Morphological suitability for endovascular repair, non-intervention rates, and operative mortality in women and men assessed for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: systematic reviews with meta-analysis

Background Prognosis for women with abdominal aortic aneurysm might be worse than the prognosis for men. We aimed to systematically quantify the differences in outcomes between men and women being assessed for repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm using data from study periods after the year 2000. Methods In these systematic reviews and meta-analysis, we identified studies (randomised, cohort, or cross-sectional) by searching MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and grey literature published between Jan 1, 2005, and Sept 2, 2016, for two systematic reviews and Jan 1, 2009, and Sept 2, 2016, for one systematic review. Studies were included if they were of both men and women, with data presented for each sex separately, with abdominal aortic aneurysms being assessed for aneurysm repair by either endovascular repair (EVAR) or open repair. We conducted three reviews based on whether studies reported the proportion morphologically suitable (within manufacturers' instructions for use) for EVAR (EVAR suitability review), non-intervention rates (non-intervention review), and 30-day mortality (operative mortality review) after intact aneurysm repair. Studies had to include at least 20 women (for the EVAR suitability review), 20 women (for the non-intervention review), and 50 women (for the operative mortality review). Studies were excluded if they were review articles, editorials, letters, or case reports. For the operative review, studies were also excluded if they only provided hazard ratios or only reported in-hospital mortality. We assessed the quality of the studies using the Newcastle–Ottawa scoring system, and contacted authors for the provision of additional data if needed. We combined results across studies by random-effects meta-analysis. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42016043227. Findings Five studies assessed the morphological eligibility for EVAR (1507 men, 400 women). The overall pooled proportion of women eligible (34%) for EVAR was lower than it was in men (54%; odds ratio [OR] 0·44, 95% CI 0·32–0·62). Four single-centre studies reported non-intervention rates (1365 men, 247 women). The overall pooled non-intervention rates were higher in women (34%) than men (19%; OR 2·27, 95% CI 1·21–4·23). The review of 30-day mortality included nine studies (52 018 men, 11 076 women). The overall pooled estimate for EVAR was higher in women (2·3%) than in men (1·4%; OR 1·67, 95% CI 1·38–2·04). The overall estimate for open repair also was higher in women (5·4%) than in men (2·8%; OR 1·76, 95% CI 1·35–2·30). Interpretation Compared with men, a smaller proportion of women are eligible for EVAR, a higher proportion of women are not offered intervention, and operative mortality is much higher in women for both EVAR and open repair. The management of abdominal aortic aneurysm in women needs improvement.This project was funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme (project number 14/179/01). Work done at the University of Cambridge was additionally funded by the Medical Research Council (MR/L003120/1), the British Heart Foundation (RG/13/13/30194), and the National Institute for Health Research; Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre)

Role of Simulation in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Training: A Preliminary Study

Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) requires a high-level of technical-competency to avoid device-related complications. Virtual reality simulation-based training (SBT) may offer an alternative method of psychomotor skill acquisition; however, its role in EVAR training is undefined. This study aimed to: a) benchmark competency levels using EVAR SBT, and b) investigate the impact of supervised SBT on trainee performance. Methods: EVAR procedure-related metrics were benchmarked by six experienced consultants using a Simbionix Angiomentor EVAR simulator. Sixteen vascular surgical trainees performing a comparable EVAR before and after structured SBT (>4 teaching sessions) were assessed utilising a modified Likert-scale score. These were benchmarked for comparison against the standard set by the consultant body. Results: Median procedural-time for consultants was 43.5 min (IQR 7.5). A significant improvement in trainee procedural-time following SBT was observed (median procedural time 77 min [IQR 20.75] vs. 56 min [IQR: 7.00], p < .0001). The mean (SD) trainee Likert score pre- and post-SBT improved (16.6 [SD 1.455] vs. 28.63 [SD 2.986], p < .0001). Fewer endoleaks were observed (p = .0063) and trainees chose an appropriately sized device more often after SBT. Conclusion: This study suggests that EVAR-SBT should be considered as an adjunct to standard psychomotor skill teaching techniques for EVAR within the vascular surgery training curricula

Pre-operative Functional Cardiovascular Reserve Is Associated with Acute Kidney Injury after Intervention

