Surgical Treatment of Annuloaortic Ectasia - Replace or Repair?

Background: Patients with annuloaortic ectasia may be surgically treated with modified Bentall or David I valve-sparing procedures. Here, we compared the long-term results of these procedures. Methods: A total of 181 patients with annuloaortic ectasia underwent modified Bentall (102 patients, Group 1) or David I (79 patients, Group 2) procedures from 1994 to 2015. Mean age was 62 ± 11 years in Group? 1? and 64? ± 16 years in Group 2. Group 1 patients were in poorer health, with a lower ejection fraction and higher functional class. Results: Early mortality was 3% in Group 1 and 2.5% in Group 2. Patients undergoing a modified Bentall procedure had a higher incidence of thromboembolism and hemorrhage, whereas those undergoing a David I procedure had a higher incidence of endocarditis. Actuarial survival was 70 ± 6% at 15 years in Group 1 and 84 ± 7% at 10 years in Group 2. Actuarial freedom from reoperation was 97 ± 2% at 15 years in Group 1 and 84 ± 7% at 10 years in Group 2. In Group 2, freedom from procedure-related reoperations was 98 ± 2% at 10 years. At last follow-up, no cases of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation were observed. Conclusions: The modified Bentall and David I procedures showed excellent early and late results. The modified Bentall procedure with a mechanical conduit was associated with thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, whereas the David I procedure was associated with unexplained occurrences of endocarditis. Thus, the David I procedure appears to be safe, reproducible, and capable of achieving stable aortic valve repair and is therefore our currently preferred solution for patients with annuloaortic ectasia. However, the much shorter follow-up for David I patients limits the strength of our comparison between the two techniques

The sorin freedom stentless pericardial valve: clinical and echocardiographic performance at 10 years.

Objective: The Sorin Pericarbon Freedom (SPF) is a stentless valve made of pericardium clinically available in 1990. We report the clinical and hemodynamic performance of the SPF at 10 years. Methods: From April 2000 to December 2005, 85 patients with a mean age of 75 \ub1 6 years (range 57-86), underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with an SPF. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 58 \ub1 10\% (range 29-86\%) and mean peak transvalvular gradient (PG) 86 \ub1 24 mmHg. Clinical evaluation was performed at 3, 6, 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Results: There were 2 operative deaths (2.4\%). Follow-up ranged from 2 to 135 months (mean 78 \ub1 32 months) and was 99\% complete. There were 35 late deaths, 7 of which were valve-related, with an actuarial survival of 45 \ub1 8\% at 10 years. Structural SPF deterioration occurred in 2 patients, with an actuarial freedom of 96 \ub1 3\%. A total of 4 patients were re-operated, 2 because of structural deterioration, 1 because of endocarditis, and 1 because of sinotubular junction dilatation; freedom from reoperation was 93 \ub1 4\% at 10 years. At last clinical control, 41 patients (89\%) were in NYHA class I or II. Mean SPF effective orifice area varied from 1.55 \ub1 0.66 cm2 for size 21 mm to 2.33 \ub1 0.86 cm2 for size 27 mm; PG varied from 19 \ub1 10 mmHg for size 21 mm to 11 \ub1 6 mmHg for size 27 mm. Left ventricular mass index decreased from 213 \ub1 51 gm/m2 to 157 \ub1 436 gm/m2 (p<0.001). Conclusions: The SPF has demonstrated overall good results in terms of valve durability and freedom from valve-related complications up to 10 years, with excellent hemodynamic performance

Trends and safety of bariatric revisional surgery in Italy: multicenter, prospective, observational study

Background: revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) represents a further solution for patients who experience inadequate weight loss (IWL) following primary bariatric surgery (BS) or significant weight regain (WR) following initial satisfactory response. RBS guidelines are lacking; however, an increased trend in further BS offerings has been reported recently. Objective: analyze trend, mortality, complication, readmission, and reoperation rates for any reason at 30 days after RBS in Italy. Setting: ten Italian high-volume BS centers (university hospitals and private centers). Methods: prospective, observational, multicenter study enrolling patients undergoing RBS between October 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022, registering reasons for RBS, technique, mortality, intraoperative and perioperative complications, readmissions, and reinterventions for any reason. Patients undergoing RBS during the same calendar interval in 2016-2020 were considered control patients. Results: a total of 220 patients were enrolled and compared with 560 control-group patients. Mortality was .45% versus .35% (n.s), with an overall mortality of .25%, while open surgery or conversion to open surgery was registered in 1%. No difference was found for mortality, morbidity, complications, readmission (1.3%), and reoperation rates (2.2%). IWL/WR was the most frequent cause, followed by gastroesophageal reflux disease; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was the most used revisional procedure (56%). Sleeve gastrectomy was the most revised procedure in the study group, while gastric banding was the most revised in the control group. RBS represents up to 9% of the total BS in the Italian participating centers. Conclusions: laparoscopy represents the standard approach for RBS, which appears safe. Current Italian trends show a shift toward sleeve gastrectomy being the most revised procedure and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass being the most frequent revisional procedure

