4 research outputs found

    Ultrasound - guided access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Entering desired calyx with appropriate entry site and angle

    Get PDF
    Objectives: To evaluate the success of ultrasonography directed renal access in entering the target calyx from proper entry site and in the direction of renal pelvis during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Materials and Methods: PCNL cases who were operated on by one fellow from May- June 2014 were included in this study. A vertically placed ultrasound probe on the patient flank in prone position was used to identify the preselected target calyx. Needle was advanced through needle holder and fluoroscopy was used to document the entered calyx, site and angle of entry. Results: Successful entering to the target calyx was achieved in 43 cases (91). Successful entry with appropriate entry site and angle was observed in 34 cases (72). Reasons for failure were minimal hydronephrosis, upper pole access and high lying kidneys. Conclusions: Although it is feasible to access a preselected calyx by ultrasonography guidance during PCNL, but entry to the calyx from the appropriate site and direction is another problem and needs more experience. In cases of minimal hydronephrosis, superior pole access or high lying kidneys, ultrasonography is less successful and should be used with care

    Limitations of spinal anesthesia for patient and surgeon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy

    Get PDF
    Purpose: To evaluate the intraoperative pain score of patients who undergo percutaneous nephrolithotomy under spinal anesthesia and to evaluate surgeons' and patients' convenience with this type of anesthesia. Materials and Methods: PCNL cases who were performed by two endourology fellows under spinal anesthesia during June to July 2014 were included. Spinal anesthesia was performed using injection of 0.25mg/kg bupivacaine 0.5 in the intrathecal space. All procedures were performed with the patient in the prone position. Stone access was made by using fluoroscopic guidance, and the tract was dilated using a single-stage technique. Visual analogue pain score was used to assess patients' pain during operation, immediately after, and 2 hours later. Results: 50 patients were enrolled during the study period. Visual analogue pain score of 10 and 8 were observed in 5 and three patients respectively. In two patients the operation was terminated because of patient anxiety and pain. In another patient a second access was not obtained to remove a staghorn stone because of patient's agitation. Gross agitation was observed in six patients. Apart from flank pain, intraoperative pain was felt in the flank, scapula, abdomen and/or chest. Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia does not provide enough analgesia for the patient in a limited frequency of percutaneous nephrolithotomy operations. We could not find statistically significant predictors of insufficient analgesia based on patients' demographics, stone characteristics or access location. © 2017, Urology and Nephrology Research Centre
    corecore