrawals of, and reductions in, the support they receive from a range of services - local authority social work and education departments, FE colleges, voluntary organisations, health services and professions allied to medicine - over the last two years. Many families did not have a social worker, some had never had one. Several had experienced their social worker being withdrawn during the last two years. It seems parents were generally not consulted about this and most were unhappy about it. A few had tried unsuccessfully to get a social worker and been told they did not need one or could not have one due to cutbacks or staff shortages. With some notable exceptions, most parents who did have a social worker received a low level of support, often having to âchaseâ him/her. There was widespread satisfaction with the quality of short breaks services, with various schemes and units being praised. Parents generally wanted longer and/ or more frequent breaks. In some cases allocated hours had been withdrawn, reduced or failed to materialise. There was evidence of short breaks increasingly being used as a form of crisis intervention rather than a preventative service. Previous research has shown that disabled children and young people, like most young people, value opportunities to take part in social and recreational activities and make friends. A huge shortage of suitable social clubs and opportunities for young people was reported, the summer holidays being a particularly challenging time. Parents reported closure of holiday play schemes and a reduced number of hours for the young person to attend social clubs. There were concerns about staff not being trained to work with disabled children. In three areas, charges had been introduced for some social or play activities. Many positive comments were made about the schools the children and young people attended. However, parents also described reductions in the level of support and, in some cases, the quality of education available in some schools. In their view, reduced staffing levels were resulting in inadequate physical care, decreased learning support, less one-toone support including for some children assessed as needing it and a reluctance in some schools to develop Co-ordinated Support Plans. A minority of parents expressed concerns about the health and safety of their children. Three young people had been out of school for six or seven months without satisfactory alternative arrangements in place for their education. These situations were the culmination of complex and protracted difficulties but parents believed that insufficient training and experience among staff was a significant contributory factor. Parents reported reduced availability of occupational therapy, physiotherapy and speech and language therapy. Whereas therapists used to make routine âmaintenanceâ visits to children at school or at home, now they only came out in response to a specific problem or need. There were long waiting lists for appointments and for aids and equipment. Staff shortages were reported in CAMHS, a wheelchair and seating service and among nurses on childrenâs hospitals. A small number of parents reported an increase in services, sometimes due to an increase in their childâs challenging behaviour or following intervention by politicians they had contacted after experiencing long delays. Only a handful of parents had signed up for direct payments or (in three pilot areas) selfdirected support. While enjoying the flexibility and choice these brought, acting as an employer was felt to be demanding and âscary.â The wider introduction of SDS, from April 2014, was widely seen as a money-saving exercise. Many services had long waiting lists, with some families also facing delays in securing an assessment of their childâs or their own needs. Parents attributed the bulk of changes they were experiencing to financial cutbacks. Increased demand and higher numbers of children being diagnosed on the autistic spectrum were additional factors. There was little evidence of parents being consulted about reductions in service provision and, when they were, parents generally felt their views had not been taken on board. Changes were often made without re-assessment or review of the childâs or familyâs needs or, if re-assessments did take place, parents were not aware of it, although they and their children should be actively involved. Often parents were informed about changes by letter or telephone. While some professionals were singled out for high praise, many parents thought that staff, especially within local authorities, did not understand or listen to them. Most groups reported examples of insensitive comments or actions by professionals. Changes in service provision were often highly stressful for parents, sometimes causing or increasing anxiety, depression and relationship difficulties between partners. For children and young people, reductions in service provision variously led to disappointment, isolation, disrupted routines and, in a few cases, loss of skills. In some cases, stress caused by changes in support also affected siblings and grandparents. Although not directly asked about this, many parents raised the issue of poor information provision, adding that they generally found out about services from other parents and their own sleuthing efforts. Some had a view that, due to scarce resources, authorities withheld information or even gave out disinformation. There was great anxiety about the future, both in terms of further financial cutbacks and âwelfare reformâ and the perceived âvoidâ of support and opportunities for young people when they leave school. Five focus groups were held with a total of 18 young