11,675 research outputs found

    Strong coupling constant from bottomonium fine structure

    Get PDF
    From a fit to the experimental data on the bbˉb\bar{b} fine structure, the two-loop coupling constant is extracted. For the 1P state the fitted value is αs(μ1)=0.33±0.01(exp)±0.02(th)\alpha_s(\mu_1) = 0.33 \pm 0.01(exp)\pm 0.02 (th) at the scale μ1=1.8±0.1\mu_1 = 1.8 \pm 0.1 GeV, which corresponds to the QCD constant Λ(4)(2−loop)=338±30\Lambda^{(4)}(2-loop) = 338 \pm 30 MeV (n_f = 4) and αs(MZ)=0.119±0.002.Forthe2Pstatethevalue\alpha_s(M_Z) = 0.119 \pm 0.002. For the 2P state the value \alpha_s(\mu_2) = 0.40 \pm 0.02(exp)\pm 0.02(th)atthescale at the scale \mu_2 = 1.02 \pm 0.2GeVisextracted,whichissignificantlylargerthaninthepreviousanalysisofFulcher(1991)andHalzen(1993),butabout30smallerthanthevaluegivenbystandardperturbationtheory.Thisvalue GeV is extracted, which is significantly larger than in the previous analysis of Fulcher (1991) and Halzen (1993), but about 30% smaller than the value given by standard perturbation theory. This value \alpha_s(1.0) \approx 0.40canbeobtainedintheframeworkofthebackgroundperturbationtheory,thusdemonstratingthefreezingof can be obtained in the framework of the background perturbation theory, thus demonstrating the freezing of \alpha_s.Therelativisticcorrectionsto. The relativistic corrections to \alpha_s$ are found to be about 15%.Comment: 18 pages LaTe

    The leptonic widths of high ψ\psi-resonances in unitary coupled-channel model

    Full text link
    The leptonic widths of high ψ\psi-resonances are calculated in a coupled-channel model with unitary inelasticity, where analytical expressions for mixing angles between (n+1)\,^3S_1 and n\,^3D_1 states and probabilities ZiZ_i of the ccˉc\bar c component are derived. Since these factors depend on energy (mass), different values of mixing angles θ(ψ(4040))=27.7∘\theta(\psi(4040))=27.7^\circ and θ(ψ(4160))=29.5∘\theta(\psi(4160))=29.5^\circ, Z1 (ψ(4040))=0.76Z_1\,(\psi(4040))=0.76, and Z2 (ψ(4160))=0.62Z_2\,(\psi(4160))=0.62 are obtained. It gives the leptonic widths Γee(ψ(4040))=Z1 1.17=0.89\Gamma_{ee}(\psi(4040))=Z_1\, 1.17=0.89~keV, Γee(ψ(4160))=Z2 0.76=0.47\Gamma_{ee}(\psi(4160))=Z_2\, 0.76=0.47~keV in good agreement with experiment. For ψ(4415)\psi(4415) the leptonic width Γee(ψ(4415))= 0.55\Gamma_{ee}(\psi(4415))=~0.55~keV is calculated, while for the missing resonance ψ(4510)\psi(4510) we predict M(ψ(4500))=(4515±5)M(\psi(4500))=(4515\pm 5)~MeV and Γee(ψ(4510))≅0.50\Gamma_{ee}(\psi(4510)) \cong 0.50~keV.Comment: 10 pages, 6 references corrected, some new material adde

    Higher excitations of the DD and DsD_s mesons

    Get PDF
    The masses of higher D(nL)D(nL) and Ds(nL)D_s(nL) excitations are shown to decrease due to the string contribution, originating from the rotation of the QCD string itself: it lowers the masses by 45 MeV for L=2(n=1)L=2 (n=1) and by 65 MeV for L=3(n=1)L=3 (n=1). An additional decrease ∼100\sim 100 MeV takes place if the current mass of the light (strange) quark is used in a relativistic model. For Ds(1 3D3)D_s(1\,{}^3D_3) and Ds(2P1H)D_s(2P_1^H) the calculated masses agree with the experimental values for Ds(2860)D_s(2860) and Ds(3040)D_s(3040), and the masses of D(2 1S0)D(2\,{}^1S_0), D(2 3S1)D(2\,{}^3S_1), D(1 3D3)D(1\,{}^3D_3), and D(1D2)D(1D_2) are in agreement with the new BaBar data. For the yet undiscovered resonances we predict the masses M(D(2 3P2))=2965M(D(2\,{}^3P_2))=2965 MeV, M(D(2 3P0))=2880M(D(2\,{}^3P_0))=2880 MeV, M(D(1 3F4))=3030M(D(1\,{}^3F_4))=3030 MeV, and M(Ds(1 3F2))=3090M(D_s(1\,{}^3F_2))=3090 MeV. We show that for L=2,3L=2,3 the states with jq=l+1/2j_q=l+1/2 and jq=l−1/2j_q=l-1/2 (J=lJ=l) are almost completely unmixed (ϕ≃−1∘\phi\simeq -1^\circ), which implies that the mixing angles θ\theta between the states with S=1 and S=0 (J=LJ=L) are θ≈40∘\theta\approx 40^\circ for L=2 and ≈42∘\approx 42^\circ for L=3.Comment: 22 pages, no figures, 4 tables Two references and corresponding discussion adde

