257 research outputs found
On computational complexity of Siegel Julia sets
It has been previously shown by two of the authors that some polynomial Julia
sets are algorithmically impossible to draw with arbitrary magnification. On
the other hand, for a large class of examples the problem of drawing a picture
has polynomial complexity. In this paper we demonstrate the existence of
computable quadratic Julia sets whose computational complexity is arbitrarily
high.Comment: Updated version, to appear in Commun. Math. Phy
The Elimination of Low-Molecular-Weight Proteins in Patients with Isolated Acute Renal Failure
Objective: to study the effectiveness of some types of semipermeable dialysis membranes and replacement therapy techniques in patients with isolated acute renal failure (iARF). Subjects and methods: Eighty-nine patients aged 24 to 67 years, who received intensive and replacement/maintenance therapy, were examined. The patients were divided into 3 groups in accordance with their condition rated by the APACHE III scale, from the used dialysis membranes and renal replacement/maintenance therapy options. Results. By varying the permeability of a membrane, its area and the volume of convection, we can control the rate of substance elimination, which is similar to that of test markers having a molecular weight of 100 to 15000 Da. Conclusion. Adequate replacement therapy for iARF is possible only when high-flux, high-permeability dia-lyzers are applied. The indices of hemodialysis/hemodiafiltration adequacy in terms of urea cannot be determinants in patients with iARF. The achievement of elimination of low-molecular-weight proteins β markers of uremic intoxication to 30β35% and/or an increase in effective albumin concentrations as a summary marker of toxicity by 16β20% is of much more importance. Key words: isolated acute renal failure, uremic toxins, hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration
Warming Overcomes Dispersal-Limitation to Promote Non-native Expansion in Lake Baikal
Non-native species and climate change pose serious threats to global biodiversity. However, the roles of climate, dispersal, and competition are difficult to disentangle in heterogeneous landscapes. We combine empirical data and theory to examine how these forces influence the spread of non-native species in Lake Baikal. We analyze the potential for Daphnia longispina to establish in Lake Baikal, potentially threatening an endemic, cryophillic copepod Epischurella baikalensis. We collected field samples to establish current community composition and compared them to model predictions informed by flow rates, present-day temperatures, and temperature projections. Our data and model agree that expansion is currently limited by dispersal. However, projected increases in temperature reverse this effect, allowing D. longispina to establish in Lake Baikalβs main basin. A strong negative impact emerges from the interaction between climate change and dispersal, outweighing their independent effects. Climate, dispersal, and competition have complex, interactive effects on expansion with important implications for global biodiversity
A Few Words about Being-incommon
Received: 20.03.2020. Accepted: 7.09.2020.Π ΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠΈΠ»Π° Π² ΡΠ΅Π΄Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡ: 20.03.2020. ΠΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ° ΠΊ ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ: 7.09.2020.The paper deals with the identifi cation of different aspects of being-incommon (jointness) varying from linguistic one β a traditional linkage between the jointness and a community and identity to a philosophical one β through a reference to the concept βBeing withβ (Heidegger), βmultiplicityβ (Nancy, Virno, Blanchot). Although the refl ection on βmultiplicityβ detects another problem mentioned by Nancy when he argued that meaning as such is impossible where there is no difference. The article considers a status and position of the individual in a community and puts forward a hypothesis according to which a person does not possess an ability to shape his individuality (a system of distinctions) within the framework of a certain plurality that lacks unity. The person constructs his ego and the ego ideal (Z. Freud) using discursive and role-driven blocks presented to him by various groups with relative identity. When exploring the phenomenon of βCompatibilityβ one can reveal one more problem: if a community evolves from a stabilized, slowed-down antagonism that cements, and at the same time, undermines its unity (Loraux), then the question arises why the community does not disintegrate under the impact of a divisive impulse, and what necessary and sufficient conditions for the preservation of jointness are. Inner tension and vulnerability act as such conditions in the article. The principle of instability becomes a basis of jointness and thus distinguishes it from multiplicity. The tradition to identify the functioning of power as a cementing means of the preservation of jointness (Georges Balandier) does not take into account the role of mutual interests, cultural and intentional closeness. βJointnessβ is alive as long as there is dynamics, movement, change (as evidenced by the research on totalitarian regimes by Hannah Arendt). Therefore, the regime of jointness is a well-balanced dynamics and statics that should be in a state of fragile unstable equilibrium. Mata stability described by Gilbert Simondon in his philosophy of individuation can be an ideal model of equilibrium.Π‘ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΡ
Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Β«ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΒ»: ΠΎΡ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ β ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Β«ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΒ» Ρ ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ β ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ»ΠΊΠΈ ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΠΌ Β«ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±ΡΡΠΈΡΒ» (Π₯Π°ΠΉΠ΄Π΅Π³Π³Π΅Ρ), Β«ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΒ» (ΠΠ°Π½ΡΠΈ, ΠΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎ, ΠΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠΎ). ΠΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Β«ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΒ» ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ, Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ» Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΠ°Π½ΡΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΎΠ½ ΡΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΄Π°Π», ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠΌΡΡΠ» ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ ΡΠ°ΠΌ, Π³Π΄Π΅ Π½Π΅Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡ. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π° Π² ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π°, ΠΏΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊ Π½Π΅ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ (ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ) Π² ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°. ΠΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ Π― ΠΈ Π―-ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π°Π» (Π. Π€ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠ΄) ΠΈΠ· Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΡΡ
Π±Π»ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ. ΠΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°: Π΅ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π΅Ρ ΠΈΠ· ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, Π·Π°ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½ΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°, ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ (ΠΠΎΡΠΎ), ΡΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π΅Ρ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡ: ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠ° ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π½Π΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΠ°Π΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ²Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ? Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ Π²ΡΡΡΡΠΏΠ°ΡΡ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½Π΅Π΅ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ·Π²ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ. ΠΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΌΡΠΌ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°Π΅Ρ Π΅Π΅ ΠΎΡ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. Π’ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ (ΠΠΎΡΠΆ ΠΠ°Π»Π°Π½Π΄ΡΠ΅) Π½Π΅ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ ΡΠΎΠ»Ρ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π±Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. Π‘Π»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ²ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ Π² Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ΅ Β«ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΒ» ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°, ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ° Π΅ΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ°, Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ (ΠΎΠ± ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρ
Π₯Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΠΡΠ΅Π½Π΄Ρ). Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠΌ, ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ β ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ±Π°Π»Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Π°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½Ρ Π½Π°Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΡΡ Π² ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΈ Ρ
ΡΡΠΏΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠΈΡ. ΠΠ΄Π΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΡ ΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ, ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΡ ΠΠΈΠ»ΡΠ±Π΅ΡΠΎΠΌ Π‘ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π² ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ
- β¦