people plus a one-to-one interview with a participant who used little speech. The age range was 12-20. Fifteen males and four females took part: the reason for the gender disparity is not fully explained by the higher ratio of disabled males to females. The participants were recruited through voluntary sector organisations including three catering for young people with learning disabilities. The young peopleâs views about services differed in tone and focus from parentsâ accounts. Parents were generally responsible for arranging and liaising with services: young people had little direct involvement of that kind. They discussed their use of services within the wider context of their everyday lives. Most had experience of using a service whose input had come to an end. Some did not know the reason; others related it to their increasing age, changing needs or interests or other personal circumstances. A few reported that a service (such as speech and language therapy or physiotherapy) had been withdrawn which they felt they still needed. One young person identified financial constraints, shortage of social workers and greater priority being given to work with children as the reasons she had lost her social worker. In several cases, professionals had suggested finding a befriender for the young person but this had not materialised, apparently because alternative supports were identified or no befriender was currently available. The participants attended and enjoyed a wide range of social and recreational activities and had more to say about these than other services. There was some evidence that young people were offered more choices within these services than other forms of provision. At the same time, there were a couple of examples of individuals feeling less included. One young woman was not involved in swimming sessions with the social club she attended while another person was unable to meet up with friends outside school and service settings. The young people identified various services they used and staff they knew, generally expressing satisfaction with both. At the same time, there was often a sense of the young people being âprovidedâ with support, for example, through referral from other services. While they were involved in everyday choices about activities and entertainment, they seemed to have little say in more significant decisions about which services they used, why they used them or how they used them. With some exceptions, family members, particularly mothers, were identified as a key source of support in the everyday and an interface or mediator with services. Mothers were often described as the main decisionmakers when it came to using services and the young people expressed confidence in the decisions taken. Other participants reported that professionals made decisions about the support they should have: they did not mention being consulted. One view was that, while professionals seek young peopleâs views about topics which they (the professionals) considered important, they do not ask young people what matters to them. Loss of certain supports was an issue for some older participants no longer eligible for childrenâs services. Some also expressed wider concerns about the move to adult life, including insufficient careers advice, support to prepare for job interviews and difficulties learning to drive. One young person felt she was being discriminated against at college while another believed that young disabled people face discrimination in the labour market. Three case studies were carried out focusing on two boys and a girl aged 7, 10 and 15 respectively. The three young people all had complex needs including challenging behaviours. Their mothers each took part in a telephone interview and were invited to nominate a service provider whom we could also interview. This led to one voluntary service provider taking part. The parents gave detailed accounts of mostly unwelcome changes made to their service provision over the preceding two years. Although all had their own experiences, some common themes emerged. All had experienced withdrawal, reduction or breakdown of services in the last two years, in one case with no alternative being offered, in others, with what parents saw as inadequate or inappropriate alternatives offered. In two cases, the substitute services proposed did not match assessed need. One family had been offered three alternative services; one never materialised and the other two were not available. Two parents stated there had been no review or re-assessment of need prior to the loss of service or subsequently. All three had been involved in protracted negotiations (between one and two years) with the local authority to secure better support. While some professionals were seen as trying to be helpful, others were not. Each parent had a sense of âchanging goalpostsâ in the local authority, two believing they had been deliberately misinformed on some matters. In all three cases, there was a lack of transparency in the way decisions to change or reduce services were made. Two had reached Stage 31 in the complaints procedure. The absence of adequate support, coupled with the young peopleâs challenging behaviour, placed huge stress on families, including siblings. The voluntary service provider interviewed, whose input to the family had not changed, acknowledged the increased stress to the family and empathised with their frustration. Equally, she understood the limited resources available to the local authority and questioned its ability to provide personalised support to young people with complex needs. While some findings from this study coincide with local authoritiesâ accounts in the Stage One