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after endovascular intervention, associated with poor short and long-term outcomes. However, the mechanisms underlying AKI development remain poorly understood. The impact of pre-existing cardiovascular disease and low cardiovascular reserve (CVR) in AKI is unclear; it remains unknown whether AKI is primarily related to pre-existing comorbidity or to procedural parameters. The association between CVR and AKI after EVAR was therefore assessed. METHODS: This is a case control study. From a database of 484 patients, 292 undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in two tertiary centres were included. Of these, 73 patients who had developed AKI after EVAR were case matched, based on pre-operative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; within 5 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and age, with patients who had not developed AKI. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was used to assess CVR using the anaerobic threshold (AT). Development of AKI was defined using the Kidney Disease Improving Outcomes (KDIGO) guidance. Associations between CVR (based on AT levels) and AKI development were then analysed. RESULTS: Pre-operative AT levels were significantly different between those who did and did not develop AKI (12.1±2.9 SD vs. 14.8±3.0 mL/min/kg, p < .001). In multivariate analysis, a higher level of AT (per 1 mL/min/kg) was associated with a lower odds ratio (OR) of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.82, p < .001), relative to AKI development. A pre-operative AT level of < 11 mL/min/kg was associated with post-operative AKI development in adjusted analysis, with an OR of 7.8 (95% CI, 3.75-16.51, p < .001). The area under the curve (receiver operating characteristic) for AT as a predictor of post-operative AKI was 0.81 (standard error, 0.06, 95% CI, 0.69-0.93, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Poor CVR was strongly associated with the development of AKI. This provides pathophysiological insights into the mechanisms underlying AKI

Meta-analysis of the current prevalence of screen-detected abdominal aortic aneurysm in women.

BACKGROUND: Although women represent an increasing proportion of those presenting with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture, the current prevalence of AAA in women is unknown. The contemporary population prevalence of screen-detected AAA in women was investigated by both age and smoking status. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken of studies screening for AAA, including over 1000 women, aged at least 60 years, done since the year 2000. Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases until 13 January 2016. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scoring system. RESULTS: Eight studies were identified, including only three based on population registers. The largest studies were based on self-purchase of screening. Altogether 1 537 633 women were screened. Overall AAA prevalence rates were very heterogeneous, ranging from 0·37 to 1·53 per cent: pooled prevalence 0·74 (95 per cent c.i. 0·53 to 1·03) per cent. The pooled prevalence increased with both age (more than 1 per cent for women aged over 70 years) and smoking (more than 1 per cent for ever smokers and over 2 per cent in current smokers). CONCLUSION: The current population prevalence of screen-detected AAA in older women is subject to wide demographic variation. However, in ever smokers and those over 70 years of age, the prevalence is over 1 per cent

Impact of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on quality of life.

Background Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is known to reduce AAA‐related mortality; however, the psychological impact of population AAA screening is unclear. The aim was to assess the impact of AAA diagnosis on quality of life (QoL) using data from an established AAA screening programme. Methods Mental and physical QoL scores for men diagnosed with AAA through participation in the English and Welsh AAA screening programmes were compared with no‐AAA controls. Participants were identified through the United Kingdom Aneurysm Growth Study (UKAGS), a nationwide prospective cohort study of men with an AAA of less than 55 mm diagnosed through voluntary participation in screening. The UKAGS participants completed QoL questionnaires at the time of screening and annually thereafter. Results A transient reduction in mental QoL scores was observed following the diagnosis of AAA, returning to baseline levels after 12 months. Physical QoL remained consistently lower in the AAA cohort. Participants thought about their AAA and the AAA growth progressively less 12 months after the initial screening diagnosis. AAA growth rate had no influence over QoL parameters. Discussion This study suggests that screening for AAA does reduce mental QoL; however, this effect is transient (less than 12 months). Men diagnosed with AAA have a consistently worse physical QoL compared with controls

Meta-analysis of Outcomes Following Aneurysm Repair in Patients with Synchronous Intra-abdominal Malignancy.

OBJECTIVES: The management of concomitant intra-abdominal malignancy (IAM) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) remains a challenge, even though malignancy is common in an elderly population. By means of systematic review and meta-analysis, the aim was to investigate outcomes in patients undergoing open (OAR) or endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) that have a concomitant malignancy. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed (Medline and EMBASE databases) to identify all series reporting outcomes of AAA repair (OAR or EVAR) in patients with concomitant IAM. Meta-analysis was applied to assess mortality and major morbidity at 30 days and long term. RESULTS: The literature review identified 36 series (543 patients) and the majority (18 series) reported on patients with colorectal malignancy and AAA. Mean weighted mortality for OAR at 30 days was 11% (95% CI: 6.6% to 17.9%); none of the EVAR patients died peri-operatively. The weighted 30-day major complication rate for EVAR was 20.4% (10.0-37.4%) and for OAR it was 15.4% (7.0-30.8%). Most patients had their AAA and malignancy treated non-simultaneously (56.6%, 95% CI, 42.1-70.1%). In the EVAR cohort, three patients (4.6%) died at last follow-up (range 24-64 months). In the OAR cohort 23 (10.6%) had died at last follow up (range from 4 to 73 months). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, OAR was associated with significant peri-operative mortality in patients with an IAM. EVAR should be the first-line modality of AAA repair. The majority of patients were not treated simultaneously for the two pathologies, but further investigation is necessary to define the optimal timing for each procedure and malignancy

Patients with Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm are at Significant Risk of Cardiovascular Events and this Risk is not Addressed Sufficiently

