Assessing policy transfer from the United States to the British National Health Service

Much has been written about the claim that the British National Health Service (NHS) is becoming more like the US health care system, something a number of commentators view as a form of “Americanization”. Yet, that term is imprecise and unhelpful for rigorous analysis of what has, and has not, happened. This paper uses the lens of policy transfer to explore this issue, which provides a sharper insight into policy development. The paper examines the relevance of the Dolowitz and Marsh framework for the study of policy transfer from the US to the British NHS from 1979 onwards. In terms of the framework’s main research questions, the discussion of the potential US influence on the NHS case stresses the role of policy entrepreneurs in policy transfer. In terms of policy success, however, commentators suggest a mix of uninformed, incomplete, or inappropriate transfer. We conclude that Dolowitz and Marsh do provide a useful framework that asks relevant questions about policy transfer, which provides a more nuanced account of policy transfer from the US to the NHS than the crude term “Americanization”

Handover practices of nurses transferring trauma patients from intensive care units to the ward: A multimethod observational study

Poor-quality patient handover leads to adverse patient outcomes. Consequently, handover has been identified as a national and international priority for preventing patient harm. Risks are exacerbated during transfers of trauma intensive care unit (ICU) patients to a ward because of the complexity of their injuries coupled with a de-escalation in care and monitoring. This study assessed current handover practices for ICU trauma patients, identifying barriers and facilitators to best practice handover. A multimethod design was used, including naturalistic observations of clinical handover of trauma patients transferred to a ward and semistructured interviews with both the ICU and ward nurses caring for the trauma patient. The study was conducted at an Australian metropolitan public adult teaching hospital ICU. Purposive maximal sampling of patient handover opportunities was sought. Recruitment continued until data saturation was reached using thematic analysis. Ten ICU and ward nurses were recruited, with 10 observations of handover and 20 interviews conducted. Observations of the handovers identified multiple issues, including deficits and discrepancies in the information communicated that could impact patient safety, variable handover processes, and poor patient and family involvement. Interviews elicited two major themes around the handover: practices and processes. Nurses identified that interruptions, time, and workload pressures presented barriers to handover, whilst teamwork, using a structured and systematic approach, preparation time for handover, and communication before transfer facilitated effective handover and transfer. Nurses suggested a structured tool to aid handover. This study identified clinically significant deficits and discrepancies in the information communicated to the ward nurses. Nurses identified that interruptions, time, and workload pressures presented barriers to effective handover. Teamwork where preparation and the handover event are prioritised over other activities is needed. A minimum data set for handover in conjunction with patients and family members is recommended. © 2020 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Lt

Reduced expression of the growth hormone and type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptors in human somatotroph tumours and an analysis of possible mutations of the growth hormone receptor

<p>Clinical acromegaly is characterized by elevated GH secretion in the presence of high circulating IGF-I levels. We hypothesized that the physiological IGF-I/GH negative feedback loop may be reset in somatotroph adenomas, specifically in terms of the level of expression of these receptors or mutations of the GH receptor (GH-R) in such tumours.<br> We therefore investigated the full coding sequence of the GH-R in a series of somatotroph and other pituitary adenomas. We also investigated the mRNA expression of these putative feedback receptors in a series of pituitary adenomas and normal pituitary tissue, and their protein expression by immunostaining. Real-time RT-PCR assay was used for the quantification of the type 1 IGF receptor (IGF-R) and GH receptor (GH-R) mRNA, and sequence analysis was performed on the coding region of the GH-R gene.<br> No somatic mutations of the GH-R mRNA were detected in 18 GH-secreting tumours or two nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs). However, the levels of GH-R mRNA were significantly lower in both somatotroph tumours and NFPAs compared to the normal pituitary (P < 0.05 for both). Immunostaining for GH-R also showed significantly less GH-R expression in somatotroph adenomas compared to normal pituitary tissue (P < 0.0001). IGF-R mRNA levels were significantly lower in somatotroph tumours compared to normal pituitary (P = 0.005), and trended lower in corticotroph tumours (P = 0.07), while the other tumour types showed no significant difference from normal pituitary. Immunostaining for IGF-R also showed less IGF-R protein in the somatotroph adenomas compared to the normal pituitary tissue (P < 0.01).<br> Our findings suggest that decreased feedback inhibition of GH because of somatic mutations of the coding region of the GH-R are unlikely to be a common factor in the pathogenesis of these tumours. Nevertheless, decreased expression of the GH-R and of IGF-R in somatotroph tumours (both at the mRNA and protein level) may, at least in part, help explain the continuous secretion of GH from the tumour despite the high circulating levels of IGF-I and GH.</p