METEOROLOGICAL AND HYDROGRAPHICAL OBSERVATIONS MADE IN THE WESTERN PART OF THE NETHERLANDS EAST INDIAN ARCHIPELAGO

abstract not availableÂ

Communication in cross-cultural consultations in primary care in Europe: the case for improvement. The rationale for the RESTORE FP 7 project

The purpose of this paper is to substantiate the importance of research about barriers and levers to the implementation of supports for cross-cultural communication in primary care settings in Europe. After an overview of migrant health issues, with the focus on communication in cross-cultural consultations in primary care and the importance of language barriers, we highlight the fact that there are serious problems in routine practice that persist over time and across different European settings. Language and cultural barriers hamper communication in consultations between doctors and migrants, with a range of negative effects including poorer compliance and a greater propensity to access emergency services. It is well established that there is a need for skilled interpreters and for professionals who are culturally competent to address this problem. A range of professional guidelines and training initiatives exist that support the communication in cross-cultural consultations in primary care. However, these are commonly not implemented in daily practice. It is as yet unknown why professionals do not accept or implement these guidelines and interventions, or under what circumstances they would do so. A new study involving six European countries, RESTORE (REsearch into implementation STrategies to support patients of different ORigins and language background in a variety of European primary care settings), aims to address these gaps in knowledge. It uses a unique combination of a contemporary social theory, normalisation process theory (NPT) and participatory learning and action (PLA) research. This should enhance understanding of the levers and barriers to implementation, as well as providing stakeholders, with the opportunity to generate creative solutions to problems experienced with the implementation of such interventions

One-Particle Measurement of the Antiproton Magnetic Moment

\DeclareRobustCommand{\pbar}{\HepAntiParticle{p}{}{}\xspace} \DeclareRobustCommand{\p}{\HepParticle{p}{}{}\xspace} \DeclareRobustCommand{\mup}{$\mu_{p}${}{}\xspace} \DeclareRobustCommand{\mupbar}{\mu_{\pbar}{}{}\xspace} \DeclareRobustCommand{\muN}{$\mu_N${}{}\xspace For the first time a single trapped \pbar is used to measure the \pbar magnetic moment {\bm\mu}_{\pbar}. The moment {\bm\mu}_{\pbar} = \mu_{\pbar} {\bm S}/(\hbar/2) is given in terms of its spin ${\bm S}$ and the nuclear magneton (\muN) by \mu_{\pbar}/\mu_N = -2.792\,845 \pm 0.000\,012. The 4.4 parts per million (ppm) uncertainty is 680 times smaller than previously realized. Comparing to the proton moment measured using the same method and trap electrodes gives \mu_{\pbar}/\mu_p = -1.000\,000 \pm 0.000\,005 to 5 ppm, for a proton moment ${\bm{\mu}}_{p} = \mu_{p} {\bm S}/(\hbar/2)$, consistent with the prediction of the CPT theorem.Comment: 4 pages, 4 figures. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1201.303

'Unbearable suffering': a qualitative study on the perspectives of patients who request assistance in dying

BACKGROUND One of the objectives of medicine is to relieve patients' suffering. As a consequence, it is important to understand patients' perspectives of suffering and their ability to cope. However, there is poor insight into what determines their suffering and their ability to bear it. PURPOSE To explore the constituent elements of suffering of patients who explicitly request euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (EAS) and to better understand unbearable suffering from the patients' perspective. PATIENTS AND METHODS A qualitative study using in-depth face-to-face interviews was conducted with 31 patients who had requested EAS. The grounded theory approach was used to analyse the data. RESULTS Medical, psycho-emotional, socio-environmental and existential themes contributed to suffering. Especially fatigue, pain, decline, negative feelings, loss of self, fear of future suffering, dependency, loss of autonomy, being worn out, being a burden, loneliness, loss of all that makes life worth living, hopelessness, pointlessness and being tired of living were constituent elements of unbearable suffering. Only patients with a psychiatric (co)diagnosis suffered unbearably all the time. CONCLUSIONS Unbearable suffering is the outcome of an intensive process that originates in the symptoms of illness and/or ageing. According to patients, hopelessness is an essential element of unbearable suffering. Medical and social elements may cause suffering, but especially when accompanied by psycho-emotional and existential problems suffering will become 'unbearable'. Personality characteristics and biographical aspects greatly influence the burden of suffering. Unbearable suffering can only be understood in the continuum of the patients' perspectives of the past, the present and expectations of the future.This study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society (grant number KUN2007-03736)

Capturing Patient Value in an Economic Evaluation

OBJECTIVE: Economic evaluations predominantly use generic outcomes, such as EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), to assess the health status. However, because of the generic nature, they are less suitable to capture the quality of life of patients with specific conditions. Given the transition to patient-centered (remote) care delivery, this study aims to evaluate the possibility to use disease-specific measures in a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA).METHODS: A real-life cohort from Maasstad Hospital (2020-2021) in the Netherlands, with 772 Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients, was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of electronic consultations (e-consultations) compared with face-to-face consultations. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) based on the generic EQ-5D was compared with ICER's based on RA specific measures; Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). To compare the cost-effectiveness of these different measures, HAQ-DI and RAID were expressed in QALYs via estimated conversion equations.CONCLUSIONS: The conventional ICER (e.g. EQ-5D) indicates that e-consultations are cost-effective with cost savings of - €161k per QALY gained for a prevalent RA cohort treated in a secondary trainee hospital. RA specific measures show similar results, with ICER's of - €163k per HAQ-DI(QALY) and - €223k per RAID(QALY) gained. RA specific measures capture patient-relevant domains and offer the opportunity to improve the assessment and treatment of the disease impact.DISCUSSION: Disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) offer a promising alternative for traditional measures in economic evaluations, capturing patient-relevant domains more comprehensively. As PROMs are increasingly applied in clinical practice, the next step entails modelling of a RA patient-wide conversion equation to implement PROMs in economic evaluations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p

Multi-Band Limiter Value to Production Chain and Its Processing Limitation

Architecture & Allied Art