BACKGROUND: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are at significant risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. Recent implementation of AAA-screening means thousands of patients are now diagnosed with small-AAA; however, CV risk factors are not always addressed. This study aimed at assessing and quantifying the CV characteristics of patients with small AAA following the introduction of screening programmes. METHODS: CV profiles of 384 men with a small AAA (<55 mm diameter) were assessed through the United Kingdom Aneurysm Growth Study (UKAGS), a nationwide prospective cohort study of men with small AAA. A prospective local cohort of an additional 142 patients with small AAA with available blood pressure (BP) and lipid profiles was also included and followed-up for 1 year. RESULTS: In the UKAGS population, 54% were current and 30% ex-smokers; 58% were hypertensive and 54% hypercholesterolaemic. In the local group, 54% were current and 40% were ex-smokers, and 94% were hypertensive. Patients were not more likely to receive CV medication after entering AAA surveillance in either group. All local patients were clustered "high-risk" for future CV events based on the Framingham score (mean 21.8%, 95% CI 20.0-23.6), JBS-2 (16.3%, 14.7-17.9) and ASSIGN (25.2%, 22.7-27.7). No change was seen in systolic BP levels between baseline and 1 year (140.9 mmHg vs. 142.5 mmHg, p=.435). A rise was seen in cholesterol (4.0 mmol-4.2 mmol, p<.0001) values at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that patients with small AAA are at significant risk for developing CV events and this is not currently addressed, which is evident by the "high-risk" CV risk profiles of these patients despite being in AAA surveillance. Design and implementation of a CV risk reduction programme tailored for this population is necessary

Opportunity for cardiovascular risk factor reduction in AAA surveillance programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular mortality in patients with small AAA

Aim: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has dramatically reduced the rate of AAA-rupture, yet cardiovascular mortality remains a major cause of death in this patient group. A diagnosis of AAA is a powerful marker of cardiovascular risk, yet only 12.4% of patients use statins. The aim of this study was to assess the cardiovascular risk in patients with small AAA. Methods: Standard PRISMA guidelines were followed. A meta-regression analysis was performed for cardiovascular mortality in small AAA patients and a qualitative synthesis of the prevalence of concurrent cardiovascular diseases. Results: A total 2323 patients with small AAA were identified (median follow-up 5 years). A total of 335 cardiovascular deaths occurred, 37 of which from AAA-rupture, showing a cardiovascular mortality risk of 3.00% per year in small AAA patients (R2 = 0.902, p < 0.001). The prevalence of ischaemic heart disease (44.9%), myocardial infarction (26.8%), heart failure (4.4%) and cerebrovascular disease (14.0%) were high in this patient group. Discussion: There is high cardiovascular risk in patients with small AAA, yet many may not be taking advantage of optimal cardiovascular risk factor modification. The diagnosis of a small AAA should be seen as a red-flag sign, triggering lifestyle change and pharmaco-vigilance against cardiovascular risk factors

Genome wide association studies: identifying the genes that determine the risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm

Genome wide association studies: identifying the genes that determine the risk of abdominal aortic aneurys

Shared Genetic Risk Factors of Intracranial, Abdominal, and Thoracic Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial aneurysms (IAs), abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), and thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) all have a familial predisposition. Given that aneurysm types are known to co-occur, we hypothesized that there may be shared genetic risk factors for IAs, AAAs, and TAAs. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a mega-analysis of 1000 Genomes Project-imputed genome-wide association study (GWAS) data of 4 previously published aneurysm cohorts: 2 IA cohorts (in total 1516 cases, 4305 controls), 1 AAA cohort (818 cases, 3004 controls), and 1 TAA cohort (760 cases, 2212 controls), and observed associations of 4 known IA, AAA, and/or TAA risk loci (9p21, 18q11, 15q21, and 2q33) with consistent effect directions in all 4 cohorts. We calculated polygenic scores based on IA-, AAA-, and TAA-associated SNPs and tested these scores for association to case-control status in the other aneurysm cohorts; this revealed no shared polygenic effects. Similarly, linkage disequilibrium-score regression analyses did not show significant correlations between any pair of aneurysm subtypes. Last, we evaluated the evidence for 14 previously published aneurysm risk single-nucleotide polymorphisms through collaboration in extended aneurysm cohorts, with a total of 6548 cases and 16 843 controls (IA) and 4391 cases and 37 904 controls (AAA), and found nominally significant associations for IA risk locus 18q11 near RBBP8 to AAA (odds ratio [OR]=1.11; P=4.1×10(-5)) and for TAA risk locus 15q21 near FBN1 to AAA (OR=1.07; P=1.1×10(-3)). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was no evidence for polygenic overlap between IAs, AAAs, and TAAs, we found nominally significant effects of two established risk loci for IAs and TAAs in AAAs. These two loci will require further replication