Prevalence and clinical impact of Streptococcus pneumoniae nasopharyngeal carriage in solid organ transplant recipients

Background: S. pneumoniae is the leading cause of community-acquired pneumonia in the solid organ transplant recipient (SOTR); nevertheless, the prevalence of colonization and of the colonizing/infecting serotypes has not been studied in this population. In this context, the aim of the present study was to describe the rate, characteristics, and clinical impact of S. pneumoniae nasopharyngeal carriage. Methods: A prospective observational cohort of Solid Organ Transplant recipients (SOTR) was held at the University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain with the aim to evaluate the S. pneumoniae colonization and the serotype prevalence in SOTR. Two different pharyngeal swabs samples from 500 patients were included in two different seasonal periods winter and spring/summer. Optochin and bile solubility tests were performed for the isolation of thew strains. Antimicrobial susceptibility studies (MICs, mg/l) of levofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, penicillin, amoxicillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, erythromycin, azithromycin and vancomycin for each isolate were determined by E-test strips. Capsular typing was done by sequential multiplex PCR reactions. A multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors potentially associated with pneumococcal nasopharyngeal carriage and disease was performed. Results: Twenty-six (5.6%) and fifteen (3.2%) patients were colonized in winter and spring/summer periods, respectively. Colonized SOT recipients compared to non-colonized patients were more frequently men (79.5% vs. 63.1%, P < 0.05) and cohabitated regularly with children (59% vs. 32.2%, P < 0.001). The most prevalent serotype in both studied periods was 35B. Forty-five percent of total isolates were included in the pneumococcal vaccine PPV23. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and macrolides were the less active antibiotics. Three patients had non- bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia, and two of them died. Conclusions: Pneumococcal colonization in SOTR is low with the most colonizing serotypes not included in the pneumococcal vaccines.Pfizer, 2014 ASPIRE Awards in Vaccine Research in Europe (Pfizer Reference # WI191483)Plan Nacional de I + D + i 2013–2016 , Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad REIPI RD16/0016/0009 Fondo Regional de Desarrollo Europeo "Una forma de alcanzar Europa", Programa operativo Crecimiento inteligente 2014–2020

Acidic Urine pH and Clinical Outcome of Lower Urinary Tract Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated with Ciprofloxacin and Fosfomycin

Different factors, including antimicrobial resistance, may diminish the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy, challenging the management of post-transplant urinary tract infection (UTI). The association of acidic urine pH with microbiological and clinical outcomes was evaluated after fosfomycin or ciprofloxacin therapy in 184 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with UTI episodes by Escherichia coli (N = 115) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (N = 69). Initial urine pH, antimicrobial therapy, and clinical and microbiological outcomes, and one- and six-month follow-up were assessed. Fosfomycin was prescribed in 88 (76.5%) E. coli and 46 (66.7%) K. pneumoniae UTI episodes in the total cohort. When the urine pH ≤ 6, fosfomycin was prescribed in 60 (52.2%) E. coli and 29 (42.0%) K. pneumoniae. Initial urine pH ≤ 6 in E. coli UTI was associated with symptomatic episodes (8/60 vs. 0/55, p = 0.04) at one-month follow-up, with a similar trend in those patients receiving fosfomycin (7/47 vs. 0/41, p = 0.09). Acidic urine pH was not associated with microbiological or clinical cure in K. pneumoniae UTI. At pH 5, the ciprofloxacin MIC90 increased from 8 to >8 mg/L in E. coli and from 4 to >8 mg/L in K. pneumoniae. At pH 5, the fosfomycin MIC90 decreased from 8 to 4 mg/L in E. coli and from 512 to 128 mg/L in K. pneumoniae. Acidic urine is not associated with the microbiological efficacy of fosfomycin and ciprofloxacin in KTRs with UTI, but it is associated with symptomatic UTI episodes at one-month follow-up in E. coli episodes.This study has been funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III, through the projects PI17/01405 and PI20/01255, by the Subdirección General de Evaluación y Fomento de la Investigación, Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, US-1381501 US/JUNTA/FEDER, UE, by the Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, and the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI, RD16/0016/0009) and co-funded by the European Union.Peer reviewe

Modern venomics – Current insights, novel methods and future perspectives in biological and applied animal venom research

