11,429 research outputs found
Routine administration of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and needs assessment instruments to improve psychological outcome: a systematic review
Background. Routine administration of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and needs assessment instruments has been advocated as part of clinical care to aid the recognition of psychosocial problems, to inform clinical decision making, to monitor therapeutic response and to facilitate patient-doctor communication. However, their adoption is not without cost and the benefit of their use is unclear. Method. A systematic review was conducted. We sought experimental studies that examined the addition of routinely administered measures of HRQoL to care in both psychiatric and non-psychiatric settings. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycLIT and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (to 2000). Data were extracted independently and a narrative synthesis of results was presented. Results. Nine randomized and quasi-randomized studies conducted in non-psychiatric settings were found. All the instruments used included an assessment of mental well-being, with specific questions relating to depression and anxiety. The routine feedback of these instruments had little impact on the recognition of mental disorders or on longer term psychosocial functioning. While clinicians welcomed the information these instruments imparted, their results were rarely incorporated into routine clinical decision making. No studies were found that examined the value of routine assessment and feedback of HRQoL or patient needs in specialist psychiatric care settings. Conclusions. Routine HRQoL measurement is a costly exercise and there is no robust evidence to suggest that it is of benefit in improving psychosocial outcomes of patients managed in non-psychiatric settings. Major policy initiatives to increase the routine collection and use of outcome measures in psychiatric settings are unevaluated
Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety : systematic review
Objectives To examine the effect of routinely administered psychiatric questionnaires on the recognition, management, and outcome of psychiatric disorders in non-psychiatric settings. Data sources Embase, Medline, PsycLIT, Cinahl, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register,and hand searches of key journals. Methods A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of the administration and routine feedback of psychiatric screening and outcome questionnaires to clinicians in non-psychiatric settings. narrative overview of key design features and end points, together with a random effects quantitative synthesis of comparable studies. Main outcome measures Recognition of psychiatric disorders after feedback of questionnaire results; interventions for psychiatric disorders and outcome of psychiatric disorders. Results Nine randomised studies were identified that examined the use of common psychiatric instruments in primary care and general hospital settings. Studies compared the effect of the administration of these instruments followed by the feedback of the results to clinicians, with administration with no feedback. Meta-analytic pooling was possible for four of these studies (2457 participants), which measured the effect of feedback on the recognition of depressive disorders. Routine administration and feedback of scores for all patients (irrespective of score) did not increase the overall rate of recognition of mental disorders such as anxiety and depression (relative risk of detection of depression by clinician after feedback 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.09). Two studies showed that routine administration followed by selective feedback for only high scores increased the rate of recognition of depression (relative risk of detection of depression after feedback 2.64, 1.62 to 4.31). This increased recognition, however, did not translate into an increased rate of intervention. Overall, studies of routine administration of psychiatric measures did not show an effect on patient outcome. Conclusions The routine measurement of outcome is a costly exercise. Little evidence shows that it is of benefit in improving psychosocial outcomes of those with psychiatric disorder managed in non-psychiatric settings
Extragalactic and galactic gamma-rays and neutrinos from annihilating dark matter
We describe cosmic gamma-ray and neutrino signals of dark matter
annihilation, explaining how the complementarity of these signals provides
additional information that, if observable, can enlighten the particle nature
of dark matter. This is discussed in the context of exploiting the separate
galactic and extragalactic components of the signal, using the spherical halo
model distribution of dark matter. We motivate the discussion with
supersymmetric extensions of the standard model of particle physics. We
consider the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) where both neutrinos
and gamma-rays are produced from annihilations. We also consider a gauged B-L,
baryon number minus lepton number, extension of the MSSM, where annihilation
can be purely to heavy right-handed neutrinos. We compare the galactic and
extragalactic components of these signals, and conclude that it is not yet
clear which may dominate when looking out of the galactic plane. To answer this
question, we must have an understanding of the contribution of halo
substructure to the annihilation signals. We find that different theories with
indistinguishable gamma-ray signals can be distinguished in the neutrino
signal. Gamma-ray annihilation signals are difficult to observe from the
galactic center, due to abundant astrophysical sources; but annihilation
neutrinos from there would not be so hidden, if they can be observed over the
atmospheric neutrinos produced by cosmic rays.Comment: 15 pages, 11 figure
Does responsibility affect the public valuation of health care interventions? A relative valuation approach to health care safety
This article is available open access through the publisher’s website at the link below. Copyright © 2012, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and
Outcomes Research (ISPOR).Objective - Health services often spend more on safety interventions than seems cost-effective. This study investigates whether the public value safety-related health care improvements more highly than the same improvements in contexts where the health care system is not responsible.