    Comparison of relativistic bound-state calculations in Front-Form and Instant-Form Dynamics

    Get PDF
    Using the Wick-Cutkosky model and an extended version (massive exchange) of it, we have calculated the bound states in a quantum field theoretical approach. In the light-front formalism we have calculated the bound-state mass spectrum and wave functions. Using the Terent'ev transformation we can write down an approximation for the angular dependence of the wave function. After calculating the bound-state spectra we characterized all states found. Similarly, we have calculated the bound-state spectrum and wave functions in the instant-form formalism. We compare the spectra found in both forms of dynamics in the ladder approximation and show that in both forms of dynamics the O(4) symmetry is broken.Comment: 22 pages Latex, 7 figures, style file amssymb use

    Pauli-Potential and Green Function Monte-Carlo Method for Many-Fermion Systems

    Get PDF
    The time evolution of a many-fermion system can be described by a Green's function corresponding to an effective potential, which takes anti-symmetrization of the wave function into account, called the Pauli-potential. We show that this idea can be combined with the Green's Function Monte Carlo method to accurately simulate a system of many non-relativistic fermions. The method is illustrated by the example of systems of several (2-9) fermions in a square well.Comment: 12 pages, LaTeX, 4 figure

    The heavy-quark pole masses in the Hamiltonian approach

    Full text link
    From the fact that the nonperturbative self-energy contribution CSEC_{\rm SE} to the heavy meson mass is small: CSE(bbˉ)=0C_{\rm SE}(b\bar{b})=0; CSE(ccˉ)≅−40C_{\rm SE}(c\bar{c})\cong -40 MeV \cite{ref.01}, strong restrictions on the pole masses mbm_b and mcm_c are obtained. The analysis of the bbˉb\bar{b} and the ccˉc\bar{c} spectra with the use of relativistic (string) Hamiltonian gives mbm_b(2-loop)=4.78±0.05=4.78\pm 0.05 GeV and mcm_c(2-loop)=1.39±0.06=1.39 \pm 0.06 GeV which correspond to the MSˉ\bar{\rm MS} running mass mˉb(mˉb)=4.19±0.04\bar{m}_b(\bar{m}_b)=4.19\pm 0.04 GeV and mˉc(mˉc)=1.10±0.05\bar{m}_c(\bar{m}_c)=1.10\pm 0.05 GeV. The masses ωc\omega_c and ωb\omega_b, which define the heavy quarkonia spin structure, are shown to be by ∼200\sim 200 MeV larger than the pole ones.Comment: 18 pages, no figures, 8 table

    Light meson radial Regge trajectories

    Get PDF
    A new physical mechanism is suggested to explain the universal depletion of high meson excitations. It takes into account the appearance of holes inside the string world sheet due to qqˉq\bar{q} pair creation when the length of the string exceeds the critical value R1≃1.4R_1 \simeq 1.4 fm. It is argued that a delicate balance between large NcN_c loop suppression and a favorable gain in the action, produced by holes, creates a new metastable (predecay) stage with a renormalized string tension which now depends on the separation r. This results in smaller values of the slope of the radial Regge trajectories, in good agreement with the analysis of experimental data in [Ref.3]Comment: 25 pages, 1 figur

    The ccˉc\bar c interaction above threshold and the radiative decay X(3872)→J/ψγX(3872)\rightarrow J/\psi\gamma