Venoms have evolved &gt;100 times in all major animal groups, and their components, known as toxins, have been fine-tuned over millions of years into highly effective biochemical weapons. There are many outstanding questions on the evolution of toxin arsenals, such as how venom genes originate, how venom contributes to the fitness of venomous species, and which modifications at the genomic, transcriptomic, and protein level drive their evolution. These questions have received particularly little attention outside of snakes, cone snails, spiders, and scorpions. Venom compounds have further become a source of inspiration for translational research using their diverse bioactivities for various applications. We highlight here recent advances and new strategies in modern venomics and discuss how recent technological innovations and multi-omic methods dramatically improve research on venomous animals. The study of genomes and their modifications through CRISPR and knockdown technologies will increase our understanding of how toxins evolve and which functions they have in the different ontogenetic stages during the development of venomous animals. Mass spectrometry imaging combined with spatial transcriptomics, in situ hybridization techniques, and modern computer tomography gives us further insights into the spatial distribution of toxins in the venom system and the function of the venom apparatus. All these evolutionary and biological insights contribute to more efficiently identify venom compounds, which can then be synthesized or produced in adapted expression systems to test their bioactivity. Finally, we critically discuss recent agrochemical, pharmaceutical, therapeutic, and diagnostic (so-called translational) aspects of venoms from which humans benefit

In vitro and in vivo activities of linezolid alone and combined with vancomycin and imipenem against Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides

The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo efficacies of linezolid (35 mg/kg/5 h), vancomycin (60 mg/kg/5 h), imipenem (30 mg/kg/5 h), linezolid+imipenem, linezolid+vancomycin and vancomycin+imipenem against two clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides using time–kill curves and the murine peritonitis model. Time–kill curves were performed over 24 h. For the murine peritonitis model, peritonitis was induced by the intraperitoneal inoculation of 108 CFU/ml of each bacterial strain. Four hours later (0 h), the mice were randomly assigned to a control group or to therapeutic groups receiving subcutaneous treatment for 25 h. Bacterial counts in peritoneal fluid, bacteraemia and mortality rates were determined. The time–kill curves showed that the addition of linezolid to imipenem yielded synergistic results after 24 h. The addition of linezolid decreased vancomycin activity. In the animal model, vancomycin and linezolid monotherapies produced comparable bacterial decreases in mice infected with each strain but linezolid achieved higher rates of blood sterilisation. Linezolid tested either in monotherapy or in combination showed similar efficacy against both strains in terms of bacterial killing, number of negative blood cultures and survival. Linezolid and vancomycin were moderately bactericidal and similar in efficacy against glycopeptide-intermediate or -resistant S. aureus. Linezolid combinations, as effective as linezolid tested alone, could be considered as alternative options for the treatment of glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) infections

Clinical and Ecological Impact of an Educational Program to Optimize Antibiotic Treatments in Nursing Homes (PROA-SENIOR): A Cluster, Randomized, Controlled Trial and Interrupted Time-Series Analysis

[Background] Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are recommended in nursing homes (NHs), although data are limited. We aimed to determine the clinical and ecological impact of an ASP for NHs.[Methods] We performed a cluster, randomized, controlled trial and a before–after study with interrupted time-series analyses in 14 NHs for 30 consecutive months from July 2018 to December 2020 in Andalusia, Spain. Seven facilities implemented an ASP with a bundle of 5 educational measures (general ASP) and 7 added 1-to-1 educational interviews (experimental ASP). The primary outcome was the overall use of antimicrobials, calculated monthly as defined daily doses (DDD) per 1000 resident days (DRD).[Results] The total mean antimicrobial consumption decreased by 31.2% (−16.72 DRD; P = .045) with respect to the preintervention period; the overall use of quinolones and amoxicillin–clavulanic acid dropped by 52.2% (P = .001) and 42.5% (P = .006), respectively; and the overall prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) decreased from 24.7% to 17.4% (P = .012). During the intervention period, 12.5 educational interviews per doctor were performed in the experimental ASP group; no differences were found in the total mean antimicrobial use between groups (−14.62 DRD; P = .25). Two unexpected coronavirus disease 2019 waves affected the centers increasing the overall mean use of antimicrobials by 40% (51.56 DRD; P < .0001).[Conclusions] This study suggests that an ASP for NHs appears to be associated with a decrease in total consumption of antimicrobials and prevalence of MDROs. This trial did not find benefits associated with educational interviews, probably due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.[Clinical Trials Registration] NCT03543605.Peer reviewe

