Comparison of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive impairment in HAART-treated patients

Background: Neurocognitive impairment (NCI) and HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) remain prevalent despite HAART. We examined sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and correct classification rate (CCR) of screening tools for the detection of NCI and HAND in HAART treated patients. Methods: We examined 101 unselected HAART-treated patients. Patients were administered the self-reported three questions (EACS Guidelines), the International HIV-Dementia Scale (IHDS), the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), and a comprehensive 6-domain (17-test) neuropsychological (NP) battery (120 minutes) that included, among others, the Digit Symbol (DS), the Trail Making Modalities (TM), and the Grooved Pegboard (GP) tests. NCI was defined according to the AAN criteria. HAND was diagnosed after exclusion of confounding conditions. Results: Our cohort was relatively healthy (mean CD4 count: 575 cells/mm3, undetectable plasma HIV RNA 85%). Prevalence of NCI and HAND were 39.6% (40 of 101) and 30.7% (31 of 101), respectively. Mean scores of IHDS (9.9 vs 10.8; p<0.001) and MMSE (26.8 vs 28.2; p=0.004) differed significantly between impaired and unimpaired patients, while mean three-questions scores (8.0 vs 7.0; p=0.23) did not. The three questions showed also poor sensitivity for the detection of both NCI (20%) and HAND (22%). The IHDS showed fairly good sensitivity (55%) and NPV (73.5%). Adding to the IHDS some easy to administer NP tests, i.e. TM, DS, and GP, resulted in an increase in sensitivity and NPV for the detection of NCI (table). Similar results were obtained regarding the detection of HAND (not shown in table). Conclusions: Both NCI and HAND are still very prevalent in HAART-treated patients. Among screening tools the self-reported three question show poor sensitivity. The IHDS performed better in terms of sensitivity, PPV, and NPV. Combinations of easy-to-administer NP tests with the IHDS resulted in increased sensitivity and NPV. Combining IHDS with one or two simple NP test may represent an improvement in the screening approach to the detection of both NCI and HAND

Acute rhabdomyolysis and delayed pericardial effusion in an Italian patient with Ebola virus disease : a case report

Background: During the 2013-2016 West Africa Ebola virus disease (EVD) epidemic, some EVD patients, mostly health care workers, were evacuated to Europe and the USA. Case presentation: In May 2015, a 37-year old male nurse contracted Ebola virus disease in Sierra Leone. After Ebola virus detection in plasma, he was medically-evacuated to Italy. At admission, rhabdomyolysis was clinically and laboratory-diagnosed and was treated with aggressive hydration, oral favipiravir and intravenous investigational monoclonal antibodies against Ebola virus. The recovery clinical phase was complicated by a febrile thrombocytopenic syndrome with pericardial effusion treated with corticosteroids for 10days and indomethacin for 2months. No evidence of recurrence is reported. Conclusions: A febrile thrombocytopenic syndrome with pericardial effusion during the recovery phase of EVD appears to be uncommon. Clinical improvement with corticosteroid treatment suggests that an immune-mediated mechanism contributed to the pericardial effusion

Interaction Between Diabetes Mellitus and Platelet Reactivity in Determining Long-Term Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We investigated the interaction between DM and high platelet reactivity (HPR) in determining long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We enrolled 500 patients who were divided based on the presence of DM and HPR. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse clinical events (MACE) at 5 years. Patients with both DM and HPR showed the highest estimates of MACE (37.9%, log-rank p < 0.001), all-cause death (15.5%, log-rank p = 0.022), and non-fatal myocardial infarction (25.9%, log-rank p < 0.001). At Cox proportional hazard analysis, the coexistence of DM and HPR was an independent predictor of MACE (HR 3.46, 95% CI 1.67-6.06, p < 0.001). Among patients with stable CAD undergoing elective PCI and treated with aspirin and clopidogrel, the combination of DM and HPR identifies a cohort of patients with the highest risk of MACE at 5 years

Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease and Platelet Reactivity on Clinical Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