Method - An online survey was conducted to elicit the relative importance placed on preventing harms caused by 1) health care (hospital-acquired infections, drug administration errors, injuries to health care staff), 2) individuals (personal lifestyle choices, sports-related injuries), and 3) nature (genetic disorders). Direct valuations were obtained from members of the public by using a person trade-off or “matching” method. Participants were asked to choose between two preventative interventions of equal cost and equal health benefit per person for the same number of people, but differing in causation. If participants indicated a preference, their strength of preference was measured by using person trade-off.
Results - Responses were obtained from 1030 people, reflecting the sociodemographic mix of the UK population. Participants valued interventions preventing hospital-acquired infections (1.31) more highly than genetic disorders (1.0), although drug errors were valued similarly to genetic disorders (1.07), and interventions to prevent injury to health care staff were given less weight than genetic disorders (0.71). Less weight was also given to interventions related to lifestyle (0.65) and sports injuries (0.41).
Conclusion - Our results suggest that people do not attach a simple fixed premium to “safety-related” interventions but that preferences depend more subtly on context. The use of the results of such public preference surveys to directly inform policy would therefore be premature.Brunel University
A simple solution of the critical Kauffman model with connectivity one
The Kauffman model is a model of genetic computation that highlights the
importance of criticality at the border of order and chaos. But our
understanding of its behavior is incomplete, and much of what we do know relies
on intricate arguments. We give a simple proof that the number of attractors
for the critical Kauffman model with connectivity one grows faster than
previously believed. Our approach relies on a link between the critical
dynamics and number theory.Comment: 2 page
Predicting patient-reported stroke outcomes: a validation of the six simple variable prognostic model.
BACKGROUND: Case-mix represents the range of disease severity and baseline characteristics that may be the cause of variation in outcomes between individuals and populations. Adjustment for case-mix is therefore important to allow meaningful comparison of healthcare outcomes. The best available case-mix adjustment model for stroke (the Six Simple Variable [SSV] model) was developed to adjust the hard endpoints of independent survival, survival and alive and living at home. There is increasing interest in the measurement of patient-reported outcomes through self-completed questionnaires, though there are currently no robust adjustment models for any such outcome. We aimed to determine whether the SSV prognostic model derived to predict 6-month post-stroke independent survival has wider utility in case-mix adjustment of a patient-reported functional outcome measure, the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO), collected by post 6 months after stroke onset. METHODS: We examined data from 176 patients admitted following an acute stroke and recruited into a prospective cohort study in three participating acute hospitals in Yorkshire, UK. Patients in receipt of palliative care or with transient ischaemic attack were excluded. Using the beta coefficients from the published SSV model to predict independent survival, individual probabilities of 'good' outcome as measured with the dichotomised SIPSO collected by post 6 months after stroke onset were calculated. The ability of the SSV case-mix adjustment model to discriminate patients with 'good' over 'poor' outcome was assessed through calculation of C statistics. Correct predictions were visualised with calibration plots. RESULTS: The C statistics for the SSV model to predict the physical and social subscales of the SIPSO outcome measure were 0.73 (95% CI 0.65-0.79) and 0.66 (0.58-0.82), respectively. Inclusion of patients who died prior to follow-up and ascribing them a score of 0 improved the discrimination (0.76 [0.70-0.82] and 0.70 [0.64-0.76], respectively). Calibration plots demonstrated a tendency to over-optimistic predictions, although confidence limits were wide. CONCLUSIONS: The SSV model predicts adequately the physical component of the SIPSO patient-reported outcome measure and may be useful to adjust this outcome for case-mix following stroke in survivors to follow-up. This could be of benefit in observational studies, stratified randomisation for trials, and in comparison of between-institution clinical trials. Further exploration of the generalizability of the model to adjust other patient-reported stroke outcomes may be warranted
Electrochemical Tuning of the Dielectric Function of Au Nanoparticles
The tunable dielectric response of Au nanoparticles under electrochemical bias can be interpreted in terms of changes in the surface charge density, surface damping, and the near-surface volume fraction of the nanoparticles that experience a modified dielectric function, as well as changes in the index of refraction of the surrounding electrolyte medium. Using experimental bias-dependent extinction measurements, we derive a potential-dependent dielectric function for Au nanoparticles that accounts for changes in the physical properties contributing to the optical extinction
- …