Efficacy of dual carbapenem treatment in a murine sepsis model of infection due to carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii

Objectives: To evaluate the in vivo efficacy of a dual carbapenem combination containing imipenem plus meropenem against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii producing carbapenemases OXA-23 or OXA-58.Methods: An experimental model of peritonitis using C57BL/6J female mice was developed and the minimum lethal doses were calculated for infections due to OXA-23 or OXA-58 producers of A. baumannii clinical isolates. The efficacies of the carbapenems in monotherapy and in combination were tested.Results: Meropenem was better than imipenem in mice infected with either of the carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAb) strains. The combination of meropenem plus imipenem significantly improved the clearance of CRAbs from spleen compared with non-treated groups. The carbapenem-containing combination was better than imipenem for treating mice infected with both carbapenemase producers. In blood, the carbapenem combination significantly decreased the bacterial load of the OXA-23 producers compared with imipenem or meropenem used in monotherapy.Conclusions: These results suggest that dual carbapenem combination could be an option for the treatment of infections due to carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii such as OXA-23 and OXA-58 producers

Efficacy of rifampin, in monotherapy and in combinations, in an experimental murine pneumonia model caused by panresistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains

The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of rifampin, and its combinations with imipenem or sulbactam, in an experimental pneumonia model caused by two panresistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains (HUVR99 and HUVR113). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) (?g/ml) of the strains were rifampin 128/<128 for both strains, imipenem 128/<256 and 256/<256 for HUVR99 and HUVR113, respectively, and sulbactam <256/<256 for both strains. In time-kill studies, at MICs, rifampin was bactericidal for both strains and sulbactam against the HUVR99 strain. Rifampin plus imipenem or sulbactam, at the MIC or mice Cmax, were synergistic. In vivo, against HUVR99 and HUVR113, rifampin (73% and 40%) and its combinations improved the survival with respect to the control group (20% and 0%, p<0.05), respectively. Rifampin (87% and 46%) and its combinations improved the sterilization of blood cultures with respect to the control groups (0%, p<0.05). In regard to the bacterial clearance from lungs, rifampin (2.57±2.47 and 5.35±3.03 log10 cfu/g) and its combinations with imipenem or sulbactam diminished the bacterial lung concentration with respect to the control group (10.89±3.00 and 11.86± 0.49, p<0.05) with both strains. In conclusion, rifampin alone or associated to imipenem or sulbactam were effective for the treatment of murine pneumonia caused by selected panresistant A. baumannii strains. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.This work was supported by research grants from the Consejería de Salud de la Junta de Andalucía (13/02) and the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Instituto de Salud Carlos III—cofinanced by the European Development Regional Fund “A way to achieve Europe” ERDF, Spanish Network for the Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD06/0008/0000).Peer Reviewe

Efficacy of dual carbapenem treatment in a murine sepsis model of infection due to carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii

[Objectives] To evaluate the in vivo efficacy of a dual carbapenem combination containing imipenem plus meropenem against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii producing carbapenemases OXA-23 or OXA-58.[Methods] An experimental model of peritonitis using C57BL/6J female mice was developed and the minimum lethal doses were calculated for infections due to OXA-23 or OXA-58 producers of A. baumannii clinical isolates. The efficacies of the carbapenems in monotherapy and in combination were tested.[Results] Meropenem was better than imipenem in mice infected with either of the carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAb) strains. The combination of meropenem plus imipenem significantly improved the clearance of CRAbs from spleen compared with non-treated groups. The carbapenem-containing combination was better than imipenem for treating mice infected with both carbapenemase producers. In blood, the carbapenem combination significantly decreased the bacterial load of the OXA-23 producers compared with imipenem or meropenem used in monotherapy.[Conclusions] These results suggest that dual carbapenem combination could be an option for the treatment of infections due to carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii such as OXA-23 and OXA-58 producers.This study was carried out as part of our routine work. Authors from the Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Seville, Spain, are supported by Plan Nacional de I + D+i 2013–2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0009)—co-financed by European Development Regional Fund A way to achieve Europe, Operative programme Intelligent Growth 2014–2020. T.C.C. is supported by the V Plan Propio of the University of Seville (USE-19631-N). M.E.P.I. is supported by the programme ‘Nicolás Monardes’ (C1-0038–2019), Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Junta de Andalucía, Spain.Peer reviewe