We investigated the interaction between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and high platelet reactivity (HPR) in determining long-term clinical outcomes following elective PCI for stable coronary artery disease (CAD). A total of 500 patients treated with aspirin and clopidogrel were divided based on the presence of CKD (defined as glomerular filtration rate of &lt; 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) and HPR (defined as a P2Y12 reaction unit value ≥ 240 at VerifyNow assay). Primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse clinical events (MACE) at 5 years. Patients with both CKD and HPR showed the highest estimates of MACE (25.6%, p = 0.005), all-cause death (17.9%, p = 0.004), and cardiac death (7.7%, p = 0.004). The combination of CKD and HPR was an independent predictor of MACE (HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.46–6.68, p = 0.003). In conclusion, the combination of CKD and HPR identifies a cohort of patients with the highest risk of MACE at 5 years

Prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with diabetes mellitus: from antithrombotic therapies to new-generation glucose-lowering drugs

Diabetes mellitus is an important risk factor for a first cardiovascular event and for worse outcomes after a cardiovascular event has occurred. This situation might be caused, at least in part, by the prothrombotic status observed in patients with diabetes. Therefore, contemporary antithrombotic strategies, including more potent agents or drug combinations, might provide greater clinical benefit in patients with diabetes than in those without diabetes. In this Consensus Statement, our Working Group explores the mechanisms of platelet and coagulation activity, the current debate on antiplatelet therapy in primary cardiovascular disease prevention, and the benefit of various antithrombotic approaches in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. While acknowledging that current data are often derived from underpowered, observational studies or subgroup analyses of larger trials, we propose antithrombotic strategies for patients with diabetes in various cardiovascular settings (primary prevention, stable coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndromes, ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack, peripheral artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and venous thromboembolism). Finally, we summarize the improvements in cardiovascular outcomes observed with the latest glucose-lowering drugs, and on the basis of the available evidence, we expand and integrate current guideline recommendations on antithrombotic strategies in patients with diabetes for both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Platelet function and long-term antiplatelet therapy in women: is there a gender-specificity? A 'state-of-the-art' paper

Although the female gender is generally less represented in cardiovascular studies, observational and randomized investigations suggest that-compared with men-women may obtain different benefits from antiplatelet therapy. Multiple factors, including hormonal mechanisms and differences in platelet biology, might contribute to such apparent gender peculiarities. The thrombotic and bleeding risks, as well as outcomes after a cardiovascular event, appear to differ between genders, partly in relation to differences in age, comorbidities and body size. Equally, the benefits of antiplatelet therapy may differ in women compared with men in different vascular beds, during primary or secondary prevention and according to the type of an antiplatelet agent used. This document is an attempt to bring together current evidence, clinical practices and gaps of knowledge on gender-specific platelet function and antiplatelet therapy. On the basis of the available data, we provide suggestions on current indications of antiplatelet therapy for cardiovascular prevention in women with different clinical features; no strong recommendation may be given because the available data derive from observational studies or post hoc/subgroup analyses of randomized studies without systematic adjustments for baseline risk profiles. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved

Platelet function and long-term antiplatelet therapy in women: is there a gender-specificity? A 'state-of-the-art' paper

Although the female gender is generally less represented in cardiovascular studies, observational and randomized investigations suggest that\u2014 compared with men\u2014women may obtain different benefits from antiplatelet therapy. Multiple factors, including hormonal mechanisms and differences in platelet biology, might contribute to such apparent gender peculiarities. The thrombotic and bleeding risks, aswell as outcomes after a cardiovascular event, appear to differ between genders, partly in relation to differences in age, comorbidities and body size. Equally, the benefits of antiplatelet therapy may differ in women compared with men in different vascular beds, during primary or secondary prevention and according to the type of an antiplatelet agent used. This document is an attempt to bring together current evidence, clinical practices and gaps of knowledge on gender-specific platelet function and antiplatelet therapy.Onthe basis of the available data,we provide suggestions on current indications of antiplatelet therapy for cardiovascular prevention in women with different clinical features; no strong recommendation may be given because the available data derive fromobservational studies or post hoc/subgroup analyses of randomized studies without systematic adjustments for baseline risk profiles