    Full text link
    Radiative decays of X(3872)X(3872) are studied in single-channel approximation (SCA) and in the coupled-channel (CC) approach, where the decay channels DDˉ∗D\bar D^* are described with the string breaking mechanism. In SCA the transition rate Γ~2=Γ(2 3P1→ψγ)=71.8\tilde{\Gamma}_2=\Gamma(2\,{}^3P_1 \rightarrow \psi\gamma)=71.8~keV and large Γ~1=Γ(2 3P1→J/ψγ)=85.4\tilde{\Gamma}_1=\Gamma(2\,{}^3P_1\rightarrow J/\psi\gamma)=85.4~keV are obtained, giving for their ratio the value Rψγ~=Γ~2Γ~1=0.84\tilde{R_{\psi\gamma}}=\frac{\tilde{\Gamma}_2}{\tilde{\Gamma}_1}=0.84. In the CC approach three factors are shown to be equally important. First, the admixture of the 1 3P11\,{}^3P_1 component in the normalized wave function of X(3872)X(3872) due to the CC effects. Its weight cX(ER)=0.200±0.015c_{\rm X}(E_{\rm R})=0.200\pm 0.015 is calculated. Secondly, the use of the multipole function g(r)g(r) instead of rr in the overlap integrals, determining the partial widths. Thirdly, the choice of the gluon-exchange interaction for X(3872)X(3872), as well as for other states above threshold. If for X(3872)X(3872) the gluon-exchange potential is taken the same as for low-lying charmonium states, then in the CC approach Γ1=Γ(X(3872)→J/ψγ)∼3\Gamma_1= \Gamma(X(3872)\rightarrow J/\psi\gamma) \sim 3~keV is very small, giving the large ratio Rψγ=B(X(3872)→ψ(2S)γ)B(X(3872)→J/ψγ)≫1.0R_{\psi\gamma}=\frac{\mathcal{B}(X(3872)\rightarrow \psi(2S)\gamma)}{\mathcal{B}(X(3872)\rightarrow J/\psi\gamma)}\gg 1.0. Arguments are presented why the gluon-exchange interaction may be suppressed for X(3872)X(3872) and in this case Γ1=42.7\Gamma_1=42.7~keV, Γ2=70.5\Gamma_2= 70.5~keV, and Rψγ=1.65R_{\psi\gamma}=1.65 are predicted for the minimal value cX(min)=0.185c_{\rm X}({\rm min})=0.185, while for the maximal value cX=0.215c_{\rm X}=0.215 we obtained Γ1=30.8\Gamma_1=30.8~keV, Γ2=73.2\Gamma_2=73.2~keV, and Rψγ=2.38R_{\psi\gamma}=2.38, which agrees with the LHCb data.Comment: 12 pages, no figure

    The Hyperfine Splittings in Bottomonium and the Bq(q=n,s,c)B_q (q=n,s,c) Mesons

    Get PDF
    A universal description of the hyperfine splittings (HFS) in bottomonium and the Bq(q=n,s,c)B_q (q=n,s,c) mesons is obtained with a universal strong coupling constant αs(μ)=0.305(2)\alpha_s(\mu)=0.305(2) in a spin-spin potential. Other characteristics are calculated within the Field Correlator Method, taking the freezing value of the strong coupling independent of nfn_f. The HFS M(B∗)−M(B)=45.3(3)M(B^*)- M(B)=45.3(3) MeV, M(Bs∗)−M(Bs)=46.5(3)M(B_s^*) - M(B_s)=46.5(3) MeV are obtained in full agreement with experiment both for nf=3n_f=3 and nf=4n_f=4. In bottomonium, M(Υ(9460))−M(ηb)=70.0(4)M(\Upsilon(9460))- M(\eta_b)=70.0(4) MeV for nf=5n_f=5 agrees with the BaBar data, while a smaller HFS, equal to 64(1) MeV, is obtained for nf=4n_f=4. We predict HFS M(Υ(2S))−M(ηb(2S))=36(1)M(\Upsilon(2S))-M(\eta_b(2S))=36(1) MeV, M(Υ(3S))−M(η(3S))=27(1)M(\Upsilon(3S))- M(\eta(3S))=27(1) MeV, and M(Bc∗)−M(Bc)=57.5(10)M(B_c^*) - M(B_c)= 57.5(10) MeV, which gives M(Bc∗)=6334(1)M(B_c^*)=6334(1) MeV, M(Bc(21S0))=6865(5)M(B_c(2 {}^1S_0))=6865(5) MeV, and M(Bc∗(2S3S1))=6901(5)M(B_c^*(2S {}^3S_1))=6901(5) MeV.Comment: 5 pages revtex
    • …
    corecore