Pangenome of Acinetobacter baumannii uncovers two groups of genomes, one of them with genes involved in CRISPR/Cas defence systems associated with the absence of plasmids and exclusive genes for biofilm formation

Acinetobacter baumannii is an opportunistic bacterium that causes hospital-acquired infections with a high mortality and morbidity, since there are strains resistant to virtually any kind of antibiotic. The chase to find novel strategies to fight against this microbe can be favoured by knowledge of the complete catalogue of genes of the species, and their relationship with the specific characteristics of different isolates. In this work, we performed a genomics analysis of almost 2500 strains. Two different groups of genomes were found based on the number of shared genes. One of these groups rarely has plasmids, and bears clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) sequences, in addition to CRISPR-associated genes (cas genes) or restriction-modification system genes. This fact strongly supports the lack of plasmids. Furthermore, the scarce plasmids in this group also bear CRISPR sequences, and specifically contain genes involved in prokaryotic toxin–antitoxin systems that could either act as the still little known CRISPR type IV system or be the precursors of other novel CRISPR/Cas systems. In addition, a limited set of strains present a new cas9-like gene, which may complement the other cas genes in inhibiting the entrance of new plasmids into the bacteria. Finally, this group has exclusive genes involved in biofilm formation, which would connect CRISPR systems to the biogenesis of these bacterial resistance structures.The project has been supported by Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013‐2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0009), and co‐ financed by European Development Regional Fund ‘A way to achieve Europe’, Operative program Intelligent Growth 2014‐2020. E.L.M. is supported by ‘Programa de Empleo Joven’ (FEDER/Junta de Andalucía, Fase I, II convocatoria), R.A.-M. by a Juan Rodes grant (JR17/00025), and G.L.-H. by a i-PFIS grant (IFI15/00128) from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spain

In Vitro Activity of Pentamidine Alone and in Combination with Antibiotics against Multidrug-Resistant Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains

© 2020 by the authors.Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a public health problem causing both community and hospital-acquired infections, and thus the development of new therapies for these infections is critical. The objective of this study was to analyze in vitro the activity of pentamidine as adjuvant in combinations to antibiotics against seven clinical P. aeruginosa strains. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) was determined following standard protocols, and the results were interpreted according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints; however, the gentamicin activity was interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations. The bactericidal in vitro activity was studied at 1×MIC concentrations by time–kill curves, and also performed in three selected strains at 1/2×MIC of pentamidine. All studies were performed in triplicate. The pentamidine MIC range was 400–1600 μg/mL. Four of the strains were MDR, and the other three were resistant to two antibiotic families. The combinations of pentamidine at 1×MIC showed synergistic activity against all the tested strains, except for pentamidine plus colistin. Pentamidine plus imipenem and meropenem were the combinations that showed synergistic activity against the most strains. At 1/2×MIC, pentamidine plus antibiotics were synergistic with all three analyzed strains. In summary, pentamidine in combination with antibiotics showed in vitro synergy against multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa clinical strains, which suggests its possible use as adjuvant to antibiotics for the therapy of infections from MDR P. aeruginosa.This study was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Proyectos de Investigación en Salud (PI18-01842), Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0009)—co-financed by European Development Regional Fund A way to achieve Europe, Operative program Intelligent Growth 2014–2020. T.C.-C. is supported by the V Plan Propio of the University of Seville with a postdoctoral contract as research personnel in training. M.E.P.-I. is a researcher belonging to the program “Nicolás Monardes” (C1-0038-2019), Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Junta de Andalucía, Spain. G.L.-H. has a grant from the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, cofinanced by the European Development Regional Fund (A Way to Achieve Europe) and by the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (grant REIPI RD16/0016/0009). R.Á.-M. has a grant Juan Rodes grant from the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, cofinanced by the European Development Regional Fund (A Way to Achieve Europe) and by the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (JR17/00025)