research, significant differences have also emerged. There is evidence of reductions in local authority budgets and services for disabled children, tightening eligibility criteria, support being removed without review or reassessment, and a lack of consultation with disabled children and young people. There is a real danger that children and young peopleâs entitlements under international conventions and UK and Scots law are being and will continue to be eroded, alongside the undermining of established good policy and practice. Reduced levels and quality of support and widespread deterioration in various aspects of service provision have led to less choice, long waiting lists and increased unmet need, with a shift away from preventative work to crisis intervention. There has been a small increase in charging for services, both in terms of increased rates and introduction of new charges. The uptake of direct payments and SDS by these parents, on behalf of their children, was low. There were mixed feelings about their benefits. The wider implementation of SDS from April 2014 was widely viewed as a money saving exercise. There was a widespread view that disabled children, young people and their families were being âdiscriminated against by servicesâ and âtreated like second class citizensâ. Next steps - proposed actions for public bodies Local authorities, health boards and voluntary organisations must ensure they are observing disabled childrenâs legislative rights and entitlements. Specifically: âą Under the Children (Scotland) Act 1995, local authorities must consult with children and young people, using accessible formats, and take their views into account when making decisions. Parents also have a right to be consulted. âą Under the same Act, local authorities must formally assess a childâs needs when a parent asks them to do so. âą If a child is assessed as needing certain named services, such as aids and equipment, practical help in the home, travel or recreational facilities, and is eligible for them, then under the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons (Scotland) Act 1972, the local authority must provide them. âą Local authorities should be aware that it is not good practice, and a previous judicial review2 shows it can be unlawful, to reduce or withdraw services from disabled children or young people without proper re-assessment or review of their needs. âą Under the Children (Scotland) Act 1995, public bodies should publish information about available services: it would be helpful if practitioners actively disseminated such information, explaining how it applies to individual children. Accessible materials should be also available for children and young people In relation to specific issues: âą Local authorities and health boards should ensure that budgets and staffing levels for disabled childrenâs services are sufficient to meet assessed need as well as the increasing number of service users and complexity of some cases. âą Waiting lists should be actively managed and regularly monitored, with families being kept informed of progress and offered advice and information as appropriate. âą Local authorities should inform disabled young people and their families about the benefits and the underlying principles of SDS and ensure practical assistance with the organisation and administration of direct payments is available. In relation to specific services: âą There is a need for far more social and recreational opportunities for disabled children and young people, including those with life-limiting conditions. Local area co-ordinators, who have a capacity building remit, could support mainstream organisations to include disabled children and young people. âą Professions allied to medicine (specifically, occupational theory, physiotherapy and speech and language therapy) should be more readily available to those disabled children and young people who would benefit from treatment on an on-going basis. âą Local authorities should have arrangements in place for emergency care of disabled children and young people w
Beyond the Realm: The Loss of Culture as the Colonial Condition
Beyond the Realm: The Loss of Culture as the Colonial Conditio
Making The Book of New Zealand Women
Interview with Charlotte MacDonald regarding her book: The Book of New Zealand Women, Ko Kui Ma te Kaupapa
Evidence of impact of the cancer care research centre's Developing Cancer Services: Patient and Carer Experiences Programme. Final Report
Student feedback to tailor the cardâą system for improving the immunization experience at school
Increasing the comfort of vaccine delivery at school is needed to improve the immunization experience for students. We created the CARDâą (CâComfort, AâAsk, RâRelax and DâDistract) system to address this clinical care gap. Originally designed for grade 7 students, this study examined the perceptions of grade 9 students of CARDâą. Grade 9 students who had experience with school-based immunizations, either as recipients or onlookers (n = 7; 100% females 14 years old) participated. Students answered preâpost surveys, reviewed CARDâą educational materials and participated in a semi-structured focus group discussion. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used as the framework for analysis of qualitative data. Participants reported positive perceptions of CARDâą educational materials and that CARDâą could fit into the school immunization process. CARDâą improved knowledge about effective coping interventions and was recommended for education of both nurses and students. The results provide preliminary evidence that CARDâą is acceptable and appropriate for implementation in grade 9 school-based immunizations
- âŠ