Appendectomy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: a multicenter ambispective cohort study by the Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies (the CRAC study)

Major surgical societies advised using non-operative management of appendicitis and suggested against laparoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic. The hypothesis is that a significant reduction in the number of emergent appendectomies was observed during the pandemic, restricted to complex cases. The study aimed to analyse emergent surgical appendectomies during pandemic on a national basis and compare it to the same period of the previous year. This is a multicentre, retrospective, observational study investigating the outcomes of patients undergoing emergent appendectomy in March-April 2019 vs March-April 2020. The primary outcome was the number of appendectomies performed, classified according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) score. Secondary outcomes were the type of surgical technique employed (laparoscopic vs open) and the complication rates. One thousand five hundred forty one patients with acute appendicitis underwent surgery during the two study periods. 1337 (86.8%) patients met the inclusion criteria: 546 (40.8%) patients underwent surgery for acute appendicitis in 2020 and 791 (59.2%) in 2019. According to AAST, patients with complicated appendicitis operated in 2019 were 30.3% vs 39.9% in 2020 (p = 0.001). We observed an increase in the number of post-operative complications in 2020 (15.9%) compared to 2019 (9.6%) (p &lt; 0.001). The following determinants increased the likelihood of complication occurrence: undergoing surgery during 2020 (+ 67%), the increase of a unit in the AAST score (+ 26%), surgery performed &gt; 24 h after admission (+ 58%), open surgery (+ 112%) and conversion to open surgery (+ 166%). In Italian hospitals, in March and April 2020, the number of appendectomies has drastically dropped. During the first pandemic wave, patients undergoing surgery were more frequently affected by more severe appendicitis than the previous year's timeframe and experienced a higher number of complications. Trial registration number and date: Research Registry ID 5789, May 7th, 202

Enlargement of the aortic annulus during aortic valve replacement: a review.

The main goal of aortic valve replacement (AVR) is to obtain relief from the fixed left ventricular (LV) obstruction by replacing the aortic valve with a prosthesis, either mechanical or biological, of adequate size. Most currently available prostheses provide satisfactory hemodynamic performance, but small-sized prostheses may be associated with high transvalvular gradients and suboptimal effective orifice area that result in prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM), and thus are far from ideal for use in young, active patients. The avoidance of PPM is advisable as it has been repeatedly associated with increased mortality, decreased exercise tolerance and an impaired regression of LV hypertrophy after AVR for severe aortic stenosis. Enlargement of the aortic annulus (EAA) has proved to be a valuable method to prevent PPM in the presence of a diminutive aortic root. This review outlines the various techniques described for EAA, presenting technical details, long-term results and major procedure-related complications, and discussing the current role of EAA in patients requiring AVR

Enlargement of the aortic annulus during aortic valve replacement: a review

The main goal of aortic valve replacement (AVR) is to obtain relief from the fixed left ventricular (LV) obstruction by replacing the aortic valve with a prosthesis, either mechanical or biological, of adequate size. Most currently available prostheses provide satisfactory hemodynamic performance, but small-sized prostheses may be associated with high transvalvular gradients and suboptimal effective orifice area that result in prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM), and thus are far from ideal for use in young, active patients. The avoidance of PPM is advisable as it has been repeatedly associated with increased mortality, decreased exercise tolerance and an impaired regression of LV hypertrophy after AVR for severe aortic stenosis. Enlargement of the aortic annulus (EAA) has proved to be a valuable method to prevent PPM in the presence of a diminutive aortic root. This review outlines the various techniques described for EAA, presenting technical details, long-term results and major procedure-related complications, and discussing the current role of EAA in patients requiring AVR

Huge aortic pseudoaneurysm due to detachment of both coronary buttons after the modified Bentall procedure

A 59-year-old female presented with a huge aortic preudoaneurysm (maximum diameter of 9 cm) 12 years following a modified Bentall procedure with a 23mm mechanical conduit (Figures 1,2). At reoperation the pseudoaneurysm was found to be due to complete dehiscence of both coronary ostial anastomoses, compressing the right cardiac sections