Microinvasive breast carcinoma: An analysis from ten Senonetwork Italia breast centres

Background and objectives: We studied a large series of ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (MIDC) an infrequent disease whose diagnosis and management are not well defined. Methods: 17,431 cases of breast carcinoma were treated between 2011 and 2016 by ten Italian Breast Units. Our analysis included diagnostic and clinic-pathological characteristics, surgical management, and the use of adjuvant therapies. Results: 15,091 cases (86.6%) were infiltrating carcinomas (IC), 2107 (12.1%) ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 233 (1.3%) MIDC. Age at diagnosis did not differ between DCIS and MIDC. MIDC were usually larger and expressed more frequently biologically aggressive features (higher Ki67 values, hormone receptor negativity and HER2/neu over-expression) (p < 0.01). Axillary lymph nodes were involved in 25 MIDC cases (12%), but >3 lymph nodes were involved in two cases only (1%). At multivariable analysis, only lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was associated with lymph node status (p < 0.01). Hormone therapy was prescribed in 388/1462 DCIS cases (26.5%), in 84/200 MIDC cases (42%), and in 11,086/14,188 IC cases (84.7%) (p < 0.01). Chemotherapy was administered in 28/190 MIDC cases (14.7%), and in 4080/11,548 IC cases (35.3%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This is one of the largest studies of MIDC reported in the literature. Approximately 10% of DCIS harbor one or more foci of MIDC, and the latter often expresses aggressive biological features. LVI is a predictor of axillary node involvement, but this is infrequent and usually limited. Conservative surgery is performed less often than in DCIS, and adjuvant chemotherapy is less frequently utilized compared to IC

Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group

The use of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is rapidly increasing. EUSOMA organised a workshop in Milan on 20–21st October 2008 to evaluate the evidence currently available on clinical value and indications for breast MRI. Twenty-three experts from the disciplines involved in breast disease management – including epidemiologists, geneticists, oncologists, radiologists, radiation oncologists, and surgeons – discussed the evidence for the use of this technology in plenary and focused sessions. This paper presents the consensus reached by this working group. General recommendations, technical requirements, methodology, and interpretation were firstly considered. For the following ten indications, an overview of the evidence, a list of recommendations, and a number of research issues were defined: staging before treatment planning; screening of high-risk women; evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy; patients with breast augmentation or reconstruction; occult primary breast cancer; breast cancer recurrence; nipple discharge; characterisation of equivocal findings at conventional imaging; inflammatory breast cancer; and male breast. The working group strongly suggests that all breast cancer specialists cooperate for an optimal clinical use of this emerging technology and for future research, focusing on patient outcome as primary end-point

Understanding Factors Associated With Psychomotor Subtypes of Delirium in Older Inpatients With Dementia

Objectives: Few studies have analyzed factors associated with delirium subtypes. In this study, we investigate factors associated with subtypes of delirium only in patients with dementia to provide insights on the possible prevention and treatments. Design: This is a cross-sectional study nested in the \u201cDelirium Day\u201d study, a nationwide Italian point-prevalence study. Setting and Participants: Older patients admitted to 205 acute and 92 rehabilitation hospital wards. Measures: Delirium was evaluated with the 4-AT and the motor subtypes with the Delirium Motor Subtype Scale. Dementia was defined by the presence of a documented diagnosis in the medical records and/or prescription of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors or memantine prior to admission. Results: Of the 1057 patients with dementia, 35% had delirium, with 25.6% hyperactive, 33.1% hypoactive, 34.5% mixed, and 6.7% nonmotor subtype. There were higher odds of having venous catheters in the hypoactive (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.18-2.81) and mixed type of delirium (OR 2.23, CI 1.43-3.46), whereas higher odds of urinary catheters in the hypoactive (OR 2.91, CI 1.92-4.39), hyperactive (OR 1.99, CI 1.23-3.21), and mixed types of delirium (OR 2.05, CI 1.36-3.07). We found higher odds of antipsychotics both in the hyperactive (OR 2.87, CI 1.81-4.54) and mixed subtype (OR 1.84, CI 1.24-2.75), whereas higher odds of antibiotics was present only in the mixed subtype (OR 1.91, CI 1.26-2.87). Conclusions and Implications: In patients with dementia, the mixed delirium subtype is the most prevalent followed by the hypoactive, hyperactive, and nonmotor subtype. Motor subtypes of delirium may be triggered by clinical factors, including the use of venous and urinary catheters, and the use of antipsychotics. Future studies are necessary to provide further insights on the possible pathophysiology of delirium in patients with dementia and to address the optimization of the